Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  1. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Interestingness and the essence of citation : Thomas Reid and bibliographic description (2013) 0.06 
    0.0630575 = product of:
  0.10509582 = sum of:
    0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052410355 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
    0.07613242 = weight(_text_:69 in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07613242 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
    0.023722364 = product of:
      0.07116709 = sum of:
        0.07116709 = weight(_text_:evolution in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07116709 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide a new insight into the reasons why authors cite. Design/methodology/approach The authors argue that, based on philosophical ideas about the essence of things, pure rational thinking about the role of citations leads to the answer. Findings - Citations originate from the interestingness of the investigated phenomenon. The essence of citation lies in the interaction between different ideas or perspectives on a phenomenon addressed in the citing as well as in the cited articles. Research limitations/implications - The findings only apply to ethical (not whimsical or self-serving) citations. As such citations reflect interactions of scientific ideas, they can reveal the evolution of science, revive the cognitive process of an investigated scientific phenomenon and reveal political and economic factors influencing the development of science. Originality/value - This article is the first to propose interestingness and the interaction of ideas as the basic reason for citing. This view on citations allows reverse engineering from citations to ideas and hence becomes useful for science policy.
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.4, S.580-589
  2. Yang, B.; Rousseau, R.; Wang, X.; Huang, S.: How important is scientific software in bioinformatics research? : a comparative study between international and Chinese research communities (2018) 0.03 
    0.027124483 = product of:
  0.067811206 = sum of:
    0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00436753 = score(doc=4461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
    0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 4461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063443676 = score(doc=4461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4461)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.9, S.1122-1133
  3. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.01 
    0.013863307 = product of:
  0.034658268 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
    0.02592321 = product of:
      0.05184642 = sum of:
        0.05184642 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05184642 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Language
    e
  4. Liu, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Towards a representation of diffusion and interaction of scientific ideas : the case of fiber optics communication (2012) 0.01 
    0.013516255 = product of:
  0.033790637 = sum of:
    0.006114541 = weight(_text_:e in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006114541 = score(doc=2723,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
    0.027676094 = product of:
      0.08302828 = sum of:
        0.08302828 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08302828 = score(doc=2723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 2723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2723)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The research question studied in this contribution is how to find an adequate representation to describe the diffusion of scientific ideas over time. We claim that citation data, at least of articles that act as concept symbols, can be considered to contain this information. As a case study we show how the founding article by Nobel Prize winner Kao illustrates the evolution of the field of fiber optics communication. We use a continuous description of discrete citation data in order to accentuate turning points and breakthroughs in the history of this field. Applying the principles explained in this contribution informetrics may reveal the trajectories along which science is developing.
    Language
    e
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.01 
    0.011585359 = product of:
  0.028963398 = sum of:
    0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052410355 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
    0.023722364 = product of:
      0.07116709 = sum of:
        0.07116709 = weight(_text_:evolution in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07116709 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
    Language
    e
  6. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.01 
    0.008317985 = product of:
  0.020794962 = sum of:
    0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052410355 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
    0.015553925 = product of:
      0.03110785 = sum of:
        0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03110785 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  7. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01 
    0.008317985 = product of:
  0.020794962 = sum of:
    0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052410355 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
    0.015553925 = product of:
      0.03110785 = sum of:
        0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03110785 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
    Language
    e
  8. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061242315 = product of:
  0.015310579 = sum of:
    0.004941296 = weight(_text_:e in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004941296 = score(doc=5171,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
    0.010369283 = product of:
      0.020738566 = sum of:
        0.020738566 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020738566 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Language
    e
  9. Rousseau, R.: ¬A table for estimating the exponent in Lotka's law (1993) 0.00 
    0.002795219 = product of:
  0.013976094 = sum of:
    0.013976094 = weight(_text_:e in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013976094 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  10. Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Metric-wiseness (2015) 0.00 
    0.0024458165 = product of:
  0.012229082 = sum of:
    0.012229082 = weight(_text_:e in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012229082 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  11. Rousseau, R.: Use of an existing thesaurus in a knowledge based indexing and retrieval system (1991) 0.00 
    0.0020964143 = product of:
  0.010482071 = sum of:
    0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010482071 = score(doc=3007,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  12. Rousseau, R.: Bradford curves (1994) 0.00 
    0.0020964143 = product of:
  0.010482071 = sum of:
    0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 7304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010482071 = score(doc=7304,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 7304, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7304)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  13. Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 0.00 
    0.0020964143 = product of:
  0.010482071 = sum of:
    0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010482071 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  14. Rousseau, R.: Informetric laws (2009) 0.00 
    0.0019765184 = product of:
  0.009882592 = sum of:
    0.009882592 = weight(_text_:e in 3795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009882592 = score(doc=3795,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 3795, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3795)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Language
    e
  15. Rousseau, R.: On Egghe's construction of Lorenz curves (2007) 0.00 
    0.001747012 = product of:
  0.00873506 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  16. Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018) 0.00 
    0.0015129567 = product of:
  0.0075647836 = sum of:
    0.0075647836 = weight(_text_:e in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075647836 = score(doc=5226,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Classification
    AZC (E)
    GHBS
    AZC (E)
    Language
    e
  17. Harvey, L.; Rousseau, R.: Development of text-editing skill : from semantic and syntactic mappings to procedures (1995) 0.00 
    0.0013976095 = product of:
  0.006988047 = sum of:
    0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006988047 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  18. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.00 
    0.0013976095 = product of:
  0.006988047 = sum of:
    0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006988047 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  19. Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006) 0.00 
    0.0013976095 = product of:
  0.006988047 = sum of:
    0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006988047 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e
  20. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A theoretical study of recall and precision using a topological approach to information retrieval (1998) 0.00 
    0.0013976095 = product of:
  0.006988047 = sum of:
    0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006988047 = score(doc=3267,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Language
    e

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 55
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications