Rahmstorf, G.: Sprachlicher Ausdruck für spezifische Begriffe (1979)
0.06
0.059485834 = product of:
0.1982861 = sum of:
0.024340155 = weight(_text_:und in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024340155 = score(doc=80,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024215192 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.024340155 = weight(_text_:und in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024340155 = score(doc=80,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024215192 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.024723826 = weight(_text_:der in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024723826 = score(doc=80,freq=14.0), product of:
0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.024215192 = queryNorm
0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.024340155 = weight(_text_:und in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024340155 = score(doc=80,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024215192 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.07620166 = weight(_text_:erkenntnis in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07620166 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15446307 = queryWeight, product of:
6.378767 = idf(docFreq=203, maxDocs=44218)
0.024215192 = queryNorm
0.4933326 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.378767 = idf(docFreq=203, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.024340155 = weight(_text_:und in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024340155 = score(doc=80,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024215192 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Es wird immer häufiger gefordert, in Informationssystemen nicht nur bibliographische Daten und Referate bzw. Abstracts zu speichern, sondern diese Informationen im vollständigen Text anzubieten. Die Volltextspeicherung eignet sich besonders für sehr spezifische Forschungsberichte und handbuchartige, in sich geschlossene Artikel über Detailprobleme der wissenschaftlichen Diskussion. Es wird der Vorschlag gemacht, spezifische Textinhalte durch mehrgliedrige Ausdrücke der natürlichen Sprache zu kennzeichnen. Um diese Methode für Textbeschreibung und für Information Retrieval in Informationssystemen anzuwenden, müssen Syntax und Semantik mehrgliedriger nominaler Ausdrücke analysiert werden
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
