Search (228 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Vickery, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1971) 0.08
    0.07594856 = product of:
      0.18987139 = sum of:
        0.012229082 = weight(_text_:e in 4971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012229082 = score(doc=4971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 4971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4971)
        0.1776423 = weight(_text_:69 in 4971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1776423 = score(doc=4971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.8473793 = fieldWeight in 4971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4971)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 27(1971) no.2, S.69-82
  2. Szostak, R.: Facet analysis without facet indicators (2017) 0.07
    0.06509876 = product of:
      0.1627469 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
        0.15226483 = weight(_text_:69 in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15226483 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.72632515 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Pages
    S.69-86
  3. Vickery, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1997) 0.04
    0.043399174 = product of:
      0.10849793 = sum of:
        0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006988047 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
        0.101509884 = weight(_text_:69 in 572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101509884 = score(doc=572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.48421675 = fieldWeight in 572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=572)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck aus: Journal of documentation 27(1971) no.2, S.69-82
    Language
    e
  4. Bowker, G.C.; Star, S.L.: Sorting things out : classification and its consequences (1999) 0.03
    0.034425028 = product of:
      0.086062565 = sum of:
        0.0034940236 = weight(_text_:e in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034940236 = score(doc=733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
        0.08256854 = product of:
          0.16513708 = sum of:
            0.16513708 = weight(_text_:erkenntnistheorie in 733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16513708 = score(doc=733,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.26738477 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.987357 = idf(docFreq=110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.6176009 = fieldWeight in 733, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.987357 = idf(docFreq=110, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Classification
    CC 4400 Philosophie / Systematische Philosophie / Erkenntnistheorie / Abhandlungen zur Erkenntnistheorie
    Language
    e
    RVK
    CC 4400 Philosophie / Systematische Philosophie / Erkenntnistheorie / Abhandlungen zur Erkenntnistheorie
  5. Frické, M.: Reflections on classification : Thomas Reid and bibliographic description (2013) 0.03
    0.03254938 = product of:
      0.08137345 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 1766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=1766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1766)
        0.07613242 = weight(_text_:69 in 1766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07613242 = score(doc=1766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 1766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1766)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.4, S.507-522
  6. Smiraglia, R.P.; Heuvel, C. van den: Classifications and concepts : towards an elementary theory of knowledge interaction (2013) 0.03
    0.027124483 = product of:
      0.067811206 = sum of:
        0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00436753 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
        0.063443676 = weight(_text_:69 in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063443676 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.3, S.360-383
  7. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.02
    0.01663597 = product of:
      0.041589923 = sum of:
        0.010482071 = weight(_text_:e in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010482071 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
        0.03110785 = product of:
          0.0622157 = sum of:
            0.0622157 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0622157 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
    Language
    e
  8. Gnoli, C.: Progress in synthetic classification : towards unique definition of concepts (2007) 0.02
    0.0154431285 = product of:
      0.03860782 = sum of:
        0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00436753 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
        0.03424029 = product of:
          0.102720864 = sum of:
            0.102720864 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.102720864 = score(doc=2527,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.5067985 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The evolution of bibliographic classification schemes, from the end of the 19th century to our time, shows a trend of increasing possibilities to combine concepts in a classmark. While the early schemes, like DDC and LCC, were largely enumerative, more and more synthetic devices have appeared with common auxiliaries, facets, and phase relationships. The last editions of UDC and the UDC-derived FATKS project follow this evolution, by introducing more specific phase relationships and more common auxiliaries, like those for general properties and processes. This agrees with the Farradane's principle that each concept should have a place of unique definition, instead of being re-notated in each context where it occurs. This evolution appears to be unfinished, as even in most synthetic schemes many concepts have a different notation according to the disciplinary main classes where they occur. To overcome this limitation, main classes should be defined in terms of phenomena rather than disciplines: the Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is currently exploring this possibility. Examples with UDC, FATKS, and ILC notations are discussed.
    Language
    e
  9. Ereshefsky, M.: ¬The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy : a philosophical study of biological taxonomy (2007) 0.01
    0.014049539 = product of:
      0.035123847 = sum of:
        0.0034940236 = weight(_text_:e in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0034940236 = score(doc=2493,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
        0.031629823 = product of:
          0.09488946 = sum of:
            0.09488946 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09488946 = score(doc=2493,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Part I: The historical turn 1. The philosophy of classification 2. A primer of biological taxonomy 3. History and classification Part II: The multiplicity of nature 4. Species pluralism 5. How to be a discerning pluralist Part III: Hierarchies and nomenclature 6. The evolution of the Linnaean hierarchy 7. Post-Linnaean taxonomy 8. The future of biological nomenclature
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.255-259 (B. Hjoerland): "This book was published in 2000 simultaneously in hardback and as an electronic resource, and, in 2007, as a paperback. The author is a professor of philosophy at the University of Calgary, Canada. He has an impressive list of contributions, mostly addressing issues in biological taxonomy such as units of evolution, natural kinds and the species concept. The book is a scholarly criticism of the famous classification system developed by the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778). This system consists of both a set of rules for the naming of living organisms (biological nomenclature) and principles of classification. Linné's system has been used and adapted by biologists over a period of almost 250 years. Under the current system of codes, it is now applied to more than two million species of organisms. Inherent in the Linnaean system is the indication of hierarchic relationships. The Linnaean system has been justified primarily on the basis of stability. Although it has been criticized and alternatives have been suggested, it still has its advocates (e.g., Schuh, 2003). One of the alternatives being developed is The International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature, known as the PhyloCode for short, a system that radically alters the current nomenclatural rules. The new proposals have provoked hot debate on nomenclatural issues in biology. . . ."
    Language
    e
    RSWK
    Art / Evolution / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
    Subject
    Art / Evolution / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
  10. Denton, W.: Putting facets on the Web : an annotated bibliography (2003) 0.01
    0.013562242 = product of:
      0.033905603 = sum of:
        0.002183765 = weight(_text_:e in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002183765 = score(doc=2467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.03970211 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
        0.031721838 = weight(_text_:69 in 2467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031721838 = score(doc=2467,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20963728 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.15131773 = fieldWeight in 2467, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2467)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This bibliography is not meant to be exhaustive, but unfortunately it is not as complete as I wanted. Some books and articles are not be included, but they may be used in my future work. (These include two books and one article by B.C. Vickery: Faceted Classification Schemes (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, 1966), Classification and Indexing in Science, 3rd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1975), and "Knowledge Representation: A Brief Review" (Journal of Documentation 42 no. 3 (September 1986): 145-159; and A.C. Foskett's "The Future of Faceted Classification" in The Future of Classification, edited by Rita Marcella and Arthur Maltby (Aldershot, England: Gower, 2000): 69-80). Nevertheless, I hope this bibliography will be useful for those both new to or familiar with faceted hypertext systems. Some very basic resources are listed, as well as some very advanced ones. Some example web sites are mentioned, but there is no detailed technical discussion of any software. The user interface to any web site is extremely important, and this is briefly mentioned in two or three places (for example the discussion of lawforwa.org (see Example Web Sites)). The larger question of how to display information graphically and with hypertext is outside the scope of this bibliography. There are five sections: Recommended, Background, Not Relevant, Example Web Sites, and Mailing Lists. Background material is either introductory, advanced, or of peripheral interest, and can be read after the Recommended resources if the reader wants to know more. The Not Relevant category contains articles that may appear in bibliographies but are not relevant for my purposes.
    Language
    e
  11. Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003) 0.01
    0.011585359 = product of:
      0.028963398 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
        0.023722364 = product of:
          0.07116709 = sum of:
            0.07116709 = weight(_text_:evolution in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07116709 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
  12. Gnoli, C.: Phylogenetic classification (2006) 0.01
    0.011585359 = product of:
      0.028963398 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
        0.023722364 = product of:
          0.07116709 = sum of:
            0.07116709 = weight(_text_:evolution in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07116709 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    One general principle in the construction of classification schemes is that of grouping phenomena to be classified according to their shared origin in evolution or history (phylogenesis). In general schemes, this idea has been applied by several classificationists in identifying a series of integrative levels, each originated from the previous ones, and using them as the main classes. In special schemes, common origin is a key principle in many domains: examples are given from the classification of climates, of organisms, and of musical instruments. Experience from these domains, however, suggests that using common origin alone, as done in cladistic taxonomy, can produce weird results, like having birds as a subclass of reptiles; while the most satisfying classifications use a well balanced mix of common origin and similarity. It is discussed how this could be applied to the development of a general classification of phenomena in an emergentist perspective, and how the resulting classification tree could be structured. Charles Bennett's notion of logical depth appears to be a promising conceptual tool for this purpose.
    Language
    e
  13. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.011090646 = product of:
      0.027726613 = sum of:
        0.006988047 = weight(_text_:e in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006988047 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
        0.020738566 = product of:
          0.041477133 = sum of:
            0.041477133 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041477133 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
    Language
    e
  14. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.010717406 = product of:
      0.026793513 = sum of:
        0.008647268 = weight(_text_:e in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008647268 = score(doc=7241,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
        0.018146247 = product of:
          0.036292493 = sum of:
            0.036292493 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036292493 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
    Language
    e
  15. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.009704315 = product of:
      0.024260787 = sum of:
        0.006114541 = weight(_text_:e in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006114541 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
        0.018146247 = product of:
          0.036292493 = sum of:
            0.036292493 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036292493 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Language
    e
  16. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.009704315 = product of:
      0.024260787 = sum of:
        0.006114541 = weight(_text_:e in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006114541 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.018146247 = product of:
          0.036292493 = sum of:
            0.036292493 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036292493 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Pages
    S.22-36
  17. Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986) 0.01
    0.009654467 = product of:
      0.024136167 = sum of:
        0.00436753 = weight(_text_:e in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00436753 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
        0.019768637 = product of:
          0.05930591 = sum of:
            0.05930591 = weight(_text_:evolution in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05930591 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2026858 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper argues that the semantic axis of bibliographic classification systems can be found in the various warrants that have been used to justify the utility of classification systems. Classificationists, theorists, and critics have emphasized the syntactic aspects of classification theories and systems, but a number of semantic warrants can be identified. The evolution of four semantic warrants is traced through the development of twentieth-century classification theory: literary warrant, scientific/philosophical warrant, educational warrant, and cultural warrant. It is concluded that further examination of semantic warrants might make possible a rationalized approach to the creation of classification systems for particular uses. The attention of scholars on faceted schemes and classificatory structures had heretofore pulled our attention to the syntactic aspects (e.g., concept division and citation order), with semantics being considered more or less a question of the terms and their relationships and somewhat taken for granted, or at least construed as a unitary aspect. Attention is on the choice of the classes and their meaning, as well as their connection to the world, and not so much on their syntactic relationship. This notion is developed by providing an historical and conceptual overview of the various kinds of warrant discernible in working with bibliographic systems. In Beghtol's definition, warrant concerns more than just the selection of terms, but rather the mapping of a classification system to the context and uses.
    Language
    e
  18. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.008317985 = product of:
      0.020794962 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
        0.015553925 = product of:
          0.03110785 = sum of:
            0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03110785 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  19. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.008317985 = product of:
      0.020794962 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
        0.015553925 = product of:
          0.03110785 = sum of:
            0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03110785 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
    Language
    e
  20. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.008317985 = product of:
      0.020794962 = sum of:
        0.0052410355 = weight(_text_:e in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052410355 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055003747 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03826694 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.015553925 = product of:
          0.03110785 = sum of:
            0.03110785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03110785 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1340043 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03826694 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
    Language
    e

Authors

Languages

  • e 223
  • f 3
  • chi 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 198
  • m 23
  • el 10
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • More… Less…