Search (133 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI): Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung : Thesenpapier (2021) 0.09
    0.090657674 = product of:
      0.22664419 = sum of:
        0.05249342 = weight(_text_:23 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05249342 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.05249342 = weight(_text_:23 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05249342 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024585744 = score(doc=364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.05249342 = weight(_text_:23 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05249342 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.44800746 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009260627 = score(doc=364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.035317555 = weight(_text_:der in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035317555 = score(doc=364,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4836247 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.4 = coord(6/15)
    
    Abstract
    In der Folge eines Arbeitsauftrags des Standardisierungsausschusses wurde im Herbst 2017 das Expertenteam RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) eingerichtet. Dieses ist der Fachgruppe Erschließung zugeordnet und beschäftigt sich seither mit der Weiterentwicklung der verbalen Inhaltserschließung.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    23. 9.2021 19:15:14
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  2. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.08
    0.082142755 = product of:
      0.15401766 = sum of:
        0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023199033 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023199033 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.026614847 = weight(_text_:und in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026614847 = score(doc=374,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023199033 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.024215251 = weight(_text_:zur in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024215251 = score(doc=374,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.24055663 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.008185315 = weight(_text_:in in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008185315 = score(doc=374,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.018022915 = weight(_text_:der in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018022915 = score(doc=374,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.00738224 = product of:
          0.02214672 = sum of:
            0.02214672 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02214672 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
    
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  3. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.07
    0.074170835 = product of:
      0.1589375 = sum of:
        0.018559227 = weight(_text_:23 in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018559227 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.018559227 = weight(_text_:23 in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018559227 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.036878616 = weight(_text_:und in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036878616 = score(doc=753,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.018559227 = weight(_text_:23 in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018559227 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.15839456 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027396431 = score(doc=753,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009260627 = score(doc=753,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.02972415 = weight(_text_:der in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02972415 = score(doc=753,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.40703082 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    
    Abstract
    Der 70. Band der BIPRA-Reihe beschäftigt sich mit der Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung im Kontext etablierter Verfahren und technologischer Innovationen. Treffen heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Methoden und Systeme aufeinander, müssen minimale Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung festgelegt werden. Die Qualitätsfrage wird zurzeit in verschiedenen Zusammenhängen intensiv diskutiert und im vorliegenden Band aufgegriffen. In diesem Themenfeld aktive Autor:innen beschreiben aus ihrem jeweiligen Blickwinkel unterschiedliche Aspekte zu Metadaten, Normdaten, Formaten, Erschließungsverfahren und Erschließungspolitik. Der Band versteht sich als Handreichung und Anregung für die Diskussion um die Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung.
    Content
    Inhalt: Editorial - Michael Franke-Maier, Anna Kasprzik, Andreas Ledl und Hans Schürmann Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung - Ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) - Andreas Ledl Fit for Purpose - Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten - Joachim Laczny Neue Wege und Qualitäten - Die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek - Ulrike Junger und Frank Scholze Wissensbasen für die automatische Erschließung und ihre Qualität am Beispiel von Wikidata - Lydia Pintscher, Peter Bourgonje, Julián Moreno Schneider, Malte Ostendorff und Georg Rehm Qualitätssicherung in der GND - Esther Scheven Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung - Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) Coli-conc - Eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen - Uma Balakrishnan, Stefan Peters und Jakob Voß Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten - Clemens Neudecker, Karolina Zaczynska, Konstantin Baierer, Georg Rehm, Mike Gerber und Julián Moreno Schneider Datenqualität als Grundlage qualitativer Inhaltserschließung - Jakob Voß Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen - Rudolf Ungváry und Péter Király Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND - Das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten - Sina Menzel, Hannes Schnaitter, Josefine Zinck, Vivien Petras, Clemens Neudecker, Kai Labusch, Elena Leitner und Georg Rehm Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) - Fabian Steeg und Adrian Pohl Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen - Überlegungen zur Qualität - Heidrun Wiesenmüller Inhaltserschließung für Discovery-Systeme gestalten - Jan Frederik Maas Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals - Christian Wartena und Koraljka Golub Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED - Cyrus Beck Quantität als Qualität - Was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können - Rita Albrecht, Barbara Block, Mathias Kratzer und Peter Thiessen Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung - Harald Sack
    Date
    23. 9.2021 16:09:53
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110691597/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691597. Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 73(2022) H.2-3, S.131-132 (B. Lorenz u. V. Steyer). Weitere Rezension in: o-bib 9(20229 Nr.3. (Martin Völkl) [https://www.o-bib.de/bib/article/view/5843/8714].
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
  4. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.05
    0.052077796 = product of:
      0.15623339 = sum of:
        0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045931738 = score(doc=7238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045931738 = score(doc=7238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.045931738 = weight(_text_:23 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045931738 = score(doc=7238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008103048 = score(doc=7238,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
        0.010335136 = product of:
          0.031005409 = sum of:
            0.031005409 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031005409 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in library OPACs might be improved for some users by taking advantage of all of the hierarchical relationships which are indicated on existing LCSH entries. Recommends that cross references pointing to broader terms be displayed, in addition to those for narrower and related terms to which users have traditionally benn directed. Traces the old practice back to Charles Cutter, reports on deliberations of the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee nearly 120 years later. Discusses practical concerns related to implementing the change, including the accuracy of hierarchical relationships in the LCSH system and possible techniques for using the MARC format to generate the cross references
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.2, S.5-16
  5. Dikovich, W.; Labner, J.; Schmidt, A.: Schlagwortketten-Recherche für den BIBOS-OPAC (1993) 0.05
    0.05030948 = product of:
      0.18866053 = sum of:
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
        0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05567768 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
        0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627497 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekare. 46(1993) H.2, S.23-32
  6. Davies, R.: Thesaurus-aided searching in search and retrieval protocols (1996) 0.04
    0.044936858 = product of:
      0.13481057 = sum of:
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
        0.014194585 = weight(_text_:und in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014194585 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
        0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009260627 = score(doc=5169,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Open system protocols for search and retrieval have not provided explicit ways in which to implement thesaurus-aided searching. A number of different approaches within the existing protocols, as well as a proposed service, are evaluated. A general approach to implementing thesaurus-aided searching, particularly during consultation of a thesaurus, requires an entirely new service, whose main features are described
    Date
    23. 7.1996 19:14:52
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Hildreth, C.R.: Intelligent interfaces and retrieval methods for subject searching in bibliographic retrieval systems (1989) 0.04
    0.04020533 = product of:
      0.15076998 = sum of:
        0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046398066 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
        0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046398066 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
        0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046398066 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
        0.0115757845 = weight(_text_:in in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115757845 = score(doc=2306,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 20:46:32
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship (1990) S.44 (R.J. Dorn); Bibliothek; Forschung u. Praxis 14(1990) S.90-91 (W. Umstätter)
    Series
    Advances in library information technology; 2
  8. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.03
    0.0325463 = product of:
      0.12204862 = sum of:
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
        0.01069325 = weight(_text_:in in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01069325 = score(doc=3606,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
    Date
    20. 6.2010 14:23:18
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die deutsche Übersetzung in: ZfBB (1994) H.3, S.294-297
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  9. Studwell, W.E.: ¬The three camps : the present and possible future status of subject access in online catalogues (1996) 0.03
    0.031120533 = product of:
      0.11670199 = sum of:
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
        0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037118454 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
        0.005346625 = weight(_text_:in in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005346625 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Date
    23. 2.1997 19:32:40
  10. Bisig, U.: OPAC und verbale Sacherschließung : ein Beitrag zur RSWK-Diskussion (1994) 0.03
    0.029496253 = product of:
      0.11061094 = sum of:
        0.03174006 = weight(_text_:und in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03174006 = score(doc=4322,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
        0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027396431 = score(doc=4322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
        0.01069325 = weight(_text_:in in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01069325 = score(doc=4322,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
        0.0407812 = weight(_text_:der in 4322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0407812 = score(doc=4322,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 4322, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4322)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    In der vorliegenden Form können die RSWK nicht befriedigen. Die geforderte hochdifferenzierte Erschließung ist in einem OPAC wegen der vielfältigen Abfragemöglichkeiten gar nicht nötig, ja eine einheitliche Indexierung und effiziente Suche is aufgrund der komplexen Regeln sogar erschwert. Aufgaben und Probleme der verbalen Sacherschließung in OPACs werden in dieser Arbeit aufgezeigt und Ansätze zu einer Alternative diskutiert. Der traditionelle Indexkatalog hat als Ergänzung des modernen Information Retrieval nur eine Zukunft, wenn die Möglichkeiten der EDV und der Faktor Mensch bei der Regelwerkentwicklung besser berücksichtigt werden
  11. Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996) 0.03
    0.02847801 = product of:
      0.10679253 = sum of:
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009356594 = score(doc=6941,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.1, S.73-98
  12. Lopes, M.I.: Principles underlying subject heading languages : an international approach (1996) 0.03
    0.02847801 = product of:
      0.10679253 = sum of:
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=5608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
        0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 5608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009356594 = score(doc=5608,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5608, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5608)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the problems in establishing commonly accepted principles for subject retrieval between different bibliographic systems. The Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages was established to devise general principles for any subject retrieval system and to review existing real systems in the light of such principles and compare them in order to evaluate the extent of their coverage and their application in current practices. Provides a background and history of the Working Group. Discusses the principles underlying subject headings and their purposes and the state of the work and major findings
    Date
    10. 2.2001 10:52:23
  13. Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001) 0.03
    0.028143732 = product of:
      0.10553899 = sum of:
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
        0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008103048 = score(doc=6113,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Date
    23. 6.2002 12:56:57
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
  14. Voorbij, H.: ¬Een goede titel behoeft geen trefwoord, of toch wel? : een vergelijkend oderzoek titelwoorden - trefwoorden (1997) 0.03
    0.027747214 = product of:
      0.104052044 = sum of:
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=1446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
        0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 1446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066161114 = score(doc=1446,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1446, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1446)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    A recent survey at the Royal Library in the Netherlands showed that subject headings are more efficient than title keywords for retrieval purposes. 475 Dutch publications were selected at random and assigned subject headings. The study showed that subject headings provided additional useful information in 56% of titles. Subsequent searching of the library's online catalogue showed that 88% of titles were retrieved via subject headings against 57% through title keywords. Further precision may be achieved with the help of indexing staff, but at considerable cost
    Source
    Informatie professional. 1(1997) no.11, S.23-27
  15. Allen, B.: Improved browsable displays : an experimental test (1993) 0.03
    0.027230462 = product of:
      0.10211423 = sum of:
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=2775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2775)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=2775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2775)
        0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032478645 = score(doc=2775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2775)
        0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 2775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004678297 = score(doc=2775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2775)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Browse searching of online catalogs and electronic indexes is a popular means of retrieving information, but some subject heading lists are so extensive that browsing them can be difficult and time-consuming. This resaerch tested one way of presenting a browse interface to reduce the amount of scanning of subject headings required. It found that a hierarchical presentation of headings reduced the amount of scanning required by more than 50% without any reduction in the effectiveness of the search. Better browsable displays of this sort can improve the efficiency of searching but appear not to alter effectivenenss
    Date
    23. 1.1999 20:39:57
  16. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Recherche von nach RSWK gebildeten Daten in der CD-ROM-Ausgabe der Deutschen Bibliographie (1990) 0.03
    0.025140828 = product of:
      0.0942781 = sum of:
        0.02509272 = weight(_text_:und in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02509272 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.03424554 = weight(_text_:zur in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03424554 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34019846 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.009451588 = weight(_text_:in in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009451588 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
        0.02548825 = weight(_text_:der in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02548825 = score(doc=168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Source
    Die Schlagwortnormdatei. Entwicklungsstand und Nutzungsmöglichkeiten, Vorträge eines Kolloquiums zur Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) in Frankfurt a. M. am 5. u. 6.10.1989. Zusammengestellt u. hrsg. von Werner Stephan
  17. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.03
    0.025083682 = product of:
      0.07525104 = sum of:
        0.026347356 = weight(_text_:und in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026347356 = score(doc=4360,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.36362273 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.011985939 = weight(_text_:zur in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011985939 = score(doc=4360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.119069465 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.0077580786 = weight(_text_:in in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0077580786 = score(doc=4360,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17445749 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.021851625 = weight(_text_:der in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021851625 = score(doc=4360,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.0073080454 = product of:
          0.021924136 = sum of:
            0.021924136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021924136 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032692216 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    
    Abstract
    Es werden die Grundprobleme der Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen dargestellt. Ein anschließendes Kapitel behandelt das Verhältnis von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Erschließung. Ein wichtiger Teil der Aussagen betrifft das Gebiet der verbalen Sacherschließung und damit das nationale Regelwerk: Es werden Vorschläge für eine Reform der RSWK im Hinblick auf die Erfordernisse der OPAC unterbreitet. Regelwerk und Normdatei (SWD) bilden dabei eine Einheit und werden zusammen betrachtet. Im vergangenen Jahr wurden die Ergebnisse der Expertengruppe mit dem Schwerpunkt Formalerschließung vorgelegt, nun folgen die Aussagen zur Sacherschließung, welche die Expertengruppe - in veränderter personeller Zusammensetzung unter Leitung von Dr. Friedrich Geißelmann, Regensburg - erarbeitet hat. Die bibliothekarische Öffentlichkeit ist aufgefordert, sich dazu bis zum Jahresende zu äußern. Beide Berichte beziehen sich aufeinander und versuchen, den Zusammenhang zwischen Formal- und Sacherschließung herzustellen. Vom gegenwärtigen Stand der Sacherschließung in deutschen Bibliotheken ausgehend - wozu auch durch die Gruppe im Frühjahr 1993 eine Umfrage in wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken gemacht worden ist, werden die Grundprobleme der Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen dargestellt. Ein anschließendes Kapitel behandelt das Verhältnis von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Erschließung. Ein wichtiger Teil der Aussagen betrifft das Gebiet der verbalen Sacherschließung und damit das nationale Regelwerk: Es werden Vorschläge für ein Reform der RSWK im Hinblick auf die Erfordernisse des OPAC unterbreitet. Regelwerk und Normdatei (SWD) bilden dabei eine Einheit und werden zusammen betrachtet. Es geht um Kettenbildung und Permutationsregeln, Kompositumbildung oder Zerlegung von Begriffen, Pleonasmus, Funktion der SWD, Ansetzung von Schlagwörtern, die Einführung eines Zeit-Codes, Erschließung literarischer Formen und Gattungen, den verwendeten Zeichensatz, den Umgang mit Verweisungen
    Classification
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Editor
    Kommission des DBI für Erschließung und Katalogmanagement / Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
    RVK
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
  18. Wilkens, K.: Drei Sätze zur Idee einer integrierten Formal-und Sacherschließung in Datenbanken (1995) 0.02
    0.023868212 = product of:
      0.08950579 = sum of:
        0.020074176 = weight(_text_:und in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020074176 = score(doc=1031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
        0.04745201 = weight(_text_:zur in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04745201 = score(doc=1031,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.4713928 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
        0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756127 = score(doc=1031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
        0.014418332 = weight(_text_:der in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014418332 = score(doc=1031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Vorsatz zum Sinn von Normdateien: "Die sachgerechte Nutzung von Normdateien erfordert eine ausgeklügelte Datenbankstruktur, über die sich Bibliothekare und Informatiker offensichtlich erst noch verständigen müssen"; Hauptsatz zur Redundanz von P,T,G,C,K,Z,F - verbale Sacherschließung als Funktion: "Außer den Sachschlagwörtern können alle anderen Schlagwortkategorien der RSWK/SWD 'eingespart', auf die Einrichtung eigener Schlagwortkettenfelder in den Titelaufnahmen kann verzichtet werden: Nachsatz zur 'Kombinatorik': "An die Stelle von Schlagwortketten würden Chiffren für Verknüpfungskombinationen ('Kombinationsmuster') treten, die auch im Sinne von Steuerungsinstrumenten zu nutzen wären"
  19. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.02
    0.021049803 = product of:
      0.078936756 = sum of:
        0.021291878 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021291878 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
        0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020547325 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
        0.010609381 = weight(_text_:in in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010609381 = score(doc=1643,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
        0.026488166 = weight(_text_:der in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026488166 = score(doc=1643,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
  20. Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.; Tzali, A.: Visualizing OPAC subject headings (2008) 0.02
    0.020102665 = product of:
      0.07538499 = sum of:
        0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023199033 = score(doc=2549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
        0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023199033 = score(doc=2549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
        0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023199033 = score(doc=2549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
        0.0057878923 = weight(_text_:in in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057878923 = score(doc=2549,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032692216 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims at providing a robust, user-friendly and efficient navigation procedure in an online library catalog that is based on semantic information encapsulated within subject headings. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes an interactive navigation procedure inside an online library catalog based on semantic information. The proposed approach is presented through a web-based, prototype application following the most recent trends of the semantic web such as AJAX technology and the web ontology language - OWL for encoding semantics. Findings - According to the proposed method, a GUI interface exposes the hierarchy of the subject headings employed within an OPAC, as well as all stated relations between such headings, as links that the user can follow, effectively traversing the ontology and formulating at the same time the actual query to the underlying OPAC. This act of interactive navigation through the library's assets aids searchers in accurately formulating their queries, by offering broader or narrower concepts for selection or indicating alternative or related concepts they might be initially unaware of. The augmented exposition of inter-relations between concepts provides multiple paths for information retrieval and enables searchers to fulfill their information needs in a faster, more efficient and intuitive manner. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for the development of modern, semantic web applications focused on the library domain. The novel approach of visualizing subject headings could be further extended to visualize a number of other conceptualizations of the library domain. Originality/value - This paper fulfils an identified need to take advantage of the "hidden knowledge" existing within the library domain but, for a number of reasons, is never exposed to the library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 26(2008) no.1, S.19-23

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 103
  • d 25
  • nl 2
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 108
  • m 12
  • el 10
  • s 7
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…