-
Deerwester, S.C.; Dumais, S.T.; Landauer, T.K.; Furnas, G.W.; Harshman, R.A.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis (1990)
0.06
0.06473029 = product of:
0.16182572 = sum of:
0.007783594 = weight(_text_:a in 2399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007783594 = score(doc=2399,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2399, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2399)
0.15404212 = weight(_text_:391 in 2399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15404212 = score(doc=2399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32032555 = queryWeight, product of:
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.48089242 = fieldWeight in 2399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.2542357 = idf(docFreq=84, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2399)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A new method for automatic indexing and retrieval is described. The approach is to take advantage of implicit higher-order structure in the association of terms with documents ("semantic structure") in order to improve the detection of relevant documents on the basis of terms found in queries. The particular technique used is singular-value decomposition, in which a large term by document matrix is decomposed into a set of ca 100 orthogonal factors from which the original matrix can be approximated by linear combination. Documents are represented by ca 100 item vectors of factor weights. Queries are represented as pseudo-document vectors formed from weighted combinations of terms, and documents with supra-threshold cosine values are returned. Initial tests find this completely automatic method for retrieval to be promising.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.391-407
- Type
- a
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.023295792 = product of:
0.05823948 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.047861353 = product of:
0.095722705 = sum of:
0.095722705 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095722705 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
- Type
- a
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.02
0.021888383 = product of:
0.054720957 = sum of:
0.012842276 = weight(_text_:a in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012842276 = score(doc=2134,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.04187868 = product of:
0.08375736 = sum of:
0.08375736 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08375736 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Type
- a
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.02
0.020383818 = product of:
0.050959542 = sum of:
0.00908086 = weight(_text_:a in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00908086 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.04187868 = product of:
0.08375736 = sum of:
0.08375736 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08375736 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
- Type
- a
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.017471844 = product of:
0.04367961 = sum of:
0.007783594 = weight(_text_:a in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007783594 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.035896014 = product of:
0.07179203 = sum of:
0.07179203 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07179203 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
- Type
- a
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.017471844 = product of:
0.04367961 = sum of:
0.007783594 = weight(_text_:a in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007783594 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.035896014 = product of:
0.07179203 = sum of:
0.07179203 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07179203 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
- Type
- a
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.01
0.01421351 = product of:
0.035533775 = sum of:
0.011603097 = weight(_text_:a in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011603097 = score(doc=1422,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We propose a novel approach to incorporate term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval. The ability of the logic to handle expressive representations along with the use of such classical notions are promising characteristics for IR systems. The approach proposed here has been efficiently implemented and experiments against test collections are presented.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Type
- a
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.01
0.0137235215 = product of:
0.034308802 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=3499,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a survey and discussion on signature-based text retrieval methods. It describes the main idea behind the signature approach and its advantages over other text retrieval methods, it provides a classification of the signature methods that have appeared in the literature, it describes the main representatives of each class, together with the relative advantages and drawbacks, and it gives a list of applications as well as commercial or university prototypes that use the signature approach
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
- Type
- a
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.0137235215 = product of:
0.034308802 = sum of:
0.010378125 = weight(_text_:a in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010378125 = score(doc=1431,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Properties of a percentile-based rating scale needed in bibliometrics are formulated. Based on these properties, P100 was recently introduced as a new citation-rank approach (Bornmann, Leydesdorff, & Wang, 2013). In this paper, we conceptualize P100 and propose an improvement which we call P100'. Advantages and disadvantages of citation-rank indicators are noted.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Type
- a
-
MacFarlane, A.; Robertson, S.E.; McCann, J.A.: Parallel computing for passage retrieval (2004)
0.01
0.012507647 = product of:
0.03126912 = sum of:
0.007338443 = weight(_text_:a in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007338443 = score(doc=5108,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.023930676 = product of:
0.047861353 = sum of:
0.047861353 = weight(_text_:22 in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047861353 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 18:30:22
- Type
- a
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.011521439 = product of:
0.028803596 = sum of:
0.007864255 = weight(_text_:a in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007864255 = score(doc=1319,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.02093934 = product of:
0.04187868 = sum of:
0.04187868 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04187868 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
- Type
- a
-
Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015)
0.01
0.011361546 = product of:
0.028403863 = sum of:
0.007251936 = weight(_text_:a in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007251936 = score(doc=2591,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.021151928 = product of:
0.042303856 = sum of:
0.042303856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042303856 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose In a system-based approach, replicating the web would require large test collections, and judging the relevancy of all documents per topic in creating relevance judgment through human assessors is infeasible. Due to the large amount of documents that requires judgment, there are possible errors introduced by human assessors because of disagreements. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach This study explores exponential variation and document ranking methods that generate a reliable set of relevance judgments (pseudo relevance judgments) to reduce human efforts. These methods overcome problems with large amounts of documents for judgment while avoiding human disagreement errors during the judgment process. This study utilizes two key factors: number of occurrences of each document per topic from all the system runs; and document rankings to generate the alternate methods. Findings The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated using the correlation coefficient of ranked systems using mean average precision scores between the original Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) relevance judgments and pseudo relevance judgments. The results suggest that the proposed document ranking method with a pool depth of 100 could be a reliable alternative to reduce human effort and disagreement errors involved in generating TREC-like relevance judgments. Originality/value Simple methods proposed in this study show improvement in the correlation coefficient in generating alternate relevance judgment without human assessors while contributing to information retrieval evaluation.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 18:22:56
- Type
- a
-
Witschel, H.F.: Global term weights in distributed environments (2008)
0.01
0.011297894 = product of:
0.028244734 = sum of:
0.0102967275 = weight(_text_:a in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0102967275 = score(doc=2096,freq=14.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.017948007 = product of:
0.035896014 = sum of:
0.035896014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035896014 = score(doc=2096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2096)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper examines the estimation of global term weights (such as IDF) in information retrieval scenarios where a global view on the collection is not available. In particular, the two options of either sampling documents or of using a reference corpus independent of the target retrieval collection are compared using standard IR test collections. In addition, the possibility of pruning term lists based on frequency is evaluated. The results show that very good retrieval performance can be reached when just the most frequent terms of a collection - an "extended stop word list" - are known and all terms which are not in that list are treated equally. However, the list cannot always be fully estimated from a general-purpose reference corpus, but some "domain-specific stop words" need to be added. A good solution for achieving this is to mix estimates from small samples of the target retrieval collection with ones derived from a reference corpus.
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 9:44:22
- Type
- a
-
Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996)
0.01
0.010660133 = product of:
0.026650332 = sum of:
0.008702324 = weight(_text_:a in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008702324 = score(doc=6973,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.017948007 = product of:
0.035896014 = sum of:
0.035896014 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035896014 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Proposes that signature files be used as a viable alternative to other indexing strategies such as inverted files for searching through large volumes of text. Demonstrates through simulation, that search times can be further reduced by enhancing the basic signature file concept using deterministic partitioning algorithms which eliminate the need for an exhaustive search of the entire signature file. Reports research to evaluate the performance of some deterministic partitioning algorithms in a non simulated environment using 276 MB of raw newspaper text (taken from the Wall Street Journal) and real user queries. Presents a selection of results to illustrate trends and highlight important aspects of the performance of these methods under realistic rather than simulated operating conditions. As a result of the research reported here certain aspects of this approach to signature files are shown to be found wanting and require improvement. Suggests lines of future research on the partitioning of signature files
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
- Type
- a
-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.01
0.010660133 = product of:
0.026650332 = sum of:
0.008702324 = weight(_text_:a in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008702324 = score(doc=2419,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.017948007 = product of:
0.035896014 = sum of:
0.035896014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035896014 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
- Type
- a
-
Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003)
0.01
0.010660133 = product of:
0.026650332 = sum of:
0.008702324 = weight(_text_:a in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008702324 = score(doc=825,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.017948007 = product of:
0.035896014 = sum of:
0.035896014 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035896014 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Relevance Feedback consists in automatically formulating a new query according to the relevance judgments provided by the user after evaluating a set of retrieved documents. In this article, we introduce several relevance feedback methods for the Bayesian Network Retrieval ModeL The theoretical frame an which our methods are based uses the concept of partial evidences, which summarize the new pieces of information gathered after evaluating the results obtained by the original query. These partial evidences are inserted into the underlying Bayesian network and a new inference process (probabilities propagation) is run to compute the posterior relevance probabilities of the documents in the collection given the new query. The quality of the proposed methods is tested using a preliminary experimentation with different standard document collections.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:30:19
- Type
- a
-
Fan, W.; Fox, E.A.; Pathak, P.; Wu, H.: ¬The effects of fitness functions an genetic programming-based ranking discovery for Web search (2004)
0.01
0.010292641 = product of:
0.0257316 = sum of:
0.007783594 = weight(_text_:a in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007783594 = score(doc=2239,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.017948007 = product of:
0.035896014 = sum of:
0.035896014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035896014 = score(doc=2239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Genetic-based evolutionary learning algorithms, such as genetic algorithms (GAs) and genetic programming (GP), have been applied to information retrieval (IR) since the 1980s. Recently, GP has been applied to a new IR taskdiscovery of ranking functions for Web search-and has achieved very promising results. However, in our prior research, only one fitness function has been used for GP-based learning. It is unclear how other fitness functions may affect ranking function discovery for Web search, especially since it is weIl known that choosing a proper fitness function is very important for the effectiveness and efficiency of evolutionary algorithms. In this article, we report our experience in contrasting different fitness function designs an GP-based learning using a very large Web corpus. Our results indicate that the design of fitness functions is instrumental in performance improvement. We also give recommendations an the design of fitness functions for genetic-based information retrieval experiments.
- Date
- 31. 5.2004 19:22:06
- Type
- a
-
Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003)
0.01
0.010292641 = product of:
0.0257316 = sum of:
0.007783594 = weight(_text_:a in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007783594 = score(doc=2717,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.017948007 = product of:
0.035896014 = sum of:
0.035896014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035896014 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Previous work an search-engine design has indicated that information-seekers may benefit from being given the opportunity to exploit multiple sources of evidence of document relatedness. Few existing systems, however, give users more than minimal control over the selections that may be made among methods of exploitation. By applying the methods of "document network analysis" (DNA), a unifying, graph-theoretic model of content-, collaboration-, and context-based systems (CCC) may be developed in which the nature of the similarities between types of document relatedness and document ranking are clarified. The usefulness of the approach to system design suggested by this model may be tested by constructing and evaluating a prototype system (UCXtra) that allows searchers to maintain control over the multiple ways in which document collections may be ranked and re-ranked.
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 17:32:22
- Type
- a
-
Song, D.; Bruza, P.D.: Towards context sensitive information inference (2003)
0.01
0.010285213 = product of:
0.025713032 = sum of:
0.010756359 = weight(_text_:a in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010756359 = score(doc=1428,freq=22.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.014956673 = product of:
0.029913345 = sum of:
0.029913345 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029913345 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Humans can make hasty, but generally robust judgements about what a text fragment is, or is not, about. Such judgements are termed information inference. This article furnishes an account of information inference from a psychologistic stance. By drawing an theories from nonclassical logic and applied cognition, an information inference mechanism is proposed that makes inferences via computations of information flow through an approximation of a conceptual space. Within a conceptual space information is represented geometrically. In this article, geometric representations of words are realized as vectors in a high dimensional semantic space, which is automatically constructed from a text corpus. Two approaches were presented for priming vector representations according to context. The first approach uses a concept combination heuristic to adjust the vector representation of a concept in the light of the representation of another concept. The second approach computes a prototypical concept an the basis of exemplar trace texts and moves it in the dimensional space according to the context. Information inference is evaluated by measuring the effectiveness of query models derived by information flow computations. Results show that information flow contributes significantly to query model effectiveness, particularly with respect to precision. Moreover, retrieval effectiveness compares favorably with two probabilistic query models, and another based an semantic association. More generally, this article can be seen as a contribution towards realizing operational systems that mimic text-based human reasoning.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:35:46
- Type
- a
-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.01
0.010191909 = product of:
0.025479771 = sum of:
0.00454043 = weight(_text_:a in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00454043 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050915137 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.02093934 = product of:
0.04187868 = sum of:
0.04187868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04187868 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15463042 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044157036 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
- Type
- a
