Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : focusing on the idea of equivalence (1996) 0.00
    0.0020723052 = product of:
      0.0393738 = sum of:
        0.03333941 = sum of:
          0.01523625 = weight(_text_:4 in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01523625 = score(doc=491,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.016551789 = queryNorm
              0.3392123 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
          0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018103162 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.016551789 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
        0.0060343873 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05263158 = coord(2/38)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the conceptual structure of bibliographic relationships between a work and its related bibliographic entities in terms of the idea of equivalence as a mathematical concept. Bibliographic entities, such as the work, the text, the edition, and the printing, are also considered as functional foci resulting from data elements contributed by authors, translators, editors and publishers. Examines 4 types of dominant bibliographic relationships focusing on common structural patterns revealed within each entity
    Date
    29. 8.1997 18:58:16
    Source
    TP & D forum series. 1996, no.5, S.4-14
  2. Sugano, I.: ¬The study of criteria for evaluating OPACs as information retrieval systems (1996) 0.00
    0.001837432 = product of:
      0.034911208 = sum of:
        0.028876819 = sum of:
          0.010773656 = weight(_text_:4 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010773656 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.016551789 = queryNorm
              0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018103162 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.016551789 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
        0.0060343873 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=1626,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05263158 = coord(2/38)
    
    Abstract
    Most of the criteria proposed to date for the evaluation of OPACs focus on evaluation of their retrieval function. Argues that the storage function is more important because the quality of information retrieval systems is dependent on the quality of stored information as well as the description and depth of indexing of stored information. States that OPACs should therefore be evaluated from the perspectives of both storage and retrieval functions. Examines 4 studies on criteria for evaluating OPACs and suggests a new evaluation framework based on the work of C.R. Hildreth
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:51:23
  3. Matsubayashi, M.: ¬The German cataloging rules (RAK) : an introduction and annotated bibliography (1996) 0.00
    7.939983E-4 = product of:
      0.015085968 = sum of:
        0.009051581 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060343873 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05263158 = coord(2/38)
    
    Date
    29. 8.1997 18:58:16
  4. Kawamura, K.; Kita, K.; Shiba, M.: Prospects for the Japanese version of the Broad System of Ordering : the design and uses of machine-readable form (1996) 0.00
    7.939983E-4 = product of:
      0.015085968 = sum of:
        0.009051581 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060343873 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05263158 = coord(2/38)
    
    Date
    29. 8.1997 18:58:16
  5. Kim, P.K.: ¬An automatic indexing of compound words based on mutual information for Korean text retrieval (1995) 0.00
    7.939983E-4 = product of:
      0.015085968 = sum of:
        0.009051581 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060343873 = product of:
          0.018103162 = sum of:
            0.018103162 = weight(_text_:29 in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018103162 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05822402 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05263158 = coord(2/38)
    
    Source
    Library and information science. 1995, no.34, S.29-38
  6. Matsushita, A.: Science Citation Index on CD-ROM (1992) 0.00
    2.8351726E-4 = product of:
      0.010773656 = sum of:
        0.010773656 = product of:
          0.021547312 = sum of:
            0.021547312 = weight(_text_:4 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021547312 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.47971863 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Source
    Pharmaceutical library bulletin. 37(1992) no.4, S.270-282
  7. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994) 0.00
    1.7541736E-4 = product of:
      0.0066658594 = sum of:
        0.0066658594 = product of:
          0.013331719 = sum of:
            0.013331719 = weight(_text_:4 in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013331719 = score(doc=3085,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.29681075 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
    Source
    Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 40(1994) no.4, S.160-172
  8. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.00
    1.5737115E-4 = product of:
      0.0059801037 = sum of:
        0.0059801037 = product of:
          0.01794031 = sum of:
            0.01794031 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01794031 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057961546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
  9. Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994) 0.00
    1.4175863E-4 = product of:
      0.005386828 = sum of:
        0.005386828 = product of:
          0.010773656 = sum of:
            0.010773656 = weight(_text_:4 in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010773656 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Source
    Online Kensaku. 15(1994) no.4, S.183-186
  10. Hirawa, M.: Role of keywords in the network searching era (1998) 0.00
    1.4175863E-4 = product of:
      0.005386828 = sum of:
        0.005386828 = product of:
          0.010773656 = sum of:
            0.010773656 = weight(_text_:4 in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010773656 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Date
    4. 4.1999 17:25:15
  11. Watanabe, T.: ¬An experimental OPAC system using NDC8 to improve subject access (1994) 0.00
    1.4175863E-4 = product of:
      0.005386828 = sum of:
        0.005386828 = product of:
          0.010773656 = sum of:
            0.010773656 = weight(_text_:4 in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010773656 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.23985931 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Source
    Toshokan-Kai. 46(1994) no.4, S.164-176
  12. Mirorikawa, N.: Structures of classification systems : hierarchical and multidimensional (1996) 0.00
    1.240388E-4 = product of:
      0.0047134743 = sum of:
        0.0047134743 = product of:
          0.009426949 = sum of:
            0.009426949 = weight(_text_:4 in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009426949 = score(doc=6583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.044916563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.016551789 = queryNorm
                0.2098769 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.02631579 = coord(1/38)
    
    Abstract
    Considers classification systems from a structural point of view. Distinguishes between 2 kinds of methods of categorization of classification systems: the first categorized by structure, either hierarchical or multidimensional; and the second by style of expression, either enumerative or sythetic. Identifies 4 leading classification systems according to their structures: DDC, LCC, UDC and Colon Classification. Focuses on DDC referring to 2 interpretatives of its structure, one of which is hierarchical and the other is partially multidimensional. Also relates this to the matter of interpretation of the notation '0', interpreted in one instance as 'generalities', and in another as 'coordination sign'