Search (375 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Hopkinson, A. (Bearb.): Implementation notes for users of the Common Communication Format for bibliographic information (CCF/B) (1993) 0.07 
    0.06500076 = product of:
  0.16250189 = sum of:
    0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008533326 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
    0.15396856 = weight(_text_:63 in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15396856 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.75759465 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    V,63 S
  2. Beall, J.; Mitchell, J.S.: History of the representation of the DDC in the MARC Classification Format (2010) 0.06 
    0.06378592 = product of:
  0.10630986 = sum of:
    0.0074651055 = weight(_text_:a in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074651055 = score(doc=3568,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
    0.043855984 = product of:
      0.08771197 = sum of:
        0.08771197 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08771197 = score(doc=3568,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.4063767 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This article explores the history of the representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) in the Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC) formats, with a special emphasis on the development of the MARC classification format. Until 2009, the format used to represent the DDC has been a proprietary one that predated the development of the MARC classification format. The need to replace the current editorial support system, the desire to deliver DDC data in a variety of formats to support different uses, and the increasingly global context of editorial work with translation partners around the world prompted the Dewey editorial team, along with OCLC research and development colleagues, to rethink the underlying representation of the DDC and choose the MARC 21 formats for classification and authority data. The discussion is framed with quotes from the writings of Nancy J. Williamson, whose analysis of the content of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) schedules played a key role in shaping the original MARC classification format.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue: Is there a catalog in your future? Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.48-63
    Type
    a
  3. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 49. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. und 24. November 2005 in Köln (2006) 0.06 
    0.062029965 = product of:
  0.15507491 = sum of:
    0.0015238082 = weight(_text_:a in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0015238082 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.03184872 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
    0.1535511 = sum of:
      0.13367453 = weight(_text_:melvil in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13367453 = score(doc=632,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.316871 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494574 = queryNorm
          0.4218579 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.019876566 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019876566 = score(doc=632,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.041494574 = queryNorm
          0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    MARC21 als Austauschformat Die Expertengruppe Datenformate hat in ihrer 5. Sitzung am 22. November 2005 die Frage der Hierarchienabbildung bei der Übernahme von MARC 21 weiter diskutiert und einer Lösung zugeführt. Für einen geringen Prozentsatz der Daten werden trotz Vorarbeiten der Expertengruppe Probleme bei der Überführung von MARC-21-Daten in MAB2-Strukturen gesehen. Es wurde darauf hingewiesen, dass es im Zusammenhang mit dem Umstieg auf MARC 21 ebenso wie bei der kooperativen Katalogisierung notwendig ist, gemeinsame Regeln festzulegen und Absprachen zwischen den Verbünden zu treffen. Eine unterschiedliche Handhabung des Formats sollte sich von vornherein verbieten. Projekt Kooperative Neukatalogisierung Die Projektgruppe hat zweimal getagt, zuletzt am 3. November 2005. Es liegen erste Ergebnisse vor, und spätestens Anfang Januar 2006 soll das Verfahren erprobt werden. Alle Verbünde signalisieren ihr Interesse an dem geplanten Verfahren, da die Eigenkatalogisierungsrate nach wie vor zu hoch ist. Für die Akzeptanz des Dienstes, der auch zum Synchronisieren der vorhandenen Aufnahmen und zum Austausch von Sacherschließungsdaten genutzt werden soll, ist die Aktualität des geplanten Neukatalogisierungspools essentiell. Ein weiteres Ziel ist auch die Optimierung der Arbeitsabläufe zwischen Verbundzentrale und Bibliotheken. Catalogue Enrichment Zur Anreicherung der Katalogdaten gibt es verschiedene Aktivitäten innerhalb der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme, die koordiniert werden müssen, damit eine Mehrfachdigitalisierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen, Abstracts und anderen Objekten vermieden werden kann. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme beschließt, eine kleine Arbeitsgruppe einzusetzen, die bis spätestens Anfang Februar 2006 einen Vorschlag mit unterschiedlichen Szenarien für unterschiedliche Umgebungen vorlegen soll. Aufgabe der AG Datenanreicherung ist die Konzeption eines schnellen Dienstes für die Digitalisierung von Abstracts und Inhaltsverzeichnissen sofern sie lizenzrechtlich frei verfügbar sind, die allen Verbünden zur Verfügung gestellt werden sollen. Dazu gehören eine Übersicht über die vorhandenen Daten und eine ausgearbeitete Verfahrensvorschrift für das künftige Vorgehen.
    DDC/Melvil-Nutzungs- und Lizenzsituation Die Deutsche Bibliothek hat den Dienst Melvil vorgestellt, der auf der im Rahmen des Projektes DDC Deutsch erstellten deutschen Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC basiert, und die Such- und Sprachgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzerinnen und Benutzer berücksichtigt. Mit Melvil wurde ein Online-Dienst entwickelt, der Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen außer einem an WebDewey orientierten Klassifikationstool MelvilClass auch ein Retrievaltool MelvilSearch für die verbale Suche nach DDC-erschlossenen Dokumenten und das Browsing in der DDC-Hierarchie zur Verfügung stellt. Über die Schnittstelle MelvilSoap können Bibliotheken und Verbundzentralen, die den Dienst Melvil lizenziert haben, auch DDC-Daten zur weiteren Nutzung herunterladen. Gegenwärtig vergibt Die Deutsche Bibliothek Testlizenzen, ab 2006 kann der Dienst nach einem gestaffelten Modell kostenpflichtig genutzt werden Ergebnisse der Adhoc-Arbeitsgruppe ISBD(CR) Der Standardisierungsausschuss hatte in seiner 9. Sitzung am 15. Dezember 2004 die Anpassung der Splitregeln bei fortlaufenden Sammelwerken an die ISBD(CR) mit dem Ziel der Übernahme beschlossen. Im Januar 2005 richtete die Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung eine Ad-hoc-AG ISBD(CR) ein, in der Vertreter der ZDB, der Expertengruppe Formalerschließung und der AGDBT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Datenbankteilnehmer der ZDB) unter der Federführung der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung zusammenarbeiteten. Auftragsgemäß konnte dem Standardisierungsausschuss am 2. August 2005 ein entscheidungsreifer Entwurf zur Anwendung der ISBD(CR)-Splitregeln für fortlaufende Sammelwerke vorgelegt werden. Die Unterlage, die dem Standardisierungsausschuss zu seiner 11. Sitzung am 1. Dezember 2005 zugeleitet wurde, wurde den Mitgliedern der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme im Vorfeld der Sitzung zur Kenntnis gegeben. Die zeitnahe Anwendung der ISBD(CR)-Splitregeln würde nicht nur in einem kleinen abgeschlossenen Bereich eine Angleichung an internationale Gepflogenheiten bedeuten, sondern sie hätte auch einige positive Auswirkungen auf die von Zeitschriftentiteln abhängigen ergänzenden Dienstleistungen. So würde z.B. die Verlinkung mit SFX-Diensten erheblich erleichtert."
    Type
    a
  4. Studwell, W.E.: Format integration : the most invisible new major change in cataloging (1995) 0.05 
    0.047439 = product of:
  0.1185975 = sum of:
    0.008619961 = weight(_text_:a in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008619961 = score(doc=4440,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
    0.109977536 = weight(_text_:63 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109977536 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.541139 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses USMARC format integration, which officially took place in early 1995. Provides a short background to the development of bibliographic systms for online databases in the late 1960s and early 1970s, explaining the need for simplifying online catalog format standards
    Source
    Behavioral and social sciences librarian. 14(1995) no.1, S.63-65
    Type
    a
  5. Kokabi, M.: ¬The Iranian adaptation of UNIMARC (1997) 0.04 
    0.0379512 = product of:
  0.094878 = sum of:
    0.006895969 = weight(_text_:a in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006895969 = score(doc=537,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
    0.087982036 = weight(_text_:63 in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087982036 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.43291122 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Outline of a thesis produced at the University of New South Wales School of Information, Library and Archive Studies, the first serious study of MARC for Iran despite 12 years of the presence of computers in Iranian libraries. Considers the various MARC formats, reasons for choosing UNIMARC, and the use of the Farsi language in machines. Lists the modifications required to UNIMARC for use in the Iranian National Bibliography
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 26(1997) no.3, S.63-65
    Type
    a
  6. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse (Erfassung) von Dokumenten (1990) 0.04 
    0.03714329 = product of:
  0.092858225 = sum of:
    0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004876186 = score(doc=1535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
    0.087982036 = weight(_text_:63 in 1535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087982036 = score(doc=1535,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.43291122 = fieldWeight in 1535, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1535)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.63-89
    Type
    a
  7. Springer: Neues Online-Tool zum Herunterladen (2011) 0.03 
    0.03250038 = product of:
  0.08125094 = sum of:
    0.004266663 = weight(_text_:a in 4716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004266663 = score(doc=4716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4716)
    0.07698428 = weight(_text_:63 in 4716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07698428 = score(doc=4716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.37879732 = fieldWeight in 4716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4716)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    BuB. 63(2011) H.11/12, S.789
    Type
    a
  8. Beall, J.: Representation DDC system in MARC 21 (2008) 0.03 
    0.031233285 = product of:
  0.07808321 = sum of:
    0.0036571398 = weight(_text_:a in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036571398 = score(doc=2167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
    0.07442607 = product of:
      0.14885214 = sum of:
        0.14885214 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14885214 = score(doc=2167,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6896441 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Magda Heiner-Freiling argued for assignment of extra DDC numbers for improved access, including table numbers and other parts of numbers as well as fully built numbers, and for coding to identify component parts of built numbers. Changes to the MARC 21 Bibliographic format that support her approach are found in MARC Proposal No. 2008-01 Representation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System in MARC 21 formats. The new 083 Additional Dewey Decimal Classification Number field is used for assignment of extra Dewey numbers for improved access. The new 085 Synthesized Classification Number Components field is used to identify component parts of built Dewey numbers. This paper uses specific examples to show how the new fields can help improve access.
    Type
    a
  9. Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 56. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. April 2009 in Wien : ein Bericht (2009) 0.03 
    0.028868 = product of:
  0.04811333 = sum of:
    0.0030476165 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0030476165 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
    0.031010862 = product of:
      0.062021725 = sum of:
        0.062021725 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062021725 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2873517 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014054855 = product of:
      0.02810971 = sum of:
        0.02810971 = weight(_text_:22 in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02810971 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    Darin auch ein Abschnitt zu CrissCross: "Ziel des Projekts ist die Schaffung eines multilingualen, thesaurusbasierten und benutzerorientierten Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokurrenten für die Nutzer des deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesens. Dazu werden die Sachschlagwörter der SWD mit den Notationen der Dewey Dezimalklassifikation verbunden sowie mit ihren Äquivalenten in LCSH und Rameau verknüpft. Das Projektende ist nach Verlängerung des Projektantrags April 2010. In dem Berichtszeitraum wurde die Vergabe von DDC-Notationen für SWD-Terme in dem Katalogisierungsclient WinIBW fortgeführt. Änderungen in dem Redaktionsverfahren der SWD, das im ONS-Projekt eingeführt worden ist, haben sich auf die Arbeitsweise und den Workflow des CrissCross-Projektes ausgewirkt und mussten entsprechend angepasst werden. Nach wie vor steht DNB in Kontakt mit den Betreibern der MACS-Datenbank, die als Arbeitsumgebung für die Verlinkung der multilingualen Terme genutzt werden soll. Im Berichtszeitraum wurden keine größeren IT-Aktivitäten notwendig. Ab April 2009 wird die eigentliche Verlinkungsarbeit beginnen und dann sind auch begleitende IT-Maßnahmen zu erwarten."
    Date
    22. 8.2009 13:11:01
    Type
    a
  10. Krischker, U.: Formale Analyse von Dokumenten (1997) 0.03 
    0.027857468 = product of:
  0.06964367 = sum of:
    0.0036571398 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036571398 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.63-87
    Type
    a
  11. Nolte, A.: Zeit des Abschieds : Nach der Mark gehen nun auch RAK und MAB. Standardisierungsausschuss beschließt Umstieg auf MARC und AACR (2002) 0.02 
    0.02260534 = product of:
  0.05651335 = sum of:
    0.006895969 = weight(_text_:a in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006895969 = score(doc=573,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
    0.04961738 = product of:
      0.09923476 = sum of:
        0.09923476 = weight(_text_:dewey in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09923476 = score(doc=573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.45976272 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung darauf zum Aspekt DDC: Heiner-Freiling, M.: Und künftig Dewey? In BuB 54(2002) H.5, S.300-303.
    Type
    a
  12. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02 
    0.022007218 = product of:
  0.05501804 = sum of:
    0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073142797 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.04770376 = product of:
      0.09540752 = sum of:
        0.09540752 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09540752 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
    Type
    a
  13. Oehlschläger, S.: Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme : Aus der 46. Sitzung am 21. und 22. April 2004 im Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg in Konstanz (2004) 0.02 
    0.020207603 = product of:
  0.033679336 = sum of:
    0.0021333315 = weight(_text_:a in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0021333315 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
    0.021707604 = product of:
      0.043415207 = sum of:
        0.043415207 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043415207 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.20114619 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009838399 = product of:
      0.019676797 = sum of:
        0.019676797 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019676797 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    - Elektronischer DDC-Dienst Im Fall der deutschen Übersetzung der Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) wurde die Idee einer Normdatei DDC-Deutsch zugunsten eines zentralen elektronischen DDC-Dienstes bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek aufgegeben. Dieser Dienst hält die übersetzten Daten bereit und stellt sie in drei verschiedenen Ausprägungen zur Verfügung: 1. Zentrales Such- und Browsingtool für Benutzer 2. Klassifikationswerkzeug für Sacherschließer 3. SOAP-Schnittstelle für den elektronischen Datenaustausch. Um die DDC künftig gewinnbringend in der Benutzung einsetzen zu können, werden Konkordanzen zu anderen Klassifikationen, insbesondere aber zur weit verbreiteten Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK) benötigt. Mithilfe dieser Konkordanzen können Benutzer im OPAL Der Deutschen Bibliothek nach DDC-Notationen suchen und würden zusätzlich Ergebnisse aus den Verbünden angezeigt bekommen, die bislang nicht mit der DDC erschlossen sind. Der GBV plant eine Grunderschließung seiner Verbunddatenbank mit der DDC in 5 Ebenen. Ziel ist es, bis Ende 2005 alle Verbunddaten mit der DDC zu verbinden und damit ein bedeutendes Recherchetool zu erhalten.
    Type
    a
  14. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02 
    0.019154768 = product of:
  0.04788692 = sum of:
    0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008533326 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
    0.039353594 = product of:
      0.07870719 = sum of:
        0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07870719 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
    Type
    a
  15. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02 
    0.019154768 = product of:
  0.04788692 = sum of:
    0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008533326 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
    0.039353594 = product of:
      0.07870719 = sum of:
        0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07870719 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  16. USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991) 0.02 
    0.019072749 = product of:
  0.04768187 = sum of:
    0.004266663 = weight(_text_:a in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004266663 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
    0.043415207 = product of:
      0.086830415 = sum of:
        0.086830415 = weight(_text_:dewey in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086830415 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.40229237 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
  17. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02 
    0.01749867 = product of:
  0.043746673 = sum of:
    0.011944169 = weight(_text_:a in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011944169 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
    0.031802505 = product of:
      0.06360501 = sum of:
        0.06360501 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06360501 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
    Type
    a
  18. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.014671477 = product of:
  0.03667869 = sum of:
    0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004876186 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
    0.031802505 = product of:
      0.06360501 = sum of:
        0.06360501 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06360501 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
    Type
    a
  19. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01 
    0.014086909 = product of:
  0.03521727 = sum of:
    0.0073900777 = weight(_text_:a in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073900777 = score(doc=5100,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
    0.027827194 = product of:
      0.055654388 = sum of:
        0.055654388 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055654388 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Briefly summarizes the problems encountered when attempting to use the USMARC cataloguing format in US school libraries and describes the development of CEMARC format by the Northwest Ohio Educational Technology Foundation (NWOET), which addresses the main problems by: offering sata entry guidelines for a minimum USMARC standard in order to clarify inconsistencies in application; and by suggesting enhancements and new fields that go beyond the USMARC standard. Concludes with brief notes on early CEMARC implementation
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
    Type
    a
  20. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01 
    0.013772775 = product of:
  0.034431938 = sum of:
    0.011944169 = weight(_text_:a in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011944169 = score(doc=4414,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
    0.022487769 = product of:
      0.044975538 = sum of:
        0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044975538 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 32(1995) no.3, S.i-iv
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 17
  • el 14
  • s 10
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications