Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Information retrieval"
  1. Booth, P.F.; South, M.L.: Information filing and finding (1982) 0.05
    0.050876193 = product of:
      0.101752385 = sum of:
        0.101752385 = product of:
          0.20350477 = sum of:
            0.20350477 = weight(_text_:300 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20350477 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3045538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.047913 = idf(docFreq=283, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050356843 = queryNorm
                0.6682063 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.047913 = idf(docFreq=283, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    XVIII, 300 S
  2. Lankes, R.D.: New concepts in digital reference (2009) 0.02
    0.020350477 = product of:
      0.040700953 = sum of:
        0.040700953 = product of:
          0.08140191 = sum of:
            0.08140191 = weight(_text_:300 in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08140191 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3045538 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.047913 = idf(docFreq=283, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050356843 = queryNorm
                0.26728252 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.047913 = idf(docFreq=283, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Let us start with a simple scenario: a man asks a woman "how high is Mount Everest?" The woman replies "29,029 feet." Nothing could be simpler. Now let us suppose that rather than standing in a room, or sitting on a bus, the man is at his desk and the woman is 300 miles away with the conversation taking place using e-mail. Still simple? Certainly--it happens every day. So why all the bother about digital (virtual, electronic, chat, etc.) reference? If the man is a pilot flying over Mount Everest, the answer matters. If you are a lawyer going to court, the identity of the woman is very important. Also, if you ever want to find the answer again, how that transaction took place matters a lot. Digital reference is a deceptively simple concept on its face: "the incorporation of human expertise into the information system." This lecture seeks to explore the question of how human expertise is incorporated into a variety of information systems, from libraries, to digital libraries, to information retrieval engines, to knowledge bases. What we learn through this endeavor, begun primarily in the library context, is that the models, methods, standards, and experiments in digital reference have wide applicability. We also catch a glimpse of an unfolding future in which ubiquitous computing makes the identification, interaction, and capture of expertise increasingly important. It is a future that is much more complex than we had anticipated. It is a future in which documents and artifacts are less important than the contexts of their creation and use.
  3. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.013645315 = product of:
      0.02729063 = sum of:
        0.02729063 = product of:
          0.05458126 = sum of:
            0.05458126 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05458126 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17634109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050356843 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  4. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986) 0.01
    0.013645315 = product of:
      0.02729063 = sum of:
        0.02729063 = product of:
          0.05458126 = sum of:
            0.05458126 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05458126 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17634109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050356843 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2007 10:07:51
  5. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.01
    0.010233985 = product of:
      0.02046797 = sum of:
        0.02046797 = product of:
          0.04093594 = sum of:
            0.04093594 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04093594 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17634109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050356843 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
  6. Anderson, J.D.; Perez-Carballo, J.: Information retrieval design : principles and options for information description, organization, display, and access in information retrieval databases, digital libraries, catalogs, and indexes (2005) 0.00
    0.004264161 = product of:
      0.008528322 = sum of:
        0.008528322 = product of:
          0.017056644 = sum of:
            0.017056644 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017056644 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17634109 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050356843 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapters 2 to 5: Scopes, Domains, and Display Media (pp. 47-102) Chapters 6 to 8: Documents, Analysis, and Indexing (pp. 103-176) Chapters 9 to 10: Exhaustivity and Specificity (pp. 177-196) Chapters 11 to 13: Displayed/Nondisplayed Indexes, Syntax, and Vocabulary Management (pp. 197-364) Chapters 14 to 16: Surrogation, Locators, and Surrogate Displays (pp. 365-390) Chapters 17 and 18: Arrangement and Size of Displayed Indexes (pp. 391-446) Chapters 19 to 21: Search Interface, Record Format, and Full-Text Display (pp. 447-536) Chapter 22: Implementation and Evaluation (pp. 537-541)