-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.01
0.012488919 = product of:
0.074933514 = sum of:
0.06330704 = weight(_text_:software in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06330704 = score(doc=7247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12766245 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.49589399 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.011626477 = product of:
0.03487943 = sum of:
0.03487943 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03487943 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Abstract
- Describes an experiment comparing the performance of automatic full-text indexing software for personal computers with the human intellectual assignment of indexing terms in each document in a collection. Considers the times required to index the document, to retrieve documents satisfying 5 typical foreseen information needs, and the recall and precision ratios of searching. The software used is QuickFinder facility in WordPerfect 6.1 for Windows
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.01
0.007816568 = product of:
0.046899408 = sum of:
0.0395669 = weight(_text_:software in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0395669 = score(doc=4152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12766245 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.007332509 = product of:
0.021997526 = sum of:
0.021997526 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021997526 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Abstract
- A software system has been developed which orders citations retrieved from an online database in terms of relevancy. The system resulted from an effort generated by NASA's Technology Utilization Program to create new advanced software tools to largely automate the process of determining relevancy of database citations retrieved to support large technology transfer studies. The ranking is based on the generation of an enriched vocabulary using lexical association methods, a user assessment of the vocabulary and a combination of the user assessment and the lexical metric. One of the key elements in relevancy ranking is the enriched vocabulary -the terms mst be both unique and descriptive. This paper examines term uniqueness. Six lexical association methods were employed to generate characteristic word indices. A limited subset of the terms - the highest 20,40,60 and 7,5% of the uniquess words - we compared and uniquess factors developed. Computational times were also measured. It was found that methods based on occurrences and signal produced virtually the same terms. The limited subset of terms producedby the exact and centroid discrimination value were also nearly identical. Unique terms sets were produced by teh occurrence, variance and discrimination value (centroid), An end-user evaluation showed that the generated terms were largely distinct and had values of word precision which were consistent with values of the search precision.
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46
-
Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996)
0.01
0.0073421216 = product of:
0.044052728 = sum of:
0.033573627 = weight(_text_:software in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033573627 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12766245 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.0104791 = weight(_text_:und in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0104791 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Abstract
- This article introduces a new concept and technique for information retrieval called 'colinked descriptors'. Borrowed from an analogous idea in bibliometrics - cocited references - colinked descriptors provide a theory and method for identifying search terms that, by hypothesis, will be superior to those entered initially by a searcher. The theory suggests a means of moving automatically from 2 or more initial search terms, to other terms that should be superior in retrieval performance to the 2 original terms. A research project designed to test this colinked descriptor hypothesis is reported. The results suggest that the approach is effective, although methodological problems in testing the idea are reported. Algorithms to generate colinked descriptors can be incorporated easily into system interfaces, front-end or pre-search systems, or help software, in any database that employs a thesaurus. The potential use of colinked descriptors is a strong argument for building richer and more complex thesauri that reflect as many legitimate links among descriptors as possible
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.01
0.0071624424 = product of:
0.042974655 = sum of:
0.03124264 = weight(_text_:und in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03124264 = score(doc=2526,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.011732014 = product of:
0.03519604 = sum of:
0.03519604 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03519604 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Abstract
- Für eine fiktive Dokumentmenge wird eine Dokument-Wort-Matrix erstellt und mittels zweier Suchanfragen, ebenfalls als Matrix dargestellt, die Retrievalergebnisse ermittelt. Den Wörtern der Dokumentmenge werden in einem zweiten Schritt Aspekte zugeordnet und die Untersuchung erneut durchgeführt. Ein Vergleich bestätigt die schon früher gefundenen Vorteile des aspektischen Indexierung gegenüber anderen Methoden der Retrievalverbesserung, wie Trunkierung und Controlled Terms
- Date
- 4. 1.1999 19:31:29
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.8, S.459-462
-
Gil-Leiva, I.; Alonso-Arroyo, A.: Keywords given by authors of scientific articles in database descriptors (2007)
0.00
0.0038569113 = product of:
0.046282936 = sum of:
0.046282936 = weight(_text_:informatik in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046282936 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16419695 = queryWeight, product of:
5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.2818745 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.1024737 = idf(docFreq=730, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Field
- Informatik
-
Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991)
0.00
0.0022781093 = product of:
0.02733731 = sum of:
0.02733731 = weight(_text_:und in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02733731 = score(doc=5104,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Abstract
- Auf der Grundlage von vier Originaldokumenten, d.h. dokumentarischen Bezugseinheiten (DBEs), wird die Indexierung in vier biomedizinischen Online-Datenbanken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS PREVIEWS, SCISEARCH) analysiert. Anhand von Beispielen werden inahltliche Erschließung, Indexierungstiefe, Indexierungsbreite, Indexierungskonsistenz, Präzision (durch syntaktisches Indexieren, Gewichtung, Proximity Operatoren) und Wiederauffindbarkeit (Recall) der in den Datenbanken gespeicherten Dokumentationseinheien (DBEs) untersucht. Die zeitaufwendigere intellektuelle Indexierung bei MEDLINE und EMBASE erweist sich als wesentlich präziser als die schneller verfügbare maschinelle Zuteilung von Deskriptoren in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH. In Teil 1 der Untersuchung werden die Indexierungen in MEDLINE und EMBASE, in Teil 2 die Deskriptorenzuteilungen in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH verglichen
-
Tinker, F.F.: Imprecision in meaning measured by inconsistency of indexing (1966-68)
0.00
0.0014554306 = product of:
0.017465167 = sum of:
0.017465167 = weight(_text_:und in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017465167 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Content
- Ergebnisse: (1) Wenn SW frei gewählt, Recherche um so schwieriger, je mehr SW; (2) 'ältere' SW häufiger und weniger genau verwendet als 'jüngere'; (3) viele Wörter mit ungenauer Bedeutung
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.00
0.0014533097 = product of:
0.017439716 = sum of:
0.017439716 = product of:
0.052319143 = sum of:
0.052319143 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052319143 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989)
0.00
0.0011643445 = product of:
0.013972133 = sum of:
0.013972133 = weight(_text_:und in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013972133 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Content
- Die Studie enthält Konsistenzzahlen bezogen auf die LCSH. Diese Zahlen sind kategorienbezogen und können teilweise auf die RSWK übertragen werden
-
Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002)
0.00
9.7327045E-4 = product of:
0.011679245 = sum of:
0.011679245 = product of:
0.017518867 = sum of:
0.00879901 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00879901 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.008719858 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008719858 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
- Footnote
- Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
-
Bellamy, L.M.; Bickham, L.: Thesaurus development for subject cataloging (1989)
0.00
8.7325834E-4 = product of:
0.0104791 = sum of:
0.0104791 = weight(_text_:und in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0104791 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003)
0.00
8.7325834E-4 = product of:
0.0104791 = sum of:
0.0104791 = weight(_text_:und in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0104791 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07132241 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.00
8.4776396E-4 = product of:
0.010173167 = sum of:
0.010173167 = product of:
0.0305195 = sum of:
0.0305195 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0305195 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
8.4776396E-4 = product of:
0.010173167 = sum of:
0.010173167 = product of:
0.0305195 = sum of:
0.0305195 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0305195 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998)
0.00
7.332509E-4 = product of:
0.008799011 = sum of:
0.008799011 = product of:
0.02639703 = sum of:
0.02639703 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02639703 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 24. 2.1999 21:29:51
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.00
7.332509E-4 = product of:
0.008799011 = sum of:
0.008799011 = product of:
0.02639703 = sum of:
0.02639703 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02639703 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 16:17:19
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
7.2665483E-4 = product of:
0.008719858 = sum of:
0.008719858 = product of:
0.026159571 = sum of:
0.026159571 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026159571 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
7.2665483E-4 = product of:
0.008719858 = sum of:
0.008719858 = product of:
0.026159571 = sum of:
0.026159571 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026159571 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11268844 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005)
0.00
6.1104243E-4 = product of:
0.007332509 = sum of:
0.007332509 = product of:
0.021997526 = sum of:
0.021997526 = weight(_text_:29 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021997526 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 3.12.2005 19:38:29
-
Lee, D.H.; Schleyer, T.: Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing : a comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers (2012)
0.00
6.1104243E-4 = product of:
0.007332509 = sum of:
0.007332509 = product of:
0.021997526 = sum of:
0.021997526 = weight(_text_:29 in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021997526 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113198735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.032179873 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 14:29:37
