Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  1. Egghe, L.; Bornmann, L.: Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013) 0.04
    0.03797428 = product of:
      0.09493569 = sum of:
        0.006114541 = weight(_text_:e in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006114541 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
        0.08882115 = weight(_text_:69 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08882115 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.42368966 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.3, S.411-416
  2. Egghe, L.: Mathematical study of h-index sequences (2009) 0.03
    0.027124483 = product of:
      0.067811206 = sum of:
        0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00436753 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
        0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063443676 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper studies mathematical properties of h-index sequences as developed by Liang [Liang, L. (2006). h-Index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153-159]. For practical reasons, Liming studies such sequences where the time goes backwards while it is more logical to use the time going forward (real career periods). Both type of h-index sequences are studied here and their interrelations are revealed. We show cases where these sequences are convex, linear and concave. We also show that, when one of the sequences is convex then the other one is concave, showing that the reverse-time sequence, in general, cannot be used to derive similar properties of the (difficult to obtain) forward time sequence. We show that both sequences are the same if and only if the author produces the same number of papers per year. If the author produces an increasing number of papers per year, then Liang's h-sequences are above the "normal" ones. All these results are also valid for g- and R-sequences. The results are confirmed by the h-, g- and R-sequences (forward and reverse time) of the author.
    Language
    e
  3. Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007) 0.02
    0.015447149 = product of:
      0.03861787 = sum of:
        0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006988047 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
        0.031629823 = product of:
          0.09488946 = sum of:
            0.09488946 = weight(_text_:evolution in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09488946 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    When there are a group of articles and the present time is fixed we can determine the unique number h being the number of articles that received h or more citations while the other articles received a number of citations which is not larger than h. In this article, the time dependence of the h-index is determined. This is important to describe the expected career evolution of a scientist's work or of a journal's production in a fixed year.
    Language
    e
  4. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.01
    0.013863307 = product of:
      0.034658268 = sum of:
        0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00873506 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.02592321 = product of:
          0.05184642 = sum of:
            0.05184642 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05184642 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Language
    e
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.01
    0.011585359 = product of:
      0.028963398 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.023722364 = product of:
          0.07116709 = sum of:
            0.07116709 = weight(_text_:evolution in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07116709 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
    Language
    e
  6. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01
    0.008317985 = product of:
      0.020794962 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
        0.015553925 = product of:
          0.03110785 = sum of:
            0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03110785 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  7. Egghe, L.: ¬A universal method of information retrieval evaluation : the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface (2004) 0.01
    0.008317985 = product of:
      0.020794962 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
        0.015553925 = product of:
          0.03110785 = sum of:
            0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03110785 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2004 19:17:22
    Language
    e
  8. Egghe, L.: Little science, big science and beyond (1994) 0.00
    0.0024458165 = product of:
      0.012229082 = sum of:
        0.012229082 = weight(_text_:e in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012229082 = score(doc=6883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : the second special issue (2006) 0.00
    0.0020964143 = product of:
      0.010482071 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=7119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  10. Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : origins and consequences (2005) 0.00
    0.0020964143 = product of:
      0.010482071 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=1910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  11. Egghe, L.: Special features of the author - publication relationship and a new explanation of Lotka's law based on convolution theory (1994) 0.00
    0.0020964143 = product of:
      0.010482071 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013) 0.00
    0.0020964143 = product of:
      0.010482071 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  13. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.00
    0.0020964143 = product of:
      0.010482071 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  14. Egghe, L.: ¬A noninformetric analysis of the relationship between citation age and journal productivity (2001) 0.00
    0.0018155482 = product of:
      0.009077741 = sum of:
        0.009077741 = weight(_text_:e in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009077741 = score(doc=5685,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.16503859 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A problem, raised by Wallace (JASIS, 37,136-145,1986), on the relation between the journal's median citation age and its number of articles is studied. Leaving open the problem as such, we give a statistical explanation of this relationship, when replacing "median" by "mean" in Wallace's problem. The cloud of points, found by Wallace, is explained in this sense that the points are scattered over the area in first quadrant, limited by a curve of the form y=1 + E/x**2 where E is a constant. This curve is obtained by using the Central Limit Theorem in statistics and, hence, has no intrinsic informetric foundation. The article closes with some reflections on explanations of regularities in informetrics, based on statistical, probabilistic or informetric results, or on a combination thereof
    Language
    e
  15. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.00
    0.001747012 = product of:
      0.00873506 = sum of:
        0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00873506 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  16. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00
    0.0015129567 = product of:
      0.0075647836 = sum of:
        0.0075647836 = weight(_text_:e in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0075647836 = score(doc=5226,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Classification
    AZC (E)
    GHBS
    AZC (E)
    Language
    e
  17. Egghe, L.; Ravichandra Rao, I.K.: Duality revisited : construction of fractional frequency distributions based on two dual Lotka laws (2002) 0.00
    0.0014823888 = product of:
      0.0074119437 = sum of:
        0.0074119437 = weight(_text_:e in 1006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074119437 = score(doc=1006,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 1006, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1006)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Fractional frequency distributions of, for example, authors with a certain (fractional) number of papers are very irregular and, therefore, not easy to model or to explain. This article gives a first attempt to this by assuming two simple Lotka laws (with exponent 2): one for the number of authors with n papers (total count here) and one for the number of papers with n authors, n E N. Based an an earlier made convolution model of Egghe, interpreted and reworked now for discrete scores, we are able to produce theoretical fractional frequency distributions with only one parameter, which are in very close agreement with the practical ones as found in a large dataset produced earlier by Rao. The article also shows that (irregular) fractional frequency distributions are a consequence of Lotka's law, and are not examples of breakdowns of this famous historical law.
    Language
    e
  18. Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010) 0.00
    0.0014823888 = product of:
      0.0074119437 = sum of:
        0.0074119437 = weight(_text_:e in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074119437 = score(doc=3336,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
    Language
    e
  19. Egghe, L.: ¬The amount of actions needed for shelving and reshelving (1996) 0.00
    0.0013976095 = product of:
      0.006988047 = sum of:
        0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006988047 = score(doc=4394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e
  20. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.00
    0.0013976095 = product of:
      0.006988047 = sum of:
        0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006988047 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    e