Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Reichmann, G."
  • × author_ss:"Schlögl, C."
  1. Reichmann, G.; Schlögl, C.: Möglichkeiten zur Steuerung der Ergebnisse einer Forschungsevaluation (2021) 0.02
    0.020208826 = product of:
      0.080835305 = sum of:
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
        0.021359377 = weight(_text_:der in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021359377 = score(doc=5660,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5660)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Ein Leistungsvergleich zwischen den (ehemaligen) Instituten für Informationswissenschaft der Universitäten Düsseldorf und Graz auf Basis der Forschungsleistung für einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren zeigt, wie sehr die Ergebnisse einer Forschungsevaluation gesteuert werden können. Durch die Wahl "geeigneter" Indikatoren gelingt es - je nach Wunsch - entweder das eine oder das andere Institut an die erste Stelle zu bringen. Hält man sich dagegen an das wissenschaftliche Gebot der Unparteilichkeit, führt dies im hier gezeigten Anwendungsbeispiel zu gemischten Ergebnissen.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.4, S.212-220