Search (118 results, page 2 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.01 
    0.013336368 = product of:
  0.026672736 = sum of:
    0.026672736 = product of:
      0.05334547 = sum of:
        0.05334547 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05334547 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
  2. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01 
    0.013336368 = product of:
  0.026672736 = sum of:
    0.026672736 = product of:
      0.05334547 = sum of:
        0.05334547 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05334547 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  3. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01 
    0.013336368 = product of:
  0.026672736 = sum of:
    0.026672736 = product of:
      0.05334547 = sum of:
        0.05334547 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05334547 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
  4. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01 
    0.011787795 = product of:
  0.02357559 = sum of:
    0.02357559 = product of:
      0.04715118 = sum of:
        0.04715118 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04715118 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  5. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.01 
    0.011787795 = product of:
  0.02357559 = sum of:
    0.02357559 = product of:
      0.04715118 = sum of:
        0.04715118 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04715118 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  6. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.01 
    0.011787795 = product of:
  0.02357559 = sum of:
    0.02357559 = product of:
      0.04715118 = sum of:
        0.04715118 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04715118 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  7. Yan, E.: Finding knowledge paths among scientific disciplines (2014) 0.01 
    0.011787795 = product of:
  0.02357559 = sum of:
    0.02357559 = product of:
      0.04715118 = sum of:
        0.04715118 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04715118 = score(doc=1534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.10.2014 20:22:22
  8. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.01 
    0.011787795 = product of:
  0.02357559 = sum of:
    0.02357559 = product of:
      0.04715118 = sum of:
        0.04715118 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04715118 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  9. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  10. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  11. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
  12. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46
  13. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  15. Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:02:21
  16. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  17. Vieira, E.S.; Cabral, J.A.S.; Gomes, J.A.N.F.: Definition of a model based on bibliometric indicators for assessing applicants to academic positions (2014) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=1221,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 18:22:21
  18. Manley, S.: Letters to the editor and the race for publication metrics (2022) 0.01 
    0.011669322 = product of:
  0.023338644 = sum of:
    0.023338644 = product of:
      0.046677288 = sum of:
        0.046677288 = weight(_text_:22 in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046677288 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2022 19:22:26
  19. Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996) 0.01 
    0.010002276 = product of:
  0.020004552 = sum of:
    0.020004552 = product of:
      0.040009104 = sum of:
        0.040009104 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040009104 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
  20. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01 
    0.010002276 = product of:
  0.020004552 = sum of:
    0.020004552 = product of:
      0.040009104 = sum of:
        0.040009104 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040009104 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17234851 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049216706 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 109
  • d 8
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 116
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications