-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.010432388 = product of:
0.062594324 = sum of:
0.0031348949 = weight(_text_:in in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031348949 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.031631682 = weight(_text_:der in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031631682 = score(doc=3494,freq=28.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.6464053 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.027827747 = product of:
0.04174162 = sum of:
0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020965107 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.020776514 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020776514 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.13
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.0053841453 = product of:
0.03230487 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=4339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019323254 = score(doc=4339,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.007914863 = product of:
0.023744587 = sum of:
0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744587 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- Der Beitrag skizziert die Grundlagen der Arbeit mit Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken und erläutert die Grundbegriffe der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie. Schwerpunkte bilden die Ordnungsprinzipien und Strukturierungsmittel von Klassifikationen sowie die verschiedenen Klassifikationstypologien. Dabei werden vorzugsweise Beispiele aus Klassifikationen verwendet, die im deutschen Sprachraum verbreitet sind.
- Pages
- S.1-22
- Source
- Klassifikationen in Bibliotheken: Theorie - Anwendung - Nutzen. Hrsg.: H. Alex, G. Bee u. U. Junger
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.00
0.0039317645 = product of:
0.03538588 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.031803142 = product of:
0.04770471 = sum of:
0.023960123 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960123 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.023744587 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023744587 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Restrepo, G.: Zeit für eine neue Ordnung? (2022)
0.00
0.0031813877 = product of:
0.028632488 = sum of:
0.0044784215 = weight(_text_:in in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044784215 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.024154067 = weight(_text_:der in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024154067 = score(doc=361,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.4935974 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Das Periodensystem der Elemente steht seit über 100 Jahren für eine verlässliche Ordnung in der verwirrenden Vielfalt der chemischen Substanzen. Doch angesichts neuer Entdeckungen muss man sich fragen: Gibt es vielleicht etwas Besseres?
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2022, H.5, S.80-85
-
Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.00
0.0030961982 = product of:
0.018577188 = sum of:
0.0031348949 = weight(_text_:in in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031348949 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.008453923 = weight(_text_:der in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008453923 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.006988369 = product of:
0.020965107 = sum of:
0.020965107 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020965107 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.00
0.0029579736 = product of:
0.017747842 = sum of:
0.0067176316 = weight(_text_:in in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067176316 = score(doc=2650,freq=18.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.0060385168 = weight(_text_:der in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060385168 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.0049916925 = product of:
0.0149750775 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at the problems raised by maintaining an Area Table in a general scheme of classification. It examines the tools available to assist in producing a standardized listing and demonstrates how recent developments in the Universal Decimal Classification enable users to have a retrieval tool suitable for use in a networked environment which acts as both a gazetteer and a classification.
- Content
- 1. Introduction The representation of place in classification schemes presents a number of problems. This paper examines some of them and presents different ways in which a solution may be sought. Firstly, what is meant by place? The simple answer is a geographical area, large or small. The reality is not so simple. Place, or Topos to Aristotle was more than just an area, it was a state of mind. But even staying an the less philosophical plane, the way in which a place can be expressed is infinitely variable. Toponymy is a well defined field of study, comparable with taxonomy in the biological sciences. It comprehends the proper name by which any geographical entity is known, and part of the world, feature of earth's surface, organic aggregate (reef, forest) an organizational unit (country, borough, diocese), limits of Earth (poles, hemispheres) parts of Earth (oceans, continents), lakes, mountain passes, capital cities or sea parts.
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:17:11
- Footnote
- Ein Beitrag zur Problematik der Gestaltung geographischer Schlüssel zu Klassifikationssystemen
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
-
Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015)
0.00
0.0029122676 = product of:
0.026210409 = sum of:
0.0063334443 = weight(_text_:in in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0063334443 = score(doc=2282,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.019876964 = product of:
0.029815445 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.014840367 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014840367 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The structure of a classification system contributes in a variety of ways to representing semantic relationships between its topics in the context of subject authority control. We explore this claim using the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as a case study. The DDC links its classes into a notational hierarchy, supplemented by a network of relationships between topics, expressed in class descriptions and in the Relative Index (RI). Topics/subjects are expressed both by the natural language text of the caption and notes (including Manual notes) in a class description and by the controlled vocabulary of the RI's alphabetic index, which shows where topics are treated in the classificatory structure. The expression of relationships between topics depends on paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships between natural language terms in captions, notes, and RI terms; on the meaning of specific note types; and on references recorded between RI terms. The specific means used in the DDC for capturing hierarchical (including disciplinary), equivalence and associative relationships are surveyed.
- Date
- 8.11.2015 21:27:22
- Source
- Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
-
Kleineberg, M.: Klassifikation (2023)
0.00
0.0028335417 = product of:
0.025501875 = sum of:
0.0031348949 = weight(_text_:in in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031348949 = score(doc=783,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
0.02236698 = weight(_text_:der in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02236698 = score(doc=783,freq=14.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag nimmt eine informationswissenschaftliche Perspektive ein und betrachtet das Phänomen der Klassifikation als Methode und System der Wissensorganisation. Ein Klassifikationssystem wird dabei als Wissensorganisationssystem (engl. knowledge organization system) verstanden, das vor allem im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation zum Einsatz kommt, um dokumentarische Bezugseinheiten (DBE) mit einem kontrollierten Vokabular zu beschreiben (s. Kapitel B 1 Einführung Wissensorganisation). Als eine solche Dokumentationssprache zeichnet sich ein Klassifikationssystem typischerweise durch seine systematische Ordnung aus und dient der inhaltlichen Groberschließung, eignet sich aber auch als Aufstellungssystematik und Hilfsmittel bei der Recherche wie etwa als systematischer Sucheinstieg oder thematischer Filter für Treffermengen. Beim Information Retrieval liegt die Stärke der klassifikatorischen Erschließung durch das hohe Abstraktionsniveau in Überblicks- und Vollständigkeitsrecherchen.
- Source
- Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
-
Franz, S.; Lopatka, T.; Kunze, G.; Meyn, N.; Strupler, N.: Un/Doing Classification : Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme zwischen Universalitätsanspruch und reduktionistischer Wissensorganisation (2022)
0.00
0.002710001 = product of:
0.02439001 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=675,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019323254 = score(doc=675,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Der multiperspektivische Beitrag analysiert mit einem intersektionalen und qualitativen Ansatz diskriminierende Begriffe, Auslassungen und implizit abwertende Strukturen bibliothekarischer Klassifikationen des Globalen Nordens. Am Beispiel der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) werden rassistische und sexistische Schnitt- sowie Leerstellen in der Repräsentation queerer Lebens-, Liebes- und Lustentwürfe aufgezeigt. Mögliche Lösungen unter Einbeziehung der Communitys runden den Beitrag ab.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in enem Themenheft 'Critical Library Perspectives'.
-
Gödert, W.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme und on-line-Kataloge : Grundlagen und Anwendungen (1987)
0.00
0.0026555446 = product of:
0.023899902 = sum of:
0.007165474 = weight(_text_:in in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007165474 = score(doc=4576,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.016734429 = weight(_text_:der in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016734429 = score(doc=4576,freq=6.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag beabsichtigen wir, einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie zu geben. Die Darstellung ist angelehnt an die 1985 erschienene Norm DIN 32 705,Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen', stellt jedoch die Problematik bibliothekarischer Klassifikationssysteme in den Vordergrund. In einem zweiten Teil beschäftigen wir uns mit Problemen von Klassifikationssystemen in typischen bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf dem Online-Katalog; es wird ein Vorschlag zur Verwendung von Facettenklassifikationen diskutiert. Abschließend werden Fragen der kooperativen klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung gestreift.
-
Kaula, P.N.: Canons in analytico-synthetic classification (1979)
0.00
0.0025451102 = product of:
0.02290599 = sum of:
0.003582737 = weight(_text_:in in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003582737 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.019323254 = weight(_text_:der in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019323254 = score(doc=1428,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017)
0.00
0.0024847728 = product of:
0.014908636 = sum of:
0.003878427 = weight(_text_:in in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003878427 = score(doc=3849,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.0060385168 = weight(_text_:der in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060385168 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.0049916925 = product of:
0.0149750775 = sum of:
0.0149750775 = weight(_text_:29 in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149750775 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077061385 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
- Abstract
- Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Selected Papers from the International UDC Seminar 2017, Faceted Classification Today: Theory, Technology and End Users, 14-15 September, London UK.
- Date
- 29. 9.2017 18:58:02
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979)
0.00
0.0024001906 = product of:
0.021601714 = sum of:
0.007109274 = weight(_text_:in in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007109274 = score(doc=1427,freq=14.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.01449244 = weight(_text_:der in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01449244 = score(doc=1427,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986)
0.00
0.0022778746 = product of:
0.020500872 = sum of:
0.006008433 = weight(_text_:in in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006008433 = score(doc=1555,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.01449244 = weight(_text_:der in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01449244 = score(doc=1555,freq=8.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
-
Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990)
0.00
0.002207394 = product of:
0.019866545 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.01449244 = weight(_text_:der in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01449244 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Source
- Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
-
Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969)
0.00
0.0020811511 = product of:
0.01873036 = sum of:
0.0050667557 = weight(_text_:in in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0050667557 = score(doc=2020,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.013663604 = weight(_text_:der in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013663604 = score(doc=2020,freq=4.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Content
- Überblick über Aufgaben und Aufbau eines Thesaurus. Aufwand für Herstellung von Thesauri. Begriffe und Begriffsbenennungen. Klassifikationssystem und Thesaurus und ihre Funktionen in einem Dokumentationssystem. Thesaurus-Struktur. Thesaurus-Format. Arbeitsablauf der Thesaurus-Herstellung. Regeln für Begriffsbenennungen, Rechtschreibung u.ä. Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. Thesauri als Grundlage für kooperative Dokumentation.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: ZfBB 18(1970) S.130-133 (L. Bösing)
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.00
0.0019162666 = product of:
0.0172464 = sum of:
0.0053741056 = weight(_text_:in in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053741056 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.011872293 = product of:
0.03561688 = sum of:
0.03561688 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561688 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.076713994 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.2, S.129-134.
-
Scerri, E.R.: ¬The periodic table : its story and its significance (2007)
0.00
0.0018410478 = product of:
0.01656943 = sum of:
0.0057001 = weight(_text_:in in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057001 = score(doc=2492,freq=36.0), product of:
0.029798867 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.1912858 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.01086933 = weight(_text_:der in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01086933 = score(doc=2492,freq=18.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.22211882 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
- Abstract
- The periodic table is one of the most potent icons in science. It lies at the core of chemistry and embodies the most fundamental principles of the field. The one definitive text on the development of the periodic table by van Spronsen (1969), has been out of print for a considerable time. The present book provides a successor to van Spronsen, but goes further in giving an evaluation of the extent to which modern physics has, or has not, explained the periodic system. The book is written in a lively style to appeal to experts and interested lay-persons alike. The Periodic Table begins with an overview of the importance of the periodic table and of the elements and it examines the manner in which the term 'element' has been interpreted by chemists and philosophers. The book then turns to a systematic account of the early developments that led to the classification of the elements including the work of Lavoisier, Boyle and Dalton and Cannizzaro. The precursors to the periodic system, like Dobereiner and Gmelin, are discussed. In chapter 3 the discovery of the periodic system by six independent scientists is examined in detail. Two chapters are devoted to the discoveries of Mendeleev, the leading discoverer, including his predictions of new elements and his accommodation of already existing elements. Chapters 6 and 7 consider the impact of physics including the discoveries of radioactivity and isotopy and successive theories of the electron including Bohr's quantum theoretical approach. Chapter 8 discusses the response to the new physical theories by chemists such as Lewis and Bury who were able to draw on detailed chemical knowledge to correct some of the early electronic configurations published by Bohr and others. Chapter 9 provides a critical analysis of the extent to which modern quantum mechanics is, or is not, able to explain the periodic system from first principles. Finally, chapter 10 considers the way that the elements evolved following the Big Bang and in the interior of stars. The book closes with an examination of further chemical aspects including lesser known trends within the periodic system such as the knight's move relationship and secondary periodicity, as well at attempts to explain such trends.
- BK
- 35.01 / Geschichte der Chemie
- Classification
- VB 2400 Chemie und Pharmazie / Bibliographien und Nachschlagewerke, Geschichte und Didaktik der Chemie und Pharmazie, Betriebssicherheit / Geschichte der Chemie und Pharmazie / Geschichte einzelner Probleme und Teilgebiete der Chemie und Pharmazie / Allgemeines
35.01 / Geschichte der Chemie
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland): "The book is about the classification of chemical elements known as the periodical system. It is described as "one of the most potent icons in science [.] One sees periodic tables everywhere: in industrial labs, workshops, academic labs, and of course, lecture halls" (p. xiii). Among all taxonomies in all domains, there is probably none more respected and more useful than this one. As Scerri states (p. 25): The periodic table ranks as one of the most fruitful and unifying ideas in the whole of modern science, comparable perhaps with Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Unlike such theories as Newtonian mechanics, the periodic table has not been falsified by developments in modern physics but has evolved while remaining essentially unchanged. After evolving for nearly 150 years through the work of numerous individuals, the periodic table remains at the heart of chemistry. This is mainly because it is of immense practical benefit for making predictions about all manner of chemical and physical properties of the elements and possibilities for bond formation. The periodic system provides the basic criteria for organizing knowledge about all the material stuff in the entire universe. It is thus a model that anybody with interests in knowledge organization (KO) should know. Knowledge about the history, philosophy and status of the periodic system also provides important insight for knowledge organization in general. . . . Scerri's book demonstrates how one of the most important classification systems has evolved and what kinds of conceptualizations and classification criteria are at work in it. It is probably the best book about the best classification system ever constructed. It should belong to any library supporting teaching and research in knowledge organization."
- Object
- Periodensystem der Elemente
- RVK
- VB 2400 Chemie und Pharmazie / Bibliographien und Nachschlagewerke, Geschichte und Didaktik der Chemie und Pharmazie, Betriebssicherheit / Geschichte der Chemie und Pharmazie / Geschichte einzelner Probleme und Teilgebiete der Chemie und Pharmazie / Allgemeines
-
Henrichs, N.: Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Bibliotheksklassifikation? (1979)
0.00
0.0018003378 = product of:
0.03240608 = sum of:
0.03240608 = weight(_text_:der in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03240608 = score(doc=1423,freq=10.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.6622304 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
- Source
- Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
-
Weinberger, O.: Begriffsstruktur und Klassifikation (1980)
0.00
0.0017573157 = product of:
0.031631682 = sum of:
0.031631682 = weight(_text_:der in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031631682 = score(doc=1440,freq=28.0), product of:
0.048934754 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021906832 = queryNorm
0.6464053 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
- Abstract
- Klassifikation kann sich auf verschiedene Gegenstandsbereiche beziehen. Sie ist im Prinzip eine extensionale Vorgangsweise resp. ein extensionales Gebilde auch dann, wenn ihr Gegenstand begriffliche Gebilde bzw. Wissen (Wissensbestandteile) sind. Die Erstellung dieses extensionalen Gebildes, das wir 'Klassat' nennen, beruht auf begrifflichen Analysen. Die Probleme der Begriffstrukturen, der Definitionen und der verschiedenen Eigentümlichkeiten gewisser Begriffe der pragmatischen Sprachen stellen daher Grundlagenprobleme der Klassifikationstheorie dar. Hieraus ergibt sich die Aufgabenstellung: Skizzzierung der logischen Grundstruktur der Klassifikation, Hinweis auf die Relevanz methodologischer Momente der Problemsituation für das Klassieren und auf gewisse strukturelle und semantische Eigentümlichkeiten der Begriffsapparatur der modernen Wissenschaften und der Umgangssprache, die Probleme der Klassifizierungsaufgaben mit such bringen und die bewirken, daß die Klassifikationen oft als praktische Annäherungen anzusehen sind
- Source
- Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
