Search (71 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979) 0.06 
    0.055714935 = product of:
  0.13928734 = sum of:
    0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073142797 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
    0.13197306 = weight(_text_:63 in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13197306 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.64936686 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.54-63
    Type
    a
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Wissensorganisation und Wissensrepräsentation (1986) 0.04 
    0.03714329 = product of:
  0.092858225 = sum of:
    0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 8543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004876186 = score(doc=8543,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8543, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8543)
    0.087982036 = weight(_text_:63 in 8543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087982036 = score(doc=8543,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.43291122 = fieldWeight in 8543, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8543)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Bibliothekswesen und Dokumentation des Landbaues. 1986, H.40, S.55-63
    Type
    a
  3. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (1975) 0.03 
    0.03078318 = product of:
  0.07695795 = sum of:
    0.0109714195 = weight(_text_:a in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0109714195 = score(doc=2103,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields
    Footnote
    Vgl.den digitalisierten Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.1, S.56-63.
    Type
    a
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.03 
    0.027363956 = product of:
  0.06840989 = sum of:
    0.012190466 = weight(_text_:a in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012190466 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
    0.05621942 = product of:
      0.11243884 = sum of:
        0.11243884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11243884 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
    Type
    a
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.03 
    0.027363956 = product of:
  0.06840989 = sum of:
    0.012190466 = weight(_text_:a in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012190466 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
    0.05621942 = product of:
      0.11243884 = sum of:
        0.11243884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11243884 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
    Type
    a
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03 
    0.027363956 = product of:
  0.06840989 = sum of:
    0.012190466 = weight(_text_:a in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012190466 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
    0.05621942 = product of:
      0.11243884 = sum of:
        0.11243884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11243884 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
    Type
    a
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The terminology of subject-fields (2015) 0.03 
    0.025652647 = product of:
  0.06413162 = sum of:
    0.00914285 = weight(_text_:a in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00914285 = score(doc=2104,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    So far terminological work has been mainly directed towards defining very special concepts. The more general ones, e.g. those denoting subject-fields have been neglected with the result that communication on this level has been seriously hampered. There exists a great number of such terms and also a growing trend for the formation of new ones. In the FRG an R&D project was started in 1972 with the collection of names of subject fields, it is intended to assemble their definitions in a dictionary and to build a general concept system by computercomparison of their characteristics as provided by their definitions. The nature of subject-fields is explained, details on the German collection are given as well as some results from a formal analysis of their concepts. It is proposed to initiate similar projects in other linguistic regions as well; this could be done under the auspices of Infoterm. Some application-possibilities for a general concept-system (e. g. a broad system of ordering) are given. The annex displays a scheme of 9 subject areas and about 90 subareas for the sorting of names of subject fields.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.1, S.56-63
    Type
    a
  8. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02 
    0.019154768 = product of:
  0.04788692 = sum of:
    0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008533326 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
    0.039353594 = product of:
      0.07870719 = sum of:
        0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07870719 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.9-22
    Type
    a
  9. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The future of classification in libraries and networks : a theoretical point of view (1995) 0.02 
    0.01585233 = product of:
  0.039630823 = sum of:
    0.008619961 = weight(_text_:a in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008619961 = score(doc=5563,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
    0.031010862 = product of:
      0.062021725 = sum of:
        0.062021725 = weight(_text_:dewey in 5563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062021725 = score(doc=5563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2873517 = fieldWeight in 5563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Some time ago, some people said classification is dead, we don't need it any more. They probably thought that subject headings could do the job of the necessary subject analysis and shelving of books. However, all of a sudden in 1984 the attitude changed, when an OCLC study of Karen Markey started to show what could be done even with an "outdated system" such as the Dewey Decimal Classification in the computer, once it was visible on a screen to show the helpfulness of a classified library catalogue called an OPAC; classification was brought back into the minds of doubtful librarians and of all those who thought they would not need it any longer. But the problem once phrased: "We are stuck with the two old systems, LCC and DDC" would not find a solution and is still with us today. We know that our systems are outdated but we seem still to be unable to replace them with better ones. What then should one do and advise, knowing that we need something better? Perhaps a new universal ordering system which more adequately represents and mediates the world of our present day knowledge? If we were to develop it from scratch, how would we create it and implement it in such a way that it would be acceptable to the majority of the present intellectual world population?
    Type
    a
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.01 
    0.013681978 = product of:
  0.034204945 = sum of:
    0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006095233 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
    0.02810971 = product of:
      0.05621942 = sum of:
        0.05621942 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05621942 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01 
    0.010945583 = product of:
  0.027363956 = sum of:
    0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004876186 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
    0.022487769 = product of:
      0.044975538 = sum of:
        0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044975538 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  12. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01 
    0.01038872 = product of:
  0.025971798 = sum of:
    0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006095233 = score(doc=1493,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
    0.019876566 = product of:
      0.03975313 = sum of:
        0.03975313 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03975313 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A lot of information that is already available on the Web, or retrieved from local information systems and social networks is structured in data silos that are not semantically related. Semantic technologies make it emerge that the use of typed links that directly express their relations are an advantage for every application that can reuse the incorporated knowledge about the data. For this reason, data integration, through reengineering (e.g. triplify), or querying (e.g. D2R) is an important task in order to make information available for everyone. Thus, in order to build a semantic map of the data, we need knowledge about data items itself and the relation between heterogeneous data items. In this paper, we present our work of providing Lexical Linked Data (LLD) through a meta-model that contains all the resources and gives the possibility to retrieve and navigate them from different perspectives. We combine the existing work done on knowledge domains (based on the Information Coding Classification) within the Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud (based on the RDF/OWL EurowordNet and the related integrated lexical resources (MultiWordNet, EuroWordNet, MEMODATA Lexicon, Hamburg Methaphor DB).
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  13. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.01 
    0.008209187 = product of:
  0.020522965 = sum of:
    0.0036571398 = weight(_text_:a in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036571398 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
    0.016865825 = product of:
      0.03373165 = sum of:
        0.03373165 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03373165 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13
    Type
    a
  14. Dahlberg, I.: Principles for the construction of a universal classification system : a proposal (1978) 0.00 
    0.0029560311 = product of:
  0.014780155 = sum of:
    0.014780155 = weight(_text_:a in 67) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014780155 = score(doc=67,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 67, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=67)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Einteilungsprinzipien von Klassifikationssystemen (1974) 0.00 
    0.0024380933 = product of:
  0.012190466 = sum of:
    0.012190466 = weight(_text_:a in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012190466 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a
  16. Dahlberg, I.: Ingetraut Dahlberg : a brief self report (1998) 0.00 
    0.0024380933 = product of:
  0.012190466 = sum of:
    0.012190466 = weight(_text_:a in 2510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012190466 = score(doc=2510,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 2510, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2510)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Ingetraut Dahlberg presents a brief description of her career and involvement with cataloguing and classification schemes
    Footnote
    Articles included in an issue devoted to part 1 of a 2 part series celebrating people who have been leaders in the field of cataloguing and classification
    Type
    a
  17. Dahlberg, I.: Toward establishment of compatibility between indexing languages (1981) 0.00 
    0.0023888338 = product of:
  0.011944169 = sum of:
    0.011944169 = weight(_text_:a in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011944169 = score(doc=5218,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Outlines previous work done in the field of compatibility between indexing langugaes (IL), and describes the scope, limitations and advantages of establishing compatibility between IL. Suggests methods for verbal comparisons between IL as well as generation of an alphabetical comparison matrix M1. Conceptual comparisons, however, demand a conceptual reorganization of M1 into a compatibiliy matrix M2 with its two alternatices, namely a system-related matrix M3 and a hierarchical matrix M4. In conclusion, the use of a compatibility matrix and organizational problems are described
    Type
    a
  18. Dahlberg, I.: Knowledge organization : a new science? (2006) 0.00 
    0.0020902294 = product of:
  0.010451147 = sum of:
    0.010451147 = weight(_text_:a in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010451147 = score(doc=3375,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In ISKO's name, the term "Knowledge Organization" (KO) denotes already the object and the activity area significant for the existence of any science. Both areas are outlined and their specific contents shown. Also a survey of its special subfields is given. The sciencetheoretical foundation of Knowledge Organization as a new scientific discipline is based on the propositional concept of science. Within a universal system of the sciences, KO has been regarded as a subfield of Science of Science. Concludingly it is proposed to find the necessary institution for work in concerted effort of scientists, knowledge organizers and terminologists on the collection, definition, and systematization of concepts of all subject fields, utilizing the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as the necessary categorizing structure.
    Type
    a
  19. Dahlberg, I.: Library catalogs in the Internet : switching for future subject access (1996) 0.00 
    0.0020687906 = product of:
  0.010343953 = sum of:
    0.010343953 = weight(_text_:a in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010343953 = score(doc=5171,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A multitude of library catalogs are now being entered into the Internet. Their differing classification and subject headings systems used for subject access call for a switching system, a black box to facilitate the location of subject fields and their subjects in these systems. The principles on which such a switching system must be built in order to provide the necessary insight, surveyability, reproducebility and ease of concept combinability (e.g. in cases of interdisciplinary subjects) are outlined and compared with the BSO which hance once been established by the FID in order to serve a switching purpose. The advantages of using the Information Coding Classification (ICC) as a switching system in the Internet are demonstrated, likewise the methodology needed to establish the necessary correlation between library classification systems (and if possible also subject heading systems and thesauri) and the ICC. Finally some organizational implications for creating a switching for 6 universal systems in use are described
    Type
    a
  20. Dahlberg, I.: ¬The compatibility guidelines : a re-evaluation (1996) 0.00 
    0.0020687906 = product of:
  0.010343953 = sum of:
    0.010343953 = weight(_text_:a in 6047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010343953 = score(doc=6047,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6047, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6047)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 37
  • e 33
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 69
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes