Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0023722365 = product of:
  0.011861182 = sum of:
    0.011861182 = product of:
      0.035583545 = sum of:
        0.035583545 = weight(_text_:evolution in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035583545 = score(doc=480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.17556013 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote

Cole's reliance upon Donald's Theory of Mind is limiting; it represents a major weakness of the book. Donald's Theory of Mind has been an influential model in evolutionary psychology, appearing in his 1991 book Origins of the Modern Mind: Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition (Harvard University Press). Donald's approach is a top-down, conceptual model that explicates what makes the human mind different and exceptional from other animal intelligences. However, there are other alternative, useful, science-based models of animal and human cognition that begin with a bottom-up approach to understanding the building blocks of cognition shared in common by humans and other "intelligent" animals. For example, in "A Bottom-Up Approach to the Primate Mind," Frans B.M. de Waal and Pier Francesco Ferrari note that neurophysiological studies show that specific neuron assemblies in the rat hippocampus are active during memory retrieval and that those same assemblies predict future choices. This would suggest that episodic memory and future orientation aren't as advanced a process as Donald posits in his Theory of Mind. Also, neuroimaging studies in humans show that the cortical areas active during observations of another's actions are related in position and structure to those areas identified as containing mirror neurons in macaques. Could this point to a physiological basis for imitation? ... (Scott Curtis)"

0.0010482072 = product of:
  0.0052410355 = sum of:
    0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 2605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052410355 = score(doc=2605,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2605, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2605)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Language

e

8.73506E-4 = product of:
  0.00436753 = sum of:
    0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00436753 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Language

e

6.9880474E-4 = product of:
  0.0034940236 = sum of:
    0.0034940236 = weight(_text_:e in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034940236 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Language

e