Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × theme_ss:"Ausbildung"
  1. Tappenbeck, I.; Michel, A.; Wittich, A.; Werr, N.; Gäde, M.; Spree, U.; Gläser, C.; Griesbaum, J.; Mandl, T.; Keller-Loibl, K.; Stang, R.: Framework Informationskompetenz : Ein gemeinsamer Standard für die Qualifikation in den bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Studiengängen in Deutschland (2022) 0.01
    0.005222989 = product of:
      0.053535637 = sum of:
        0.015234124 = weight(_text_:und in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015234124 = score(doc=540,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
        0.015234124 = weight(_text_:und in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015234124 = score(doc=540,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
        0.007833267 = product of:
          0.015666533 = sum of:
            0.015666533 = weight(_text_:29 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015666533 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057585433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015234124 = weight(_text_:und in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015234124 = score(doc=540,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
      0.09756097 = coord(4/41)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag stellt Ergebnisse der Fachgruppe Informationskompetenz der KIBA vor, in der alle Lehrenden im Bereich der Vermittlung von Medien- und Informationskompetenz an bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Studiengängen in Deutschland zusammenarbeiten. Ausgangspunkt ist das "Framework Informationskompetenz", ein Anforderungsrahmen, der gemeinsame Standards in der Qualifikation von Studierenden der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft für das Aufgabenfeld der Förderung von Informationskompetenz sichern soll. Es wird aufgezeigt, wie die in diesem Rahmenmodell formulierten Qualifikationsstandards in den verschiedenen Studiengängen umgesetzt werden und wo es bedarfsbezogene Ausprägung und Gewichtung in den Qualifikationszielen gibt.
    Date
    2. 4.2022 13:42:29
  2. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.01
    0.005216114 = product of:
      0.053465173 = sum of:
        0.015234124 = weight(_text_:und in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015234124 = score(doc=252,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
        0.015234124 = weight(_text_:und in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015234124 = score(doc=252,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
        0.015234124 = weight(_text_:und in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015234124 = score(doc=252,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
        0.007762802 = product of:
          0.015525604 = sum of:
            0.015525604 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015525604 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05732584 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.09756097 = coord(4/41)
    
    Abstract
    Das EconBiz Academic Career Kit ist ein interaktives Online-Tutorial für den wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. In drei Modulen geht es um die Themen: erste Veröffentlichung, Open Access, Predatory Journals und Urheberrecht - Wissenschaftskommunikation, kollaboratives Arbeiten, Networking und Metriken - Forschungsdatenmanagement. Angebote der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz sind in diesen Feldern und für diese Zielgruppe in Deutschland noch nicht flächendeckend verbreitet. Darum - und weil Forschende sich zu diesen Fragen meist im Netz informieren - ist das Academic Career Kit als OER unter der Lizenz CC-BY veröffentlicht und damit zur Bearbeitung und Weiterverwendung durch Dritte freigegeben.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  3. Haring, M.; Rudaev, A.; Lewandowski, D.: Google & Co. : wie die "Search Studies" an der HAW Hamburg unserem Nutzungsverhalten auf den Zahn fühlen: Blickpunkt angewandte Forschung (2022) 0.00
    0.0038154193 = product of:
      0.03910805 = sum of:
        0.0100519145 = weight(_text_:und in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100519145 = score(doc=630,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
        0.0100519145 = weight(_text_:und in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100519145 = score(doc=630,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
        0.008952306 = product of:
          0.017904611 = sum of:
            0.017904611 = weight(_text_:29 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017904611 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057585433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0100519145 = weight(_text_:und in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100519145 = score(doc=630,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
      0.09756097 = coord(4/41)
    
    Abstract
    Die Forschungsgruppe Search Studies forscht an der HAW Hamburg zur Nutzung kommerzieller Suchmaschinen, zur Suchmaschinenoptimierung und zum Relevance Assessment von Suchmaschinen. Der Leiter der Forschungsgruppe, Prof. Dr. Dirk Lewandowski, stand für ein Interview zu seiner Tätigkeit und der seines Teams, sowie seiner Lehre an der HAW Hamburg zur Verfügung. Sollten wir Informationen aus dem Internet vertrauen oder ist Vorsicht angebracht?
    Date
    28. 1.2022 11:05:29
  4. Bertram, J.: ¬Ein Online-Lehrkonzept für die Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.00
    0.0027304261 = product of:
      0.037315827 = sum of:
        0.012438609 = weight(_text_:und in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012438609 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.012438609 = weight(_text_:und in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012438609 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
        0.012438609 = weight(_text_:und in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012438609 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.03628249 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.016370254 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.07317073 = coord(3/41)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.2/3, S.119-127
  5. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.00
    0.0011412158 = product of:
      0.023394924 = sum of:
        0.017850066 = sum of:
          0.006659684 = weight(_text_:4 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.006659684 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.04442393 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.016370254 = queryNorm
              0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.011190382 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011190382 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057585433 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.016370254 = queryNorm
              0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.0055448585 = product of:
          0.011089717 = sum of:
            0.011089717 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011089717 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05732584 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.048780486 = coord(2/41)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  6. Hudon, M.: ¬The status of knowledge organization in library and information science master's programs (2021) 0.00
    1.9105528E-4 = product of:
      0.007833267 = sum of:
        0.007833267 = product of:
          0.015666533 = sum of:
            0.015666533 = weight(_text_:29 in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015666533 = score(doc=697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057585433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.024390243 = coord(1/41)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2022 18:46:29
  7. Zhang, Y.; Wu, D.; Hagen, L.; Song, I.-Y.; Mostafa, J.; Oh, S.; Anderson, T.; Shah, C.; Bishop, B.W.; Hopfgartner, F.; Eckert, K.; Federer, L.; Saltz, J.S.: Data science curriculum in the iField (2023) 0.00
    1.3646806E-4 = product of:
      0.005595191 = sum of:
        0.005595191 = product of:
          0.011190382 = sum of:
            0.011190382 = weight(_text_:29 in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011190382 = score(doc=964,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057585433 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.024390243 = coord(1/41)
    
    Date
    12. 5.2023 14:29:42
  8. Ekstrand, M.D.; Wright, K.L.; Pera, M.S.: Enhancing classroom instruction with online news (2020) 0.00
    1.3524045E-4 = product of:
      0.0055448585 = sum of:
        0.0055448585 = product of:
          0.011089717 = sum of:
            0.011089717 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011089717 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05732584 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.024390243 = coord(1/41)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Das, S.; Bagchi, M.; Hussey, P.: How to teach domain ontology-based knowledge graph construction? : an Irish experiment (2023) 0.00
    1.3524045E-4 = product of:
      0.0055448585 = sum of:
        0.0055448585 = product of:
          0.011089717 = sum of:
            0.011089717 = weight(_text_:22 in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011089717 = score(doc=1126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05732584 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.024390243 = coord(1/41)
    
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:19:22
  10. Wu, D.; Xu, H.; Sun, Y.; Lv, S.: What should we teach? : A human-centered data science graduate curriculum model design for iField schools (2023) 0.00
    8.121565E-5 = product of:
      0.003329842 = sum of:
        0.003329842 = product of:
          0.006659684 = sum of:
            0.006659684 = weight(_text_:4 in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006659684 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04442393 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.024390243 = coord(1/41)
    
    Abstract
    The information schools, also referred to as iField schools, are leaders in data science education. This study aims to develop a data science graduate curriculum model from an information science perspective to support iField schools in developing data science graduate education. In June 2020, information about 96 data science graduate programs from iField schools worldwide was collected and analyzed using a mixed research method based on inductive content analysis. A wide range of data science competencies and skills development and 12 knowledge topics covered by the curriculum were obtained. The humanistic model is further taken as the theoretical and methodological basis for course model construction, and 12 course knowledge topics are reconstructed into 4 course modules, including (a) data-driven methods and techniques; (b) domain knowledge; (c) legal, moral, and ethical aspects of data; and (d) shaping and developing personal traits, and human-centered data science graduate curriculum model is formed. At the end of the study, the wide application prospect of this model is discussed.
  11. Hjoerland, B.: Education in knowledge organization (KO) (2023) 0.00
    8.121565E-5 = product of:
      0.003329842 = sum of:
        0.003329842 = product of:
          0.006659684 = sum of:
            0.006659684 = weight(_text_:4 in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006659684 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04442393 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016370254 = queryNorm
                0.14991207 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.024390243 = coord(1/41)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides analyses, describes dilemmas, and suggests way forwards in the teaching of knowl­edge organization (KO). The general assumption of the article is that theoretical problems in KO must be the point of departure for teaching KO. Section 2 addresses the teaching of practical, applied and professional KO, focusing on learning about specific knowl­edge organization systems (KOS), specific standards, and specific methods for organizing knowl­edge, but provides arguments for not isolating these aspects from theoretical issues. Section 3 is about teaching theoretical and academic KO, in which the focus is on examining the bases on which KOSs and knowl­edge organization processes such as classifying and indexing are founded. This basically concerns concepts and conceptual relations and should not be based on prejudices about the superiority of either humans or computers for KO. Section 4 is about the study of education in KO, which is considered important because it is about how the field is monitoring itself and about how it should be shaping its own future. Section 5 is about the role of the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowl­edge Organization in education of KO, emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary source that may help improve the conceptual clarity in the field. The conclusion suggests some specific recommendations for curricula in KO based on the author's view of KO.