-
Kajberg, L.: ¬A citation analysis of LIS serial literature published in Denmark 1957-1986 (1996)
0.07
0.07017441 = product of:
0.21052322 = sum of:
0.013559209 = weight(_text_:e in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013559209 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.19696401 = weight(_text_:69 in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19696401 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.8473793 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 52(1996) no.1, S.69-85
-
Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997)
0.05
0.053734962 = product of:
0.107469924 = sum of:
0.0058110896 = weight(_text_:e in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058110896 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.08441315 = weight(_text_:69 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08441315 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.017245688 = product of:
0.034491375 = sum of:
0.034491375 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034491375 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
- Language
- e
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.05
0.053734962 = product of:
0.107469924 = sum of:
0.0058110896 = weight(_text_:e in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058110896 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.08441315 = weight(_text_:69 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08441315 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.017245688 = product of:
0.034491375 = sum of:
0.034491375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034491375 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.8, S.959-973
-
Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019)
0.05
0.04633818 = product of:
0.13901453 = sum of:
0.11255086 = weight(_text_:69 in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255086 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.48421675 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
0.02646366 = weight(_text_:der in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02646366 = score(doc=5624,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0947768 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die Metamorphose des Wissenschaftsverlags Elsevier zum Research Intelligence Dienstleister ist paradigmatisch für die neuen Möglichkeiten der Protokollierung und Steuerung von Wissenschaft.
- Content
- Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.04
0.04477913 = product of:
0.08955826 = sum of:
0.0048425747 = weight(_text_:e in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048425747 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.070344284 = weight(_text_:69 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070344284 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.014371406 = product of:
0.028742813 = sum of:
0.028742813 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028742813 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.2, S.174-183
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.04
0.04477913 = product of:
0.08955826 = sum of:
0.0048425747 = weight(_text_:e in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048425747 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.070344284 = weight(_text_:69 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070344284 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.014371406 = product of:
0.028742813 = sum of:
0.028742813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028742813 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.674-687
-
Song, M.; Kang, K.; An, J.Y.: Investigating drug-disease interactions in drug-symptom-disease triples via citation relations (2018)
0.04
0.04477913 = product of:
0.08955826 = sum of:
0.0048425747 = weight(_text_:e in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048425747 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.070344284 = weight(_text_:69 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070344284 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.30263546 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.014371406 = product of:
0.028742813 = sum of:
0.028742813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028742813 = score(doc=4545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4545)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 1.11.2018 18:19:22
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.11, S.1355-1368
-
Garfield, E.: Random thoughts on citationology : Its theory and practice (1998)
0.04
0.041169453 = product of:
0.12350836 = sum of:
0.010957496 = weight(_text_:e in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010957496 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
0.11255086 = weight(_text_:69 in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255086 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.48421675 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Scientometrics. 43(1998) no.1, S.69-76
-
Haley, M.R.; McGee, M.K.: ¬A parametric "parent metric" approach for comparing maximum-normalized journal ranking metrics (2018)
0.04
0.041169453 = product of:
0.12350836 = sum of:
0.010957496 = weight(_text_:e in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010957496 = score(doc=3313,freq=4.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
0.11255086 = weight(_text_:69 in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11255086 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.48421675 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a parametric approach for facilitating inter-metric and inter-field comparisons of citation-based journal ranking metrics. The mechanism is simple to apply and adjusts for metric magnitude differentials and distributional asymmetries in the rank-score curves. The method is demonstrated using h-index, AWCR-index, g-index, and e-index data from journals in Accounting, Economics, and Finance.
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.172-176
-
Schlögl, C.; List, R,: Vergleiche von Zitaten, Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten : am Beispiel von zwei Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften (2018)
0.04
0.038598396 = product of:
0.11579519 = sum of:
0.08441315 = weight(_text_:69 in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08441315 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.03138204 = weight(_text_:der in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03138204 = score(doc=4236,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0947768 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Im vorliegenden Beitrag untersuchen wir die Beziehung zwischen Zitaten, Downloads und sog. Lesehäufigkeiten des sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystems "Mendeley" anhand der beiden Volkswirtschaftslehre-Zeitschriften "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management" und "Journal of Financial Economics". Trotz Ähnlichkeiten bei den Häufigkeitsverteilungen, konnten wir großteils nur mittlere (Rang)Korrelationen zwischen den drei Zeitschriftenindikatoren berechnen. In den drei Top-10 Rankings kam es zur Überschneidung von nur drei Publikationen. Deutliche Unterschiede gibt es bei den Alters- und Nutzerstrukturen. Während der Großteil der Mendeley-Nutzer Studierende sind, ist der Anteil der Professoren relativ gering. Durch die Mendeley-Profile kann ermittelt werden, aus welchen Disziplinen die Leser einer Zeitschrift kommen. Dies lässt vor allem bei interdisziplinären Zeitschriften wie "Journal of Financial Economics" interessante Rückschlüsse zu. Ähnlich wie bei Zitaten, gibt es auch bei Downloads und Lesehäufigkeiten disziplinspezifische Unterschiede.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 69(2018) H.1, S.121-128
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.04
0.03686221 = product of:
0.07372442 = sum of:
0.009685149 = weight(_text_:e in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009685149 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.15880844 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.02339079 = weight(_text_:der in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02339079 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0947768 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.040648475 = product of:
0.08129695 = sum of:
0.08129695 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08129695 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
- Language
- e
-
Tüür-Fröhlich, T.: ¬Eine "autoritative" Datenbank auf dem Prüfstand : der Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) und seine Datenqualität (2018)
0.04
0.036240526 = product of:
0.10872158 = sum of:
0.08441315 = weight(_text_:69 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08441315 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.024308426 = weight(_text_:der in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024308426 = score(doc=4591,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0947768 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Zitatdatenbanken bilden die Datengrundlagen für zahlreiche szientometrische Untersuchungen, Evaluationen wissenschaftlicher Leistungen und Uni-Rankings. In der Literatur finden sich kaum Hinweise auf endogene Fehler (Original richtig, Datenbankeintrag falsch) in den kostenpflichtigen Datenbanken. Banale Fehler (z. B. Falschschreibung der Namen von Autorinnen oder Autoren) in Datenbanken hätten nur geringe Relevanz. Die Fehlersuche zu Pierre Bourdieu als "cited author" im SSCI (Vergleich Original - SSCI-Record) ergab mehr als 85 Mutationen. Die Fallstudien zeigen eine hohe Anzahl endogener Datenbankfehler. In den Rechtswissenschaften übliche Referenzen in Fußnoten laufen große Gefahr, in Phantomreferenzen verwandelt zu werden (Fallstudie Harvard Law Review: 99 Prozent Fehler). Dem Anspruch des SSCI, die "relevanten" globalen Sozialwissenschaften abzubilden - für alle im SSCI erfassten Disziplinen -, stehen offenbar Mängel in Datenerfassung und -verarbeitung im Wege.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 69(2018) H.5/6, S.265-275
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.04
0.035823308 = product of:
0.071646616 = sum of:
0.0038740598 = weight(_text_:e in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038740598 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.063523374 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.05627543 = weight(_text_:69 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05627543 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.24210837 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.011497125 = product of:
0.02299425 = sum of:
0.02299425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02299425 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14857961 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.557-575
-
MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: ¬The mismeasure of science : citation analysis (2018)
0.04
0.035087205 = product of:
0.10526161 = sum of:
0.0067796046 = weight(_text_:e in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067796046 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
0.098482005 = weight(_text_:69 in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098482005 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.42368966 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.3, S.474-482
-
Fassin, Y.: ¬A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame index for academics (2018)
0.04
0.035087205 = product of:
0.10526161 = sum of:
0.0067796046 = weight(_text_:e in 4571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067796046 = score(doc=4571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4571)
0.098482005 = weight(_text_:69 in 4571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098482005 = score(doc=4571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.42368966 = fieldWeight in 4571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4571)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.11, S.1396-1399
-
Didegah, F.; Bowman, T.D.; Holmberg, K.: On the differences between citations and altmetrics : an investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for finnish articles (2018)
0.03
0.034774806 = product of:
0.104324415 = sum of:
0.0048425747 = weight(_text_:e in 4258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048425747 = score(doc=4258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4258)
0.09948184 = weight(_text_:69 in 4258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948184 = score(doc=4258,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.42799118 = fieldWeight in 4258, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4258)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/23301643/69/6.
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.6, S.832-843
-
Zhang, P.; Wang, OP.; Wu, Q.: How are the best JASIST papers cited? (2018)
0.03
0.034774806 = product of:
0.104324415 = sum of:
0.0048425747 = weight(_text_:e in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048425747 = score(doc=4259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
0.09948184 = weight(_text_:69 in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948184 = score(doc=4259,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.42799118 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/23301643/69/6.
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.6, S.857-860
-
White, H.D.; Zuccala, A.A.: Libcitations, worldcat, cultural impact, and fame (2018)
0.03
0.034774806 = product of:
0.104324415 = sum of:
0.0048425747 = weight(_text_:e in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048425747 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
0.09948184 = weight(_text_:69 in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948184 = score(doc=4578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.42799118 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/23301643/2018/69/12.
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.12, S.1502-1512
-
Ohly, K.P.: Bibliometrie in der Postmoderne (2006)
0.03
0.03406088 = product of:
0.10218264 = sum of:
0.046547085 = weight(_text_:der in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046547085 = score(doc=5865,freq=22.0), product of:
0.0947768 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.4911232 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.055635557 = product of:
0.11127111 = sum of:
0.11127111 = weight(_text_:wissenschaften in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11127111 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2668672 = queryWeight, product of:
6.2897153 = idf(docFreq=222, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.41695315 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.2897153 = idf(docFreq=222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die Messung wissenschaftlicher Leistung hat gerade in Zeiten knapper öffentlicher Budgets Konjunktur. Wissenschaftliche Indikatoren zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass nicht mehr einzelne Experten ihre subjektive Einschätzung über den Zustand der Wissenschaften abgeben, sondern die Summe dessen, was die Wissenschaft selbst produziert hat, so analysiert wird, dass ein objektives' Bild der Wissenschaft entsteht'. Zudem könnte mit der öffentlichen Diskussion etwa von Rankinglisten eine demokratische Steuerung des Wissenschaftsbetriebs erreicht zu werden'. Andererseits kann seriöse Forschung, die langfristige Forschungsziele in unspektakulären Schritten stützt, die unkonventionell Wissenschaft betreibt oder die Methodenkritik ernst nimmt, hierdurch benachteiligt werden. In unserer wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation wird es zunehmend schwerer, Wissenschaftsinhalte, Wissenschaftseinheiten und Wissenschaftsauswirkungen zu definieren oder gar ursächlich zuzuschreiben. Eine Bibliometrie, die sich als eine Wissenschaft von der Messbarkeit und Aussagekraft der wissenschaftlichen Prozesse und Produkte versteht, wird genau dort wieder anzusetzen haben, wo sie einst begonnen hat: nämlich bei der Hinterfragung dessen, wie Wissenschaftlichkeit und Forschungsfortschritt sich objektiv ausdrückt und wie dies 'unobstrusiv' ermittelt und sozialverträglich kommuniziert werden kann.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.9
- Source
- Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
-
Zhao, M.; Yan, E.; Li, K.: Data set mentions and citations : a content analysis of full-text publications (2018)
0.03
0.030877091 = product of:
0.09263127 = sum of:
0.008218123 = weight(_text_:e in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008218123 = score(doc=4008,freq=4.0), product of:
0.060986366 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
0.08441315 = weight(_text_:69 in 4008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08441315 = score(doc=4008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23243901 = queryWeight, product of:
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.042429138 = queryNorm
0.36316258 = fieldWeight in 4008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.478287 = idf(docFreq=501, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4008)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Language
- e
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.32-46
