Search (497 results, page 1 of 25)

0.054248966 = product of:
  0.13562241 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.12688735 = weight(_text_:69 in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12688735 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.6052709 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

Pages

69 S

0.05254791 = product of:
  0.08757985 = sum of:
    0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00436753 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
    0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063443676 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
    0.019768637 = product of:
      0.05930591 = sum of:
        0.05930591 = weight(_text_:evolution in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05930591 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Language

e

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.158-167

0.048463687 = product of:
  0.08077281 = sum of:
    0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00436753 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
    0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063443676 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
    0.012961605 = product of:
      0.02592321 = sum of:
        0.02592321 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02592321 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Language

e

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.674-687

0.03877095 = product of:
  0.06461825 = sum of:
    0.0034940236 = weight(_text_:e in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0034940236 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
    0.050754942 = weight(_text_:69 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050754942 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.24210837 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
    0.010369283 = product of:
      0.020738566 = sum of:
        0.020738566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020738566 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Language

e

Source

Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.557-575

0.029078213 = product of:
  0.048463687 = sum of:
    0.0026205177 = weight(_text_:e in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026205177 = score(doc=6494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.04764253 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
    0.03806621 = weight(_text_:69 in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03806621 = score(doc=6494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.18158129 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
    0.0077769626 = product of:
      0.015553925 = sum of:
        0.015553925 = weight(_text_:22 in 6494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015553925 = score(doc=6494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 6494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

Die Web-Revolution frisst ihre Kinder. Reihenweise sind in den vergangenen Monaten viel versprechende Dotcom-Unternehmen eingegangen. Zahllose hoch dotierte Mitarbeiter haben ihren Job verloren. Und auch in der Internet-Presse sind im Zuge stark rückläufiger Anzeigenumsätze zahlreiche Pleiten zu beklagen. Jüngstes Opfer ist das US-Magazin "The Industry Standard". Diese Woche erschien die vorerst letzte Ausgabe des renommiertesten amerikanischen New-Economy-Blattes. Der San Franciscoer Verlag Standard Media International steht vor der Zahlungsunfähigkeit und wird voraussichtlich Gläubigerschutz beantragen - was in etwa dem deutschen Insolvenzverfahren entspricht. Zuvor waren Finanzierungsgespräche mit dem Hauptanteilseigner, der Bostoner Verlagsgruppe International Data Group (IDG), gescheitert. Bis auf eine Minimannschaft von sechs bis 20 Mitarbeitern, die weiterhin die Online-Ausgabe des Magazins produzieren sollen, verlieren alle 180, Angestellten ihren Job. Das Gros der Mitarbeiter war vergangene Woche vorsichtshalber schon mal in den Zwangsurlaub geschickt worden. Die Standard-Pleite kommt nicht ganz überraschend: Bereits im Februar hatte das Flaggschiff der amerikanischen New-Economy-Medien im Zuge des rückläufigen Anzeigenaufkommens 69 Angestellte entlassen müssen. Im Januar war eine erste Massenkündigungswelle erfolgt. In den vergangenen Monaten hat sich die Situation nun nochmals deutlich zugespitzt. Seit Jahresbeginn ist die Zahl der gebuchten Anzeigen um 75 Prozent gefallen. Den drastischen Werberückgang dokumentierte der beständig schwindende Umfang des Wochenmagazins: Im Februar 2000 zählte der Standard noch stolze 228 Seiten. Dieses Frühjahr kam das Heft gerade noch auf 120 Seiten, Mitte Mai nur noch auf 80. Kein anderes Internet-Magazin hat den dramatischen Aufstieg und Niedergang der Online-Ökonomie so durchlitten wie der Industry Standard.
"Wir sind sehr enttäuscht, dass unsere finanzielle Situation diese Maßnahmen erfordert. Wir hoffen dennoch weiter, dass wir unsere Aktiva verkaufen können", ließ Standard Media International in einer Pressemitteilung verlauten. IDG kommentierte den Rückzug bislang nicht. Der Standard ist kein Einzelfall. Seit Monaten leiden auch amerikanische Konkurrenzblätter wie Red Herring oder Wired unter der Werbeflaute. Red Herring verschlankte sich binnen eines Jahres etwa von 350 Seiten Umfang auf 120 Seiten und musste bereits Ende vergangenen Jahres mehr als 20 Angestellte entlassen. Die Kult-IT-Bibel Wired konnte zu ihren besten Zeiten allein dem Inhaltsverzeichnis 72 Anzeigenseiten vorschalten. Ein Stapel der sechs wichtigsten amerikanischen Internet-Magazine - die alle aus San Francisco stammen - hatte im Juni vergangenen Jahres rund, fünf Kilogramm gewogen. Aktuelle Ausgaben von Wired, eCompany, Red Herring, Business 2.0, Upside und eben The Industry Standard bringen nun zusammen nicht mal mehr die Hälfte auf die Waage. In Deutschland ist die Situation der Web-Medien nicht besser: In den vergangenen Wochen mussten neben dem Milchstraßen-Titel Net-Business die zwei Münchner Objekte Business 2.0 und NetInvestor sowie die Handelsblatt-Publikation E-Business aufgeben. Die Zeitschriften eMarket und Tomorrow haben jüngst ihren Veröffentlichungsrhythmus halbiert: eMarket erscheint nur noch zweiwöchentlieh, Tomorrow nur noch monatlich. Bei Standard Media International in San Francisco sucht man derweil nach einem Käufer für den jetzt höchst defizitären Industry Standard. Die Online-Ausgabe der einstigen Cash-Cow", TheStandard.com, soll bis auf weiteres in einer abgespeckten Version weitergeführt werden. Amerikanischen Medienberichten zufolge sollen im Verlag sogar Pläne für die Wiederbelebung eines völlig neukonzipierten Magazins geschmiedet werden

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22

0.028871495 = product of:
  0.07217874 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=3038,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
    0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063443676 = score(doc=3038,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Im zweiten Projektjahr hat sich das HRSM-Projekt e-Infrastructures Austria nicht nur zu einer breit akzeptierten Plattform für Vernetzungsforen, Sitzungen und Weiterbildungseinheiten etabliert, sondern es stehen auch erste Deliverables zur Verfügung, die dem Gesamtziel, dem Aufbau von nachhaltigen Archivinfrastrukturen und der Konsolidierung von Wissen im Bereich Sicherung und Bereitstellung von digitalen Daten, dienlich sind. Anfang 2015 wurde im Rahmen des Projekts eine Befragung durchgeführt, welche das wissenschaftliche und künstlerisch-wissenschaftliche Personal 20 öffentlicher Universitäten sowie drei außeruniversitärer Forschungseinrichtungen in Österreich umfasste. Ziel war es, den praktischen Umgang mit Forschungsdaten zu erheben und das Serviceangebot in diesem Bereich auf die vorhandenen Bedürfnisse abzustimmen. Die Befragungsergebnisse zeigen einen deutlichen Nachholbedarf im Bereich des Datenmanagements. Der Aufbau der technischen Infrastruktur im Bereich Dokumentenserver (Projektsäule A) ist bei allen Partnern weit vorangeschritten, daher wird die Konzentration im letzten Projektjahr vor allem auf Säule B (Forschungsdaten) liegen. Der Forschungsdaten-Abschlussbericht bildet die Basis für eine ExpertInnengruppe, die sich mit der Frage der strategischen Ausrichtung für den Umgang mit Forschungsdaten und Forschungsdatenmanagement in Österreich beschäftigt. Projektsäule C (Wissensnetzwerk) erfährt insofern eine Stärkung, als für das letzte Projektjahr eine zentral organisierte, viertägige Veranstaltung "Fortbildungsseminar für Forschungsdaten und e-Infrastrukturen" für alle Projektpartner konzipiert wird.

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 69(2016) H.1, S.9-40

0.027124483 = product of:
  0.067811206 = sum of:
    0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00436753 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
    0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063443676 = score(doc=754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Open access (OA) journals distribute their content at no charge and use other means of funding the publication process. Publication fees or article-processing charges (APC)s have become the predominant means for funding professional OA publishing. We surveyed 1,038 authors who recently published articles in 74 OA journals that charge APCs stratified into seven discipline categories. Authors were asked about the source of funding for the APC, factors influencing their choice of a journal and past history publishing in OA and subscription journals. Additional information about the journal and the authors' country were obtained from the journal website. A total of 429 (41%) authors from 69 journals completed the survey. There were large differences in the source of funding among disciplines. Journals with impact factors charged higher APCs as did journals from disciplines where grant funding is plentiful. Fit, quality, and speed of publication were the most important factors in the authors' choice of a journal. OA was less important but a significant factor for many authors in their choice of a journal to publish. These findings are consistent with other research on OA publishing and suggest that OA publishing funded through APCs is likely to continue to grow.

Language

e

0.027124483 = product of:
  0.067811206 = sum of:
    0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00436753 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
    0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063443676 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.4, S.619-622

0.023170719 = product of:
  0.057926796 = sum of:
    0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010482071 = score(doc=2446,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
    0.047444727 = product of:
      0.14233418 = sum of:
        0.14233418 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14233418 = score(doc=2446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.7022405 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

0.022802958 = product of:
  0.057007395 = sum of:
    0.01747012 = weight(_text_:e in 810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01747012 = score(doc=810,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.31761688 = fieldWeight in 810, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=810)
    0.039537273 = product of:
      0.11861182 = sum of:
        0.11861182 = weight(_text_:evolution in 810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11861182 = score(doc=810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The American Mathematical Society (AMS) is developing a Web based information system that links e-journals tot he review database MathSciNet. In an interview, Donald Babbitt, AMS Publisher, describes the evolution, pricing, and future development of the AMS's e-journal projects

Language

e

0.022181291 = product of:
  0.055453226 = sum of:
    0.013976094 = weight(_text_:e in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013976094 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
    0.041477133 = product of:
      0.082954265 = sum of:
        0.082954265 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082954265 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

Source

Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22

0.022181291 = product of:
  0.055453226 = sum of:
    0.013976094 = weight(_text_:e in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013976094 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.2540935 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
    0.041477133 = product of:
      0.082954265 = sum of:
        0.082954265 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.082954265 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

Source

Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75

0.021439953 = product of:
  0.10719976 = sum of:
    0.10719976 = product of:
      0.32159927 = sum of:
        0.32159927 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32159927 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37314007 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

"Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."

0.020301977 = product of:
  0.101509884 = sum of:
    0.101509884 = weight(_text_:69 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101509884 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.48421675 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.

0.01940863 = product of:
  0.048521575 = sum of:
    0.012229082 = weight(_text_:e in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012229082 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
    0.036292493 = product of:
      0.07258499 = sum of:
        0.07258499 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07258499 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

Source

IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247

0.019400114 = product of:
  0.048500285 = sum of:
    0.0074119437 = weight(_text_:e in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074119437 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
    0.041088343 = product of:
      0.12326503 = sum of:
        0.12326503 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12326503 = score(doc=2337,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.6081582 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This study applied LDA (latent Dirichlet allocation) and regression analysis to conduct a lead-lag analysis to identify different topic evolution patterns between preprints and papers from arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS) in astrophysics over the last 20 years (1992-2011). Fifty topics in arXiv and WoS were generated using an LDA algorithm and then regression models were used to explain 4 types of topic growth patterns. Based on the slopes of the fitted equation curves, the paper redefines the topic trends and popularity. Results show that arXiv and WoS share similar topics in a given domain, but differ in evolution trends. Topics in WoS lose their popularity much earlier and their durations of popularity are shorter than those in arXiv. This work demonstrates that open access preprints have stronger growth tendency as compared to traditional printed publications.

Language

e

0.019308934 = product of:
  0.048272334 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 5950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=5950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 5950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5950)
    0.039537273 = product of:
      0.11861182 = sum of:
        0.11861182 = weight(_text_:evolution in 5950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11861182 = score(doc=5950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 5950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5950)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Describes the evolution of the SGML from its initial acceptance as an international standard for data description and data interchange, in Oct 86, to its technical completion and widespread acceptance

Language

e

0.019308934 = product of:
  0.048272334 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
    0.039537273 = product of:
      0.11861182 = sum of:
        0.11861182 = weight(_text_:evolution in 976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11861182 = score(doc=976,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 976, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=976)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

0.019308934 = product of:
  0.048272334 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=2441,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
    0.039537273 = product of:
      0.11861182 = sum of:
        0.11861182 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11861182 = score(doc=2441,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 2441, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2441)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Language

e

0.019308934 = product of:
  0.048272334 = sum of:
    0.00873506 = weight(_text_:e in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00873506 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03826694 = queryNorm
        0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
    0.039537273 = product of:
      0.11861182 = sum of:
        0.11861182 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11861182 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Contribution to an issue on the impact of technological change on libraries and ways in which librarians are applying technology to their collections, services to users and the management of their libraries. Traces the evolution of electronic publishing from the early 60s to the present. Pays particular attention to computer conferencing, and hypermedia.

Language

e