Search (3687 results, page 1 of 185)

  1. Mittler, E.; Schulz, M.: ProPrint world-wide print-on-demand services for study and research (2004) 0.20 
    0.19867632 = product of:
  0.39735264 = sum of:
    0.39735264 = sum of:
      0.31737438 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.31737438 = score(doc=2855,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.7332423 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
      0.07997826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07997826 = score(doc=2855,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The libraries of more and more universities and research institutions have local digital repositories, and the amount of material is increasing every day. Users need an integrated retrieval interface that allows aggregated searching across multiple document servers without having to resort to manual processes. ProPrint offers an on-demand print service within Germany for over 2,000 monographs and 1,000 journals. Partners worldwide are now invited to join.
    Date
    8.10.2004 14:22:14
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.227-230
  2. Bibliographie zu den Biographischen Archiven : mit einem Essay von Hans Wollschläger (1994) 0.15 
    0.14766075 = sum of:
  0.12645331 = product of:
    0.3793599 = sum of:
      0.3793599 = weight(_text_:2200 in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.3793599 = score(doc=1711,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.45948994 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.8256109 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021207437 = product of:
    0.042414874 = sum of:
      0.042414874 = weight(_text_:22 in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042414874 = score(doc=1711,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    NC 2200 (BVB)
    Date
    21. 3.2008 12:22:03
    RVK
    NC 2200 (BVB)
  3. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.12 
    0.116852365 = product of:
  0.23370473 = sum of:
    0.23370473 = sum of:
      0.198359 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.198359 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.45827642 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.03534573 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03534573 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10407697 = sum of:
  0.08286953 = product of:
    0.24860857 = sum of:
      0.24860857 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24860857 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44234982 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.021207437 = product of:
    0.042414874 = sum of:
      0.042414874 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042414874 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  5. Schmidt, D.; Allison, M.; Clark, K.; Jacobs, P.; Porta, M.: Guide to reference and information sources in plant biology (2005) 0.10 
    0.0991795 = product of:
  0.198359 = sum of:
    0.198359 = product of:
      0.396718 = sum of:
        0.396718 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 4588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.396718 = score(doc=4588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.91655284 = fieldWeight in 4588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This third edition contains nearly 1,000 annotated entries focus an core materials for botanists and plant biologists and includes greatly expanded coverage of web sites.
  6. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09 
    0.08673081 = sum of:
  0.06905794 = product of:
    0.20717382 = sum of:
      0.20717382 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20717382 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44234982 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017672865 = product of:
    0.03534573 = sum of:
      0.03534573 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03534573 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052176133 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  7. Lewandowski, D.: Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of web search engines using a representative query sample (2015) 0.08 
    0.0841566 = product of:
  0.1683132 = sum of:
    0.1683132 = product of:
      0.3366264 = sum of:
        0.3366264 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3366264 = score(doc=2157,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.7777209 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Search engine retrieval effectiveness studies are usually small scale, using only limited query samples. Furthermore, queries are selected by the researchers. We address these issues by taking a random representative sample of 1,000 informational and 1,000 navigational queries from a major German search engine and comparing Google's and Bing's results based on this sample. Jurors were found through crowdsourcing, and data were collected using specialized software, the Relevance Assessment Tool (RAT). We found that although Google outperforms Bing in both query types, the difference in the performance for informational queries was rather low. However, for navigational queries, Google found the correct answer in 95.3% of cases, whereas Bing only found the correct answer 76.6% of the time. We conclude that search engine performance on navigational queries is of great importance, because users in this case can clearly identify queries that have returned correct results. So, performance on this query type may contribute to explaining user satisfaction with search engines.
  8. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.08286953 = product of:
  0.16573906 = sum of:
    0.16573906 = product of:
      0.49721715 = sum of:
        0.49721715 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49721715 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44234982 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  9. Cronin, B.; Franks, S.: Trading cultures : Resource mobilization and service rendering in the life sciences as revealed in the journal article's paratext (2006) 0.08 
    0.079343595 = product of:
  0.15868719 = sum of:
    0.15868719 = product of:
      0.31737438 = sum of:
        0.31737438 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31737438 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.7332423 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Formal and informal modes of collaboration in life sciences research were explored paratextually. The bylines and acknowledgments of more than 1,000 research articles in the journal Cell were analyzed to reveal the strength of collegiate ties and the importance of material and ideational trading between both individuals and labs. Intense coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration were shown to be defining features of contemporary research in the life sciences.
  10. Tozer, J.: How long is the perfect book? : Bigger really is better. What the numbers say (2019) 0.08 
    0.079343595 = product of:
  0.15868719 = sum of:
    0.15868719 = product of:
      0.31737438 = sum of:
        0.31737438 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31737438 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.7332423 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    British novelist E.M. Forster once complained that long books "are usually overpraised" because "the reader wishes to convince others and himself that he has not wasted his time." To test his theory we collected reader ratings for 737 books tagged as "classic literature" on Goodreads.com, a review aggregator with 80m members. The bias towards chunky tomes was substantial. Slim volumes of 100 to 200 pages scored only 3.87 out of 5, whereas those over 1,000 pages scored 4.19. Longer is better, say the readers.
  11. Whyde, J.S.: Issues in the cataloging of commercially available videocassettes of television programs (1991) 0.07 
    0.07376443 = product of:
  0.14752886 = sum of:
    0.14752886 = product of:
      0.44258654 = sum of:
        0.44258654 = weight(_text_:2200 in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44258654 = score(doc=2199,freq=1.0), product of:
            0.45948994 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.96321267 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
              1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                1.0 = termFreq=1.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    2200
  12. Tufte, E.R.: ¬The visual display of quantitative information (1983) 0.07 
    0.07376443 = product of:
  0.14752886 = sum of:
    0.14752886 = product of:
      0.44258654 = sum of:
        0.44258654 = weight(_text_:2200 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44258654 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.45948994 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.96321267 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    MR 2200
    RVK
    MR 2200
  13. Kozak, M.; Iefremova, O.; Szkola, J.; Sas, D.: Do researchers provide public or institutional E-mail accounts as correspondence E-mails in scientific articles? (2015) 0.07 
    0.0701305 = product of:
  0.140261 = sum of:
    0.140261 = product of:
      0.280522 = sum of:
        0.280522 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.280522 = score(doc=2226,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.64810073 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Whether one should use a public e-mail account (e.g., Gmail, Yahoo!) or an institutional one (e.g., @wsiz.rzeszow.pl, @medicine.ox.ac.uk) as an address for correspondence is an important aspect of scientific communication. Some authors consider that public e-mail services are unprofessional and insecure, whereas others say that, in a dynamically changing working environment, public e-mail addresses allow readers to contact authors long after they have changed their workplace. To shed light on this issue, we analyzed how often authors of scientific papers provided e-mail addresses that were either public or institution based. We selected from the Web of Science database 1,000 frequently cited and 1,000 infrequently cited articles (all of the latter were noncited articles) published in 2000, 2005, and 2010, and from these we analyzed 26,937 e-mail addresses. The results showed that approximately three fourths of these addresses were institutional, but there was an increasing trend toward using public e-mail addresses over the period studied. No significant differences were found between frequently and infrequently cited papers in this respect. Further research is now needed to access the motivations and perceptions of scholars when it comes to their use of either public or institutional e-mail accounts.
  14. #220 0.07 
    0.06998097 = product of:
  0.13996194 = sum of:
    0.13996194 = product of:
      0.2799239 = sum of:
        0.2799239 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2799239 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  15. #1387 0.07 
    0.06998097 = product of:
  0.13996194 = sum of:
    0.13996194 = product of:
      0.2799239 = sum of:
        0.2799239 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2799239 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  16. #2103 0.07 
    0.06998097 = product of:
  0.13996194 = sum of:
    0.13996194 = product of:
      0.2799239 = sum of:
        0.2799239 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2799239 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18271193 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  17. Bundza, M.: ¬The choice is yours! : researchers assign subject metadata to their own materials in institutional repositories (2014) 0.07 
    0.06942565 = product of:
  0.1388513 = sum of:
    0.1388513 = product of:
      0.2777026 = sum of:
        0.2777026 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2777026 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.641587 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Digital Commons platform for institutional repositories provides a three-tiered taxonomy of academic disciplines for each item submitted to the repository. Since faculty and departmental administrators across campuses are encouraged to submit materials to the institutional repository themselves, they must also assign disciplines or subject categories for their own work. The expandable drop-down menu of about 1,000 categories is easy to use, and facilitates the growth of the institutional repository and access to the materials through the Internet.
  18. Bianchini, C.; Zappalà, P.: ISBD and mechanical musical devices : a case study of the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Italy (2014) 0.07 
    0.06942565 = product of:
  0.1388513 = sum of:
    0.1388513 = product of:
      0.2777026 = sum of:
        0.2777026 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 2002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2777026 = score(doc=2002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.641587 = fieldWeight in 2002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The collection of nearly 1,000 piano rolls housed within the Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage, University of Pavia, Cremona, Italy, remains in need of preservation. A digitalization project requires cataloging based on international cataloging standards. A distinction among instruments and media must be introduced and specific features of mechanical musical devices are to be identified. Four main classes of media have been identified: disks, pinned barrels, books, and rolls. Lastly, morphological peculiarities of the media must be examined to establish their correct and complete description within the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) areas.
  19. Lewandowski, D.; Kerkmann, F.; Rümmele, S.; Sünkler, S.: ¬An empirical investigation on search engine ad disclosure (2018) 0.07 
    0.06942565 = product of:
  0.1388513 = sum of:
    0.1388513 = product of:
      0.2777026 = sum of:
        0.2777026 = weight(_text_:1,000 in 4115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2777026 = score(doc=4115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.432837 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.641587 = fieldWeight in 4115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.29569 = idf(docFreq=29, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4115)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This representative study of German search engine users (N?=?1,000) focuses on the ability of users to distinguish between organic results and advertisements on Google results pages. We combine questions about Google's business with task-based studies in which users were asked to distinguish between ads and organic results in screenshots of results pages. We find that only a small percentage of users can reliably distinguish between ads and organic results, and that user knowledge of Google's business model is very limited. We conclude that ads are insufficiently labelled as such, and that many users may click on ads assuming that they are selecting organic results.
  20. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.06905794 = product of:
  0.13811588 = sum of:
    0.13811588 = product of:
      0.41434765 = sum of:
        0.41434765 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.41434765 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44234982 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052176133 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3074
  • m 357
  • el 164
  • s 140
  • b 40
  • x 35
  • i 24
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications