Search (588 results, page 1 of 30)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Carlyle, A.: Matching LSCH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.06 
    0.056926806 = product of:
  0.14231701 = sum of:
    0.010343953 = weight(_text_:a in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010343953 = score(doc=347,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
    0.13197306 = weight(_text_:63 in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13197306 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.64936686 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.37-63
    Type
    a
  2. Lundgren, J.; Simpson, B.: Cataloging needs survey for faculty at the University of Florida (1997) 0.03 
    0.0332073 = product of:
  0.08301825 = sum of:
    0.0060339733 = weight(_text_:a in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060339733 = score(doc=508,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
    0.07698428 = weight(_text_:63 in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07698428 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.37879732 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey of lecturers and students, at Florida University at Gainesville, to determine the degree to which the information provided in catalogue records serve the needs of library users and the usefulness of including and displaying typical elements of catalogue records. Results indicate the highest level of agreement with usefulness of: title; primary author; date; subjects; other authors; and series. There were moderately high levels of agreement for: summary notes; contents notes; standard numbers; publisher; pagination; and related titles; and lower levels of agreement for reference notes; place of publication; index notes; illustrations; and size
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1997) nos.3/4, S.47-63
    Type
    a
  3. Stallmann, A.: Silver Surfer im Internet (2012) 0.03 
    0.0332073 = product of:
  0.08301825 = sum of:
    0.0060339733 = weight(_text_:a in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060339733 = score(doc=408,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
    0.07698428 = weight(_text_:63 in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07698428 = score(doc=408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.37879732 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.4, S.217-226
    Type
    a
  4. Atlas, M.C.; Little, K.R.; Purcell, M.O.: Flip charts at the OPAC : using transaction log analysis to judge their effectiveness (1997) 0.03 
    0.029977862 = product of:
  0.07494465 = sum of:
    0.008958126 = weight(_text_:a in 1445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008958126 = score(doc=1445,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1445, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1445)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 1445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=1445,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 1445, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1445)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes a project, conducted with a development grant from the Kentucky Library Association's Academic Section, to design and produce a number of flip charts for use at OPAC terminals in 6 of the Louisville university libraries. The custom made flip charts were designed as point of use user training tools. Reports results of an analysis of OPAC transaction logs to measure the success of the flip charts. Comparisons were made among the types of searches conducted, the percentages of zero hits, and the types of errors found before and after the introduction of the flip charts to determine whether searching succes rates had improved or if searching strategies had changed. Results indicated that the presence of the flip charts had not brought about a significant change in searching success. Concludes that there is no substitute for professional librarians working in a one to one relationship with the OPAC user
    Source
    Reference and user services quarterly. 37(1997) no.1, S.63-69
    Type
    a
  5. Foss, E.; Druin, A.; Brewer, R.; Lo, P.; Sanchez, L.; Golub, E.; Hutchinson, H.: Children's search roles at home : implications for designers, researchers, educators, and parents (2012) 0.03 
    0.029320324 = product of:
  0.07330081 = sum of:
    0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073142797 = score(doc=74,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=74,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a large-scale, qualitative study conducted in the homes of children aged 7, 9, and 11 investigating internet searching processes on Google. Seven search roles, representing distinct behavior patterns displayed by children when interacting with the Google search engine, are described, including Developing Searchers, Domain-specific Searchers, Power Searchers, Nonmotivated Searchers, Distracted Searchers, Rule-bound Searchers, and Visual Searchers. Other trends are described and selected to present a view of the whole child searcher. These roles and trends are used to make recommendations to designers, researchers, educators, and parents about the directions to take when considering how to best aid children to become search literate.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.558-573
    Type
    a
  6. Niu, X.; Hemminger, B.M.: ¬A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists (2012) 0.03 
    0.028928353 = product of:
  0.07232088 = sum of:
    0.0063343523 = weight(_text_:a in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063343523 = score(doc=4986,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=4986,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In an effort to understand how academic scientists seek information relevant to their research in today's environment of ubiquitous electronic access, a correlation framework is built and regression analysis is applied to the survey results from 2,063 academic researchers in natural science, engineering, and medical science at five research universities in the United States. Previous work has reported descriptive statistics about these scientists' information-seeking behavior. This study extends that work to examine relationships between scientists' information-seeking behaviors and their personal and environmental factors. Several regression models, including the Poisson model, the logit model, and the ordered logit model, are built to interpret the correlation among scientists' behaviors. In addition, exploratory factor analysis is used for data reduction. Overall, many factors were found to affect the specific information-seeking behaviors of scientists, including demographic, psychological, role-related, and environmental factors. Of the factors having an effect, academic position was the most important determinant of information behavior.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.336-353
    Type
    a
  7. Beverley, C.A.; Bath, P.A.; Barber, R.: Can two established information models explain the information behaviour of visually impaired people seeking health and social care information? (2007) 0.02 
    0.024981549 = product of:
  0.062453873 = sum of:
    0.0074651055 = weight(_text_:a in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074651055 = score(doc=738,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which two existing models of information behaviour could explain the information behaviour of visually impaired people seeking health and social care information. Design/methodology/approach - The research was conducted within a constructivist paradigm. A total of 28 semi-structured interviews (face-to-face or telephone) with 31 visually impaired people were conducted. Framework analysis was used to analyse the results. Findings - This study identified several factors that may affect a visually impaired person's information behaviour. These related to the presence of other health conditions or disabilities, participants' understanding of the word "information", their interactions with information providers, their degree of independence, the support they received from friends and family, their acceptance of their own visual impairment, as well as their awareness of other visual impairments, their registration status and their willingness and ability to pay for aids, adaptations and equipment. Originality/ value - This study provides a new and valuable insight into the information behaviour of visually impaired people, as well as testing the applicability of a specific and generic information model to the information behaviour of visually impaired people seeking health and social care information.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 63(2007) no.1, S.9-32
    Type
    a
  8. Kules, B.; Capra, R.: Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface (2012) 0.02 
    0.024721378 = product of:
  0.061803445 = sum of:
    0.006814678 = weight(_text_:a in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006814678 = score(doc=4129,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=4129,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This study examined how searchers interact with a web-based, faceted library catalog when conducting exploratory searches. It applied multiple methods, including eye tracking and stimulated recall interviews, to investigate important aspects of faceted search interface use, specifically: (a) searcher gaze behavior-what components of the interface searchers look at; (b) how gaze behavior differs when training is and is not provided; (c) how gaze behavior changes as searchers become familiar with the interface; and (d) how gaze behavior differs depending on the stage of the search process. The results confirm previous findings that facets account for approximately 10-30% of interface use. They show that providing a 60-second video demonstration increased searcher use of facets. However, searcher use of the facets did not evolve during the study session, which suggests that searchers may not, on their own, rapidly apply the faceted interfaces. The findings also suggest that searcher use of interface elements varied by the stage of their search during the session, with higher use of facets during decision-making stages. These findings will be of interest to librarians and interface designers who wish to maximize the value of faceted searching for patrons, as well as to researchers who study search behavior.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.114-138
    Type
    a
  9. Ramdeen, S.; Hemminger, B.M.: ¬A tale of two interfaces : how facets affect the library catalog search (2012) 0.02 
    0.024721378 = product of:
  0.061803445 = sum of:
    0.006814678 = weight(_text_:a in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006814678 = score(doc=87,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In the summer of 2008 all University of North Carolina libraries switched from a traditional library catalog interface supporting text-based searching (TextOnly) to a text and facet-based interface (TextFacet) to improve users' search experiences. This study seeks to understand the differences between these two interfaces and how they affect the search experience of the novice user. In this study, 40 participants were asked to search for resources using both interfaces. Their search times and accuracy were measured across three types of search tasks (known, partially known, and exploratory). After completing the searches, they were asked a series of questions about their experiences. The data were analyzed in order to identify strengths and weaknesses in both search interfaces. Thirty-six out of 40 participants preferred the TextFacet interface to the TextOnly interface. Using three dependent variables-time, accuracy, and rating-the two interfaces were compared and interactions were tested with the three task types. Search times for the TextFacet were shorter and participants preferred the TextFacet search interface over the TextOnly search interface. Performances across the three task types were different in terms of search time. The partially known and exploratory task types showed similar distributions for rating and accuracy. These distributions were distinctly different from the known task type. The results of this study may assist libraries in developing improved library catalog search interfaces that utilize facets as well as text searching.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.702-715
    Type
    a
  10. Bates, M.J.; Wilde, D.N.; Siegfried, S.: ¬An analysis of search terminology used by humanities scholars : the Getty online searching project report number 1 (1993) 0.02 
    0.024433602 = product of:
  0.061084002 = sum of:
    0.006095233 = weight(_text_:a in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006095233 = score(doc=2707,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=2707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Getty art history information program carried out a two-year project to study how humanities scholars operate as end users of online databases. Visiting scholars at the Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities in Santa Monica, California, were offered the opportunity to so unlimited subsidized searching of DIALOG databases. This first report from the project analyzes the vocabulary terms twenty-two scholars used in their natural language descriptions of their information needs and in their online searches. The data were extracted from 165 natural language statements and 1.068 search terms. Vocabulary categories used by humanities scholars were found to differ markedly from those used in the sciences, a fact that imposes distinctive demands on thesaurus development and the design of online information systems. Humanities scholars searched for far more named individuals, geographical terms, chronological terms, and discipline terms than was the case in a comparative science sample. The analysis provides substantial support for the growing perception that information needs of humanities scholars are distinct from those of scholars in other fields, and that the design of information-providing systems for these scholars must take their unique qualitites into account
    Source
    Library quarterly. 63(1993) no.1, S.1-39
    Type
    a
  11. Koch, T.; Golub, K.; Ardö, A.: Users browsing behaviour in a DDC-based Web service : a log analysis (2006) 0.02 
    0.024321917 = product of:
  0.06080479 = sum of:
    0.008177614 = weight(_text_:a in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008177614 = score(doc=2234,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
    0.05262718 = product of:
      0.10525436 = sum of:
        0.10525436 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10525436 = score(doc=2234,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.487652 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This study explores the navigation behaviour of all users of a large web service, Renardus, using web log analysis. Renardus provides integrated searching and browsing access to quality-controlled web resources from major individual subject gateway services. The main navigation feature is subject browsing through the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) based on mapping of classes of resources from the distributed gateways to the DDC structure. Among the more surprising results are the hugely dominant share of browsing activities, the good use of browsing support features like the graphical fish-eye overviews, rather long and varied navigation sequences, as well as extensive hierarchical directory-style browsing through the large DDC system.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
    Type
    a
  12. Balatsoukas, P.; Ruthven, I.: ¬An eye-tracking approach to the analysis of relevance judgments on the Web : the case of Google search engine (2012) 0.02 
    0.024106959 = product of:
  0.060267396 = sum of:
    0.005278627 = weight(_text_:a in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005278627 = score(doc=379,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Eye movement data can provide an in-depth view of human reasoning and the decision-making process, and modern information retrieval (IR) research can benefit from the analysis of this type of data. The aim of this research was to examine the relationship between relevance criteria use and visual behavior in the context of predictive relevance judgments. To address this objective, a multimethod research design was employed that involved observation of participants' eye movements, talk-aloud protocols, and postsearch interviews. Specifically, the results reported in this article came from the analysis of 281 predictive relevance judgments made by 24 participants using the Google search engine. We present a novel stepwise methodological framework for the analysis of relevance judgments and eye movements on the Web and show new patterns of relevance criteria use during predictive relevance judgment. For example, the findings showed an effect of ranking order and surrogate components (Title, Summary, and URL) on the use of relevance criteria. Also, differences were observed in the cognitive effort spent between very relevant and not relevant judgments. We conclude with the implications of this study for IR research.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1728-1746
    Type
    a
  13. Bank, C.: ¬Die Usability von Online-Wörterbüchern und elektronischen Sprachportalen (2012) 0.02 
    0.0237195 = product of:
  0.05929875 = sum of:
    0.0043099807 = weight(_text_:a in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043099807 = score(doc=566,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit untersucht die Usability von Online-Wörterbüchern und elektronischen Sprachportalen und soll eine Brücke zwischen der Usability von Websites hinsichtlich softwareergonomischer Normen und Konventionen und Wörterbüchern in elektronischer Form schlagen. Die einzige Usability-Methode, mit der es möglich ist, konkrete und empirisch belegte Aussagen darüber zu treffen, wie potentielle Nutzer ein Online-Wörterbuch verwenden und welche Probleme dabei festgestellt werden, ist ein Usability- Test mit realen Benutzern. Als Untersuchungsgegenstand dient das Online-Wortschatz-Informationssystem Deutsch (Owid), die Base lexicale du français (BLF) und das elektronische Lernerwörterbuch Deutsch-Italienisch (Eldit). Die Arbeit setzt sich aus vier verschiedenen empirischen Studien zusammen. Da ein Usability-Test immer nur einen Ausschnitt an Funktionalitäten aus einem gesamten System widerspiegeln kann, wurden mithilfe einer empirischen Fragebogen-Studie zunächst die für den Benutzer wichtigsten und am meisten verwendeten Funktionen eines Online-Wörterbuchs identifiziert und als Grundlage für den Test gewählt. Eine anschließende heuristische Evaluation trug potentielle Usability-Probleme der drei Online- Wörterbücher zusammen und stellte die Grundlage für die Thesenstellung des Usability-Tests dar. Der Test setzte sich aus zwei empirischen Teilen zusammen: Einem Aufgabenteil, den die Testperson für jedes der drei Online-Wörterbüchern einzeln bearbeiten und dabei die Testmethode des lauten Denkens anwenden musste und einem Post-Test- Fragebogen, der direkt nach dem Bearbeiten des jeweiligen Aufgabenkatalogs ausgefüllt wurde. Der gesamte Test wurde mit Morae, einer Software u. a. für Software- und Website- Usability-Tests, durchgeführt und ausgewertet.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.6, S.345-360
    Type
    a
  14. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.02 
    0.019154768 = product of:
  0.04788692 = sum of:
    0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008533326 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
    0.039353594 = product of:
      0.07870719 = sum of:
        0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07870719 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
    Type
    a
  15. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02 
    0.019154768 = product of:
  0.04788692 = sum of:
    0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008533326 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
    0.039353594 = product of:
      0.07870719 = sum of:
        0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07870719 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
    Type
    a
  16. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.02 
    0.017630242 = product of:
  0.044075605 = sum of:
    0.010343953 = weight(_text_:a in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010343953 = score(doc=2973,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
    0.03373165 = product of:
      0.0674633 = sum of:
        0.0674633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0674633 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
    Type
    a
  17. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.01 
    0.012896056 = product of:
  0.03224014 = sum of:
    0.009752372 = weight(_text_:a in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009752372 = score(doc=3687,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
    0.022487769 = product of:
      0.044975538 = sum of:
        0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044975538 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
    Type
    a
  18. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01 
    0.012386131 = product of:
  0.030965328 = sum of:
    0.01128853 = weight(_text_:a in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01128853 = score(doc=760,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.019676797 = product of:
      0.039353594 = sum of:
        0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353594 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
    Type
    a
  19. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.01 
    0.012386131 = product of:
  0.030965328 = sum of:
    0.01128853 = weight(_text_:a in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01128853 = score(doc=883,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.019676797 = product of:
      0.039353594 = sum of:
        0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353594 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
    Type
    a
  20. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.012386131 = product of:
  0.030965328 = sum of:
    0.01128853 = weight(_text_:a in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01128853 = score(doc=3599,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
    0.019676797 = product of:
      0.039353594 = sum of:
        0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353594 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 570
  • el 9
  • r 7
  • m 4
  • b 2
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications