-
Freitext in Informationssystemen (1985)
0.07
0.07400621 = product of:
0.22201861 = sum of:
0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05567768 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05567768 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.05567768 = weight(_text_:23 in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05567768 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04109465 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.01389094 = weight(_text_:in in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01389094 = score(doc=2036,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Footnote
- Deutsche Fassung von 'Free text in information systems' in: International classification 12(1985) H.2, S.95-98. Wegen einiger Ungereimtheiten sollte die englische Fassung benutzt werden
- Series
- Empfehlungen zur Klassifikation; EK-03
- Source
- International classification. 12(1985) no.1, S.23-26
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.07
0.070482306 = product of:
0.17620575 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.045477543 = weight(_text_:software in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045477543 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.35064998 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00756127 = score(doc=7701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Basch, R.: ¬Die sieben Todsünden der Volltextrecherche (1990)
0.06
0.060913432 = product of:
0.15228358 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.021512525 = weight(_text_:und in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021512525 = score(doc=2034,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=2034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.008103048 = weight(_text_:in in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008103048 = score(doc=2034,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 2034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02523208 = score(doc=2034,freq=8.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 2034, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2034)
0.4 = coord(6/15)
- Abstract
- Dieser Artikel diskutiert die "sieben Todsünden" der Volltextrecherche und macht sowohl praktische als auch utopische Vorschläge zu ihrer Überwindung. Zunächst wird versucht, die persönlichen "sieben Sünden" auf einer Standardliste zu verzeichnen. Je nachdem, welches Standardwerk man zu Rate zieht, kommen hierbei einige interessante Abweichungen vor. Selbst der Thesaurus von WordPerfect zeigt auf die Frage nach "Sünde" hilfsbereit alle sieben! Ein Beispiel für "Stolz" ist das Online-System, für das in ganzseitigen Anzeigen in großen nationalen Publikationen erklärt wird: 'Unser Angebot ist eine Welt von Informationen auf Knopfdruck'. "Gier" ist das Downloading von Volltexten, "Trägheit" die langsame Verarbeitungszeit: "Geiz" hat etwas mit der Preisgestaltung zu tun, und alles liegt irgendwo zwischen "Lust" und "Ärger"; c'est la vie, n'est-ce pas?
- Footnote
- dt. Übers. - Original in: Database Nr.8(1989) S.15-23
-
Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996)
0.06
0.05701249 = product of:
0.17103747 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.06892324 = weight(_text_:software in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06892324 = score(doc=6757,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.53142565 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004678297 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 19:00:23
- Object
- Personal Library Software
- Theme
- Bibliographische Software
-
Paijmans, H.: Gravity wells of meaning : detecting information rich passages in scientific texts (1997)
0.03
0.032164264 = product of:
0.12061599 = sum of:
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
0.037118454 = weight(_text_:23 in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037118454 = score(doc=7444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009260627 = score(doc=7444,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Presents research in which 4 term weigthing schemes were used to detect information rich passages in texts and the results compared. Demonstrates that word categories and frequency derived weights have a close correlation but that weighting according to the first mention theory or the cue method shows no correlation with frequency based weights
- Date
- 2.12.2005 11:51:23
-
Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005)
0.03
0.032118417 = product of:
0.096355245 = sum of:
0.022738772 = weight(_text_:software in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022738772 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.025589654 = weight(_text_:und in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025589654 = score(doc=548,freq=26.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3531656 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.023726005 = weight(_text_:zur in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023726005 = score(doc=548,freq=6.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2356964 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.0026733126 = weight(_text_:in in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026733126 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.060115322 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627497 = score(doc=548,freq=18.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
- Abstract
- Die Möglichkeiten, die der heutigen Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft für die Beschaffung und den Austausch von Information zur Verfügung stehen, haben kurioserweise gleichzeitig ein immer akuter werdendes, neues Problem geschaffen: Es wird für jeden Einzelnen immer schwieriger, aus der gewaltigen Fülle der angebotenen Informationen die tatsächlich relevanten zu selektieren. Diese Arbeit untersucht die Möglichkeit, mit Hilfe von natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstellen den Zugang des Informationssuchenden zu Volltextdatenbanken zu verbessern. Dabei werden zunächst die wissenschaftlichen Fragestellungen ausführlich behandelt. Anschließend beschreibt der Autor verschiedene Lösungsansätze und stellt anhand einer natürlichsprachlichen Schnittstelle für den Brockhaus Multimedial 2004 deren erfolgreiche Implementierung vor
- Content
- Enthält die Kapitel: 2: Wissensrepräsentation 2.1 Deklarative Wissensrepräsentation 2.2 Klassifikationen des BMM 2.3 Thesauri und Ontologien: existierende kommerzielle Software 2.4 Erstellung eines Thesaurus im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 3: Analysekomponenten 3.1 Sprachliche Phänomene in der maschinellen Textanalyse 3.2 Analysekomponenten: Lösungen und Forschungsansätze 3.3 Die Analysekomponenten im LeWi-Projekt 4: Information Retrieval 4.1 Grundlagen des Information Retrieval 4.2 Automatische Indexierungsmethoden und -verfahren 4.3 Automatische Indexierung des BMM im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 4.4 Suchstrategien und Suchablauf im LeWi-Kontext
5: Interaktion 5.1 Frage-Antwort- bzw. Dialogsysteme: Forschungen und Projekte 5.2 Darstellung und Visualisierung von Wissen 5.3 Das Dialogsystem im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 5.4 Ergebnisdarstellung und Antwortpräsentation im LeWi-Kontext 6: Testumgebungen und -ergebnisse 7: Ergebnisse und Ausblick 7.1 Ausgangssituation 7.2 Schlussfolgerungen 7.3 Ausblick Anhang A Auszüge aus der Grob- bzw. Feinklassifikation des BMM Anhang B MPRO - Formale Beschreibung der wichtigsten Merkmale ... Anhang C Fragentypologie mit Beispielsätzen (Auszug) Anhang D Semantische Merkmale im morphologischen Lexikon (Auszug) Anhang E Regelbeispiele für die Fragentypzuweisung Anhang F Aufstellung der möglichen Suchen im LeWi-Dialogmodul (Auszug) Anhang G Vollständiger Dialogbaum zu Beginn des Projektes Anhang H Statuszustände zur Ermittlung der Folgefragen (Auszug)
- Series
- Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Sprach- und Translationswissenschaft; Bd.8
-
Blair, D.C.; Maron, M.E.: ¬An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.02783884 = product of:
0.13919419 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch : Salton, G.: Another look ... Comm. ACM 29(1986) S.S.648-656; Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23: Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: Full-text information retrieval ... Inf. proc. man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986)
0.03
0.02783884 = product of:
0.13919419 = sum of:
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.046398066 = weight(_text_:23 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046398066 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3959864 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
-
Preston, L.A.; Ebbs, C.M.; Luther, J.: 'Full text' access evaluation : are we getting the real thing? (1998)
0.03
0.027747214 = product of:
0.104052044 = sum of:
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.032478645 = weight(_text_:23 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032478645 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.0066161114 = weight(_text_:in in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066161114 = score(doc=2695,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Examines the comparative value of full text access and journal subscription through a sampling of journal issues available online from the Information Access Corporation and in print at James Madison University in Virginia. Presents a model for assessing the value of full text online subscriptions which can be used to evaluate journal subscription, back file retention, document delivery options, index selection, and online access
- Date
- 6. 2.1997 18:23:32
-
Palos, S.: Indexierung, Volltextrecherche und digital Text-Dossiers (1999)
0.03
0.02675324 = product of:
0.100324646 = sum of:
0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024585744 = score(doc=4069,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.027396431 = weight(_text_:zur in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027396431 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.27215877 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00756127 = score(doc=4069,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.0407812 = weight(_text_:der in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0407812 = score(doc=4069,freq=16.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.5584417 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Der Artikel stellt Ergebnisse einer Studie zur vergleichenden Bewertung von Verfahren der nachfrageorientierten Inhaltserschließung im Volltextarchiv der Stuttgarter Zeitung vor. Im ersten Teil der Arbeit wird empirisch untersucht, ob in der digitalen Pressedokumentation auf eine intellektuelle Indexierung von Artikeln verzichtet werden kann, wenn ausschließlich im Volltext recherchiert wird. Im zweiten Teil der Arbeit werden Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer innovativen Inhaltserschließung von Volltexten in der Textdokumentation der Stuttgarter Zeitung mittels Digitaler Textdossiers diskutiert
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.7, S.413-419
-
Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001)
0.03
0.026186615 = product of:
0.0981998 = sum of:
0.044887222 = weight(_text_:und in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044887222 = score(doc=5937,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.6194934 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.009260627 = weight(_text_:in in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009260627 = score(doc=5937,freq=6.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.03224037 = weight(_text_:der in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03224037 = score(doc=5937,freq=10.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- OSIRIS und ELIB sind von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und dem Niedersächsischen Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (MWK) geförderte Projekte an der Universität Osnabrück. Sie beschäftigen sich mit intuitiv-natürlichsprachlichen Retrievalsystemen und mit Fragen der Indexierung großer Volltexdatenbanken in dieser Technik. Die Entwicklungen haben dazu geführt, daß an sich aufwendige und komplexe Verfahren der syntaktisch-semantischen Analyse und Bewertung von textuellen Phrasen in relationale Datenbanken für Massendaten eingebettet werden konnten und nun im Produktionsbetrieb eingesetzt werden können
- Date
- 14. 6.2001 12:22:31
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 54(2001) H.1, S.55-62
-
Stegentritt, E.: EMIR: Multilinguales Freitextretrieval Projekt (1992)
0.02
0.024542393 = product of:
0.09203397 = sum of:
0.021291878 = weight(_text_:und in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021291878 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
0.04109465 = weight(_text_:zur in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04109465 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.40823817 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008019937 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
0.021627497 = weight(_text_:der in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021627497 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Series
- Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.7
- Source
- Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
-
Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval : Evaluation and implications (1986)
0.02
0.023783326 = product of:
0.089187466 = sum of:
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.02783884 = weight(_text_:23 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02783884 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.005670953 = weight(_text_:in in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005670953 = score(doc=2047,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Recently, a detailed evaluation of a large, operational full-text document retrieval system was reported in the literature. Values of precision and recall were estimated usind traditional statistical sampling methods and blind evaluation procedures. The results of this evaluation demonstrated that the system tested was retrieving less then 20% of the relevant documents when the searchers believed it was retrieving over 75% of the relevant documents. This evaluation is described including some data not reported in the original article. Also discussed are the implications which this study has for how the subjects of documents should be represented, as well as the importance of rigorous retrieval evaluations for the furtherhance of information retrieval research
- Source
- International classification. 13(1986), S.18-23
-
Kugler, A.: Automatisierte Volltexterschließung von Retrodigitalisaten am Beispiel historischer Zeitungen (2018)
0.02
0.021540858 = product of:
0.08077821 = sum of:
0.018439308 = weight(_text_:und in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018439308 = score(doc=4595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
0.035589006 = weight(_text_:zur in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035589006 = score(doc=4595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3535446 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008019937 = score(doc=4595,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
0.018729964 = weight(_text_:der in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018729964 = score(doc=4595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Seit ein paar Jahren postuliert die DFG in ihren Praxisregeln "Digitalisierung", dass eine ausschließliche Bilddigitalisierung nicht mehr den wissenschaftlichen Ansprüchen Genüge leiste, sondern der digitale Volltext notwendig sei, da dieser die Basis für eine wissenschaftliche Nachnutzung darstellt. Um ein besseres Verständnis davon zu erlangen, was sich hinter dem Begriff "Volltext" verbirgt, wird im Folgenden ein kleiner Einblick in die technischen Verfahren zur automatisierten Volltexterschließung von Retrodigitalisaten geboten. Fortschritte und auch Grenzen der aktuellen Methoden werden vorgestellt und wie Qualität in diesem Zusammenhang überhaupt bemessen werden kann. Die automatisierten Verfahren zur Volltexterschließung werden am Beispiel historischer Zeitungen erläutert, da deren Zugänglichmachung gerade in den Geisteswissenschaften ein großes Desiderat ist und diese Quellengattung zugleich aufgrund der Spaltenstruktur besondere technische Herausforderungen mit sich bringt. 2016 wurde das DFG-Projekt zur Erstellung eines "Masterplan Zeitungsdigitalisierung" fertiggestellt, dessen Ergebnisse hier einfließen.
-
Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006)
0.02
0.021103816 = product of:
0.07913931 = sum of:
0.021947164 = weight(_text_:und in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021947164 = score(doc=5142,freq=34.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3028952 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.022972606 = weight(_text_:zur in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022972606 = score(doc=5142,freq=10.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.22821206 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.0066497815 = weight(_text_:in in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066497815 = score(doc=5142,freq=22.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.14953499 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.02756976 = weight(_text_:der in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02756976 = score(doc=5142,freq=52.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3775294 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
52.0 = termFreq=52.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Content
- "Mit Google Print bzw. mittlerweile Google Book Search und dem Projekt zur Übernahme eines brancheneigenen Portals zur Pflege und Bereitstellung digitaler Daten aus Büchern namens "Volltextsuche online" initiiert durch den Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels tritt ein Thema auf den Plan, das im deutschen Sprachraum lange vernachlässigt wurde: allgemein gesprochen, die Notwendigkeit der Texterschließung durch Indexierung - sei sie gedruckt in Form von Registern im Anhang von Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern oder ungedruckt in Form sog. Volltextabfragen per Suchmaske am Computer. Angesichts der exponentiell wachsenden Menge an Wissen ist es gut, wenn hierzu Überlegungen angestellt werden und damit die Chance besteht, neben der wirtschaftlichen auch über die wissenstheoretische Dimension dieser Dienste nachzudenken. Zweifellos wird die Bedeutung der Indexierung von Fließtext aus wissenstheoretischer Sicht in Zukunft noch weiter wachsen und bedeutet im Falle einer Online-Plattform (wenn sie denn in naher Zukunft eine hinreichend große Menge an Büchern in ihrem Datenbestand aufweisen wird) die Erfüllung eines Traumes für die wissenschaftliche Arbeit: Es ist fantastisch, in Millisekunden das Vorhandensein von Personen, Termen, Phrasen und Wortkomposita zu ermitteln, um die Ein- bzw. Nichteinschlägigkeit eines Buches und - mehr noch -vieler Bücher für die eigene Arbeit eindeutig beantworten zu können. Es ist fantastisch, im Trefferfall die gesuchte Information sogleich auf dem Monitor exzerpieren zu können oder sich auch bei ausbleibenden Treffern das Durcharbeiten eines ganzen Buches, vielleicht sogar einer halben Bibliothek ersparen zu können. Dabei ist das letztere Resultat mindestens eine genauso wichtige Information wie die erste, denn auch sie wird- man darf fast sagen, so gut wie immer - zu einer unglaublichen Ersparnis an Zeit verhelfen; hier bedeutet allein schon die Verringerung der Datenmenge einen Zuwachs an Wissen unter minimalem Zeitaufwand. Angesichts dieser Diagnose ist die These zu wagen, die digitale Revolution beginnt erst wirklich bei der Nutzung der Volltexte selbst als Datenquelle zur Wissensabfrage.
. . . Ich plädiere hier aus den oben genannten wissenstheoretischen Gründen nicht nur für die Aufrechterhaltung eines Mindestmaßes an Registern und Indexen im Anhang von physischen Büchern, sondern sogar für deren Ausbau, deren standardmäßige Zugabe bei Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern gerade angesichts der Volltextnutzung durch Online-Abfragen. Warum? Hierzu sechs Argumente: 1. Wie oben bereits angerissen, lehrt die Erfahrung bei CD-ROM-Zugaben zu opulenten Werken, dass Parallelmedien mit Parallelinhalten von den Nutzern nicht wirklich angenommen werden; es ist umständlich, zur Auffindung bestimmter Textstellen den Computer befragen zu müssen und die Fundstellen dann zwischen zwei Buchdeckeln nachzuschlagen. 2. Über frei wählbare Suchbegriffe seitens des Nutzers ist noch keine Qualität der Suchergebnisse garantiert. Erst das Einrechnen entsprechender Verweisungsbegriffe und Synonyme in die Suchabfrage führt zu Qualität des Ergebnisses. Die scheinbar eingesparten Kosten einer einmaligen bzw. abonnementartigen Investition in eine Online-Verfügbarkeit der Buchinhalte vonseiten der Verlage werden dann über die Hintertür doch wieder fällig, wenn sich nämlich herausstellt, dass Nutzer bei der von ihnen gesuchten Information nicht fündig werden, weil sie unter dem "falschen", d.h. entweder ihnen nicht bekannten oder einem ihnen gerade nicht präsenten Schlagwort gesucht haben. Die Online-Suchabfrage, die auf den ersten Blick höchst nutzerfreundlich erscheint, da eine ungeheure Menge an Titeln die Abfrage umfasst, erweist sich womöglich als wenig brauchbar, wenn sich die Trefferqualität aus den genannten Gründen als beschränkt herausstellt. 3. Nur bei entsprechenden Restriktionen des Zugangs bzw. der präsentierten Textausschnitte werden die Verlage es gewährleistet sehen, dass die Nutzerin, der Nutzer nicht vom Kauf des physischen Buches Abstand nehmen. Nur wenn die Nutzer wissen, dass ihnen gerade jene Informationen am Bildschirm vorenthalten werden, die sie im zu erwerbenden Buch mit Gewissheit finden werden, werden sie das Buch noch erwerben wollen. Wer auf die Schnelle nur ein Kochrezept aus einem teuer bebilderten Kochbuch der Oberklasse abrufen kann, wird das teure Kochbuch eben nicht mehr kaufen. Analog stellt sich die Frage, ob nicht aus diesem Grunde auch Bibliotheken erwägen werden, angesichts der elektronischen Präsenz teuerer physischer Bücher auf den Erwerb der Letzteren zu verzichten, wohl wissend, dass den Wissenschaftlern im Zweifel einige Mausklicks genügen, um die gewünschte Begriffsrecherche erschöpfend beantwortet zu finden.
4. Vermutlich wird sich aufgrund der genannten Gründe der Buchservice Volltextsuche als heterogen darstellen: Einige Verlage werden gar nicht mitspielen, andere werden ein Buch im Vollzugriff, ein anderes nur zum Teil, ein drittes nur als Metainformation usw. indizieren lassen. Dies wird letztlich ebenfalls die Trefferqualität schmälern, da der Nutzer dann wiederum wissen muss, genau welche Informationen und Texte ihm bei seiner Suche vorenthalten werden. Das gedruckte Sachbuch wird gegen seinen eigenen digitalen Klon ein Alleinstellungsmerkmal brauchen, um weiterhin attraktiv zu sein. 5. Ein solches Alleinstellungsmerkmal würde m.E. maßgeblich durch die Erstellung von gedruckten Registern bereits in der Druckausgabe erreicht werden. Damit würde die Druckausgabe tatsächlich an Wert gewinnen und der Buchkäufer erhielte einen echten Mehrwert. Zum einen spiegelt sich bereits in der Erstellung konventioneller gedruckter Register die zweite digitale Revolution wider: Moderne Registererstellung basiert heutzutage ebenfalls auf der digitalen Verwertung des Volltextes. Zum anderen erfordert das "Registermachen" zugleich die Erbringung jener o.g. sachdienlichen Mehrinformationen wie Verweisungsbegriffe, vernünftige Klassifizierungen, nicht-redundante Begriffsauswahl etc., die nur begrenzt automatisierbar sind und Fachwissen erfordern. Erst diese beiden Komponenten lassen die Indexierung schlussendlich zu einer hochwertigen Aufbereitung sequentieller Information werden. 6. Genau diese Mehr- und Metainformationen, die die vorausgegangene Erstellung eines Print-Vollregisters geliefert hat, lassen sich dann in den Suchalgorithmus der Online-Suche zur Qualitätssteigerung der Treffer einrechnen."
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.4, S.217-218
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018)
0.02
0.019819437 = product of:
0.07432289 = sum of:
0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023199033 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023199033 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.023199033 = weight(_text_:23 in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023199033 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.117170855 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.004725794 = weight(_text_:in in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004725794 = score(doc=4300,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.23-32
-
Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000)
0.02
0.018381836 = product of:
0.06893188 = sum of:
0.024585744 = weight(_text_:und in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024585744 = score(doc=4919,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.00756127 = weight(_text_:in in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00756127 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.024973284 = weight(_text_:der in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024973284 = score(doc=4919,freq=6.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.011811584 = product of:
0.035434753 = sum of:
0.035434753 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035434753 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114482574 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 17:48:06
- Source
- Dokumente und Datenbanken in elektronischen Netzen: Tagungsberichte vom 6. und 7. Österreichischen Online-Informationstreffen bzw. vom 7. und 8. Österreichischen Dokumentartag, Schloß Seggau, Seggauberg bei Leibnitz, 26.-29. September 1995, Congresszentrum Igls bei Innsbruck, 21.-24. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: E. Pipp
-
Kuhlen, R.; Hess, M.S.: Passagen-Retrieval : auch eine Möglichkeit der automatischen Verknüpfung in Hypertexten (1993)
0.02
0.01690493 = product of:
0.06339348 = sum of:
0.010645939 = weight(_text_:und in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010645939 = score(doc=1947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.020547325 = weight(_text_:zur in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020547325 = score(doc=1947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.100663416 = queryWeight, product of:
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.20411909 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.079125 = idf(docFreq=5528, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.008019937 = weight(_text_:in in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008019937 = score(doc=1947,freq=8.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.024180276 = weight(_text_:der in 1947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024180276 = score(doc=1947,freq=10.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 1947, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1947)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Das Passagen-Retrieval erlaubt explorierendes Navigieren in Volltextdatenbanken, aber auch in textorientierten Hypertextbasen. Es wird experimentell an fünf, im Information Retrieval geläufigen Assoziationskoeffizienten überprüft, inwieweit mit ihnen Textpassagen, gewonnen aus der Konversion von Absätzen aus einer Buchvorlage (Hypertextbuch von R. Kuhlen, 1991b), automatisch verknüpft werden können. Voraussetzung für die Anwendung der Maße ist eine Volltextinvertierung mit linguistisch abgesicherter Stammformenreduktion. Die Ergebnisse, gewonnen aus der Bewertung der Verknüpfungsangebote entsprechend den Berechnungen nach den fünf Koeffizienten und aus dem Vergleich mit einer intellektuellen Verknüpfungsvorgabe, zeigen eine deutliche Präferenz zugunsten des Asymmetrie-Maßes, das vielleicht noch durch eine Kombination mit dem Cosinus-Maß verbessert werden könnte. Die automatisch erstellten Verknüpfungsangebote sind sowohl im Autoren-Modus zur Unterstützung des Aufbaus von Hypertextbasen sinnvoll als auch im Lese-Modus als Möglichkeit des assoziativen Navigierens in großen Hypertextbasen verwendbar.
-
Huschens, C.: Freitextindexierung in der Parlamentsdokumentation (1986)
0.01
0.0118858395 = product of:
0.0594292 = sum of:
0.024840524 = weight(_text_:und in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024840524 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07245795 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
0.009356594 = weight(_text_:in in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009356594 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
0.02523208 = weight(_text_:der in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02523208 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
0.073026784 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
0.2 = coord(3/15)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1986, Freiburg, 8.-10.10.1986: Bedarfsorientierte Fachinformation: Methoden und Techniken am Arbeitsplatz. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Hane, P.J.: AOL acquires Personal Library Software (1998)
0.01
0.0112352 = product of:
0.084263995 = sum of:
0.0795857 = weight(_text_:software in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0795857 = score(doc=1813,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12969498 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.61363745 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.004678297 = weight(_text_:in in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004678297 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.044469737 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.032692216 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- In Jan 1997 AOL annouced its acquisition of Personal Library Software, a leading developer of information indexing and search technologies, which are at the core of online a CD-ROM products from major providers such as Dow Jones and Knight Ridder. AOL is the world's leading Internet online service. Quotes the company heads concerning the advantages of the deal for searchers but reports that no specific details of its terms have been released. Outlines the history of the companies focusing on the role of Matthew Koll founder of Personal Library Software and now joining AOL and the reactions of information professionals
- Object
- Personal Library Software
