Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0077067777 = product of:
  0.07706778 = sum of:
    0.07706778 = weight(_text_:300 in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07706778 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1922255 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.047913 = idf(docFreq=283, maxDocs=44218)
          0.031783774 = queryNorm
        0.4009238 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.047913 = idf(docFreq=283, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.

0.0012918789 = product of:
  0.012918788 = sum of:
    0.012918788 = product of:
      0.025837576 = sum of:
        0.025837576 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025837576 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11130136 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031783774 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Date

17. 2.2018 18:22:25

8.949998E-4 = product of:
  0.008949998 = sum of:
    0.008949998 = product of:
      0.026849993 = sum of:
        0.026849993 = weight(_text_:k in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026849993 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11346102 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031783774 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

Ontology, in its philosophical meaning, is the discipline investigating the structure of reality. Its findings can be relevant to knowledge organization, and models of knowledge can, in turn, offer relevant ontological suggestions. Several philosophers in time have pointed out that reality is structured into a series of integrative levels, like the physical, the biological, the mental, and the cultural, and that each level plays as a base for the emergence of more complex levels. More detailed theories of levels have been developed by Nicolai Hartmann and James K. Feibleman, and these have been considered as a source for structuring principles in bibliographic classification by both the Classification Research Group (CRG) and Ingetraut Dahlberg. CRG's analysis of levels and of their possible application to a new general classification scheme based an phenomena instead of disciplines, as it was formulated by Derek Austin in 1969, is examined in detail. Both benefits and open problems in applying integrative levels to bibliographic classification are pointed out.

7.458331E-4 = product of:
  0.007458331 = sum of:
    0.007458331 = product of:
      0.022374993 = sum of:
        0.022374993 = weight(_text_:k in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022374993 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11346102 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031783774 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Source

Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch