Search (248 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Olson, H.A.: ¬The ubiquitous hierarchy : an army to overcome the threat of a mob (2004) 0.12 
    0.11986526 = product of:
  0.19977543 = sum of:
    0.006895969 = weight(_text_:a in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006895969 = score(doc=833,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
    0.085939825 = product of:
      0.17187965 = sum of:
        0.17187965 = weight(_text_:dewey in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17187965 = score(doc=833,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.7963324 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.10693963 = product of:
      0.21387926 = sum of:
        0.21387926 = weight(_text_:melvil in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21387926 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.316871 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.67497265 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This article explores the connections between Melvil Dewey and Hegelianism and Charles Cutter and the Scottish Common Sense philosophers. It traces the practice of hierarchy from these philosophical influences to Dewey and Cutter and their legacy to today's Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Subject Headings. The ubiquity of hierarchy is linked to Dewey's and Cutter's metaphor of organizing the mob of information into an orderly army using the tool of logic.
    Type
    a
  2. Tennis, J.T.: ¬The strange case of eugenics : a subject's ontogeny in a long-lived classification scheme and the question of collocative integrity (2012) 0.09 
    0.08910175 = product of:
  0.1485029 = sum of:
    0.010903485 = weight(_text_:a in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010903485 = score(doc=275,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
    0.087982036 = weight(_text_:63 in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087982036 = score(doc=275,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.43291122 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
    0.04961738 = product of:
      0.09923476 = sum of:
        0.09923476 = weight(_text_:dewey in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09923476 = score(doc=275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.45976272 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This article introduces the problem of collocative integrity present in long-lived classification schemes that undergo several changes. A case study of the subject "eugenics" in the Dewey Decimal Classification is presented to illustrate this phenomenon. Eugenics is strange because of the kinds of changes it undergoes. The article closes with a discussion of subject ontogeny as the name for this phenomenon and describes implications for information searching and browsing.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1350-1359
    Type
    a
  3. Batty, D.: ¬The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research (1989) 0.08 
    0.07535723 = product of:
  0.12559538 = sum of:
    0.008177614 = weight(_text_:a in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008177614 = score(doc=2070,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
    0.037213035 = product of:
      0.07442607 = sum of:
        0.07442607 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07442607 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.34482205 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.080204725 = product of:
      0.16040945 = sum of:
        0.16040945 = weight(_text_:melvil in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16040945 = score(doc=2070,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.316871 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5062295 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.636444 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    One by one, the noble characteristics that we have chosen in the past to set us apart from other species have fallen before the march of zoological research - othe species can laugh, grieve, use tools, communicate by sound alone, and analyze and respond to complex stimulis well as we. But one trait is ours. We are lisvmakers - eben when we do not use the lists we make. The development of classification has been long and full of false starts, reflective of contemporary intellectual persuasions; from a desire to classify the entire universe, to a conviction that classification is pointless beyond an extemely small universe of discourse. Yet we have achieved an impressive body of theory. We have expressed what Melvil Dewey and his contemporaries only felt. Should we ever use it in a practical way? The upward curve has not been smooth, but for most of those involved, it was and has been fun, and sometimes funny. Only by retaining a sense of perspective can we view the future.
    Type
    a
  4. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.07 
    0.07012404 = product of:
  0.11687339 = sum of:
    0.008445803 = weight(_text_:a in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008445803 = score(doc=1171,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
    0.085939825 = product of:
      0.17187965 = sum of:
        0.17187965 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17187965 = score(doc=1171,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.7963324 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.022487769 = product of:
      0.044975538 = sum of:
        0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044975538 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    All classifications are based on ideologies and Dewey is marked by its author's origins in 19th century North America. Subsequent revisions indicate changed ways of understanding the world. Section 157 (psycho-pathology) is now included with 616.89 (mental troubles), reflecting the move to a genetic-based approach. Table 5 (racial, ethnic and national groups) is however unchanged, despite changing views on such categorisation
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Concerning the Dewey classification
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
    Type
    a
  5. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.04 
    0.04228925 = product of:
  0.07048208 = sum of:
    0.0073900777 = weight(_text_:a in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073900777 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.043415207 = product of:
      0.086830415 = sum of:
        0.086830415 = weight(_text_:dewey in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086830415 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.40229237 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.019676797 = product of:
      0.039353594 = sum of:
        0.039353594 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039353594 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The idea of sameness is used to gather material in classifications. However, it is also used to separate what is different. Sameness and difference as guiding principles of classification seem obvious but are actually fundamental characteristics specifically related to Western culture. Sameness is not a singular factor, but has the potential to represent multiple characteristics or facets. This article explores the ramifications of which characteristics are used to define classifications and in what order. It explains the primacy of division by discipline, its origins in Western philosophy, and the cultural specificity that results. The Dewey Decimal Classification is used as an example throughout.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  6. Szostak, R.: ¬A pluralistic approach to the philosophy of classification : a case for "public knowledge" (2015) 0.04 
    0.035309125 = product of:
  0.08827281 = sum of:
    0.01128853 = weight(_text_:a in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01128853 = score(doc=5541,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
    0.07698428 = weight(_text_:63 in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07698428 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.37879732 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Any classification system should be evaluated with respect to a variety of philosophical and practical concerns. This paper explores several distinct issues: the nature of a work, the value of a statement, the contribution of information science to philosophy, the nature of hierarchy, ethical evaluation, pre- versus postcoordination, the lived experience of librarians, and formalization versus natural language. It evaluates a particular approach to classification in terms of each of these but draws general lessons for philosophical evaluation. That approach to classification emphasizes the free combination of basic concepts representing both real things in the world and the relationships among these; works are also classified in terms of theories, methods, and perspectives applied.
    Source
    Library trends. 63(2015) no.3, S.591-614
    Type
    a
  7. Satija, M.P.; Oh, D.-G.: ¬The DDC and the knowledge categories : Dewey did faceting without knowing it (2017) 0.03 
    0.03269614 = product of:
  0.08174035 = sum of:
    0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073142797 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
    0.07442607 = product of:
      0.14885214 = sum of:
        0.14885214 = weight(_text_:dewey in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14885214 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.6896441 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Type
    a
  8. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.03 
    0.032211408 = product of:
  0.05368568 = sum of:
    0.008619961 = weight(_text_:a in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008619961 = score(doc=2282,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
    0.031010862 = product of:
      0.062021725 = sum of:
        0.062021725 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062021725 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.2873517 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014054855 = product of:
      0.02810971 = sum of:
        0.02810971 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02810971 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The structure of a classification system contributes in a variety of ways to representing semantic relationships between its topics in the context of subject authority control. We explore this claim using the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system as a case study. The DDC links its classes into a notational hierarchy, supplemented by a network of relationships between topics, expressed in class descriptions and in the Relative Index (RI). Topics/subjects are expressed both by the natural language text of the caption and notes (including Manual notes) in a class description and by the controlled vocabulary of the RI's alphabetic index, which shows where topics are treated in the classificatory structure. The expression of relationships between topics depends on paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships between natural language terms in captions, notes, and RI terms; on the meaning of specific note types; and on references recorded between RI terms. The specific means used in the DDC for capturing hierarchical (including disciplinary), equivalence and associative relationships are surveyed.
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
    Type
    a
  9. Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification : A guide to construction and use of special schemes (1986) 0.03 
    0.030532194 = product of:
  0.07633048 = sum of:
    0.010343953 = weight(_text_:a in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010343953 = score(doc=2475,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A perfect little book, with just 63 pages of text. From chapter A, Introduction, to U, Mechanization, it covers everything about making a faceted classification: what they are, why they are needed, how to do facet analysis, examples from existing faceted schemes, orderings, common subdivisions, the contents of each facet, notation, filing order, how to perform classification with the created system, and indexing. Each chapter is brief but has full coverage of the subject. "The technique of constructing a special faceted classification is not a settled, automatic, codified procedure. Nothing so complex as the field of knowledge could be analysed and organized by rule-of-thumb. We can therefore offer no more than a guide, describing tested procedures and discussing some difficulties." Vickery was a member of the Classification Research Group and one of the foremost classificationists.
  10. Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006) 0.03 
    0.030264964 = product of:
  0.07566241 = sum of:
    0.009675884 = weight(_text_:a in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009675884 = score(doc=534,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
    0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06598653 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
    Source
    New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 12(2006) no.1, S.63-81
    Type
    a
  11. Midorikawa, N.: Is the synthetic expression method of the Dewey Decimal Classification an effective device for treating complex subjects? (1997) 0.03 
    0.028256675 = product of:
  0.07064169 = sum of:
    0.008619961 = weight(_text_:a in 6335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008619961 = score(doc=6335,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 6335, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6335)
    0.062021725 = product of:
      0.12404345 = sum of:
        0.12404345 = weight(_text_:dewey in 6335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12404345 = score(doc=6335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.5747034 = fieldWeight in 6335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Consideres enumeration as a more effective device than the synthetic method of the DDC
    Type
    a
  12. Green, R.; Panzer, M.: ¬The ontological character of classes in the Dewey Decimal Classification 0.03 
    0.02697294 = product of:
  0.06743235 = sum of:
    0.0060339733 = weight(_text_:a in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060339733 = score(doc=3530,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
    0.061398376 = product of:
      0.12279675 = sum of:
        0.12279675 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12279675 = score(doc=3530,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.56892735 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Classes in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system function as neighborhoods around focal topics in captions and notes. Topical neighborhoods are generated through specialization and instantiation, complex topic synthesis, index terms and mapped headings, hierarchical force, rules for choosing between numbers, development of the DDC over time, and use of the system in classifying resources. Implications of representation using a formal knowledge representation language are explored.
    Type
    a
  13. Ranganathan, S.R.; Gopinath, M.A.: Prolegomena to library classification (1967) 0.03 
    0.026394611 = product of:
  0.13197306 = sum of:
    0.13197306 = weight(_text_:63 in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13197306 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.64936686 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Signature
    63 BADR 1106(3)
  14. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve" : a comment to Begthol (2003) (2004) 0.02 
    0.024721378 = product of:
  0.061803445 = sum of:
    0.006814678 = weight(_text_:a in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006814678 = score(doc=3023,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
    0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054988768 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Relationships between Knowledge Organization in LIS and Scientific & Scholarly Classifications In her paper "Classification for Information Retrieval and Classification for Knowledge Discovery: Relationships between 'Professional' and 'Naive' Classifications" (KO v30, no.2, 2003), Beghtol outlines how Scholarly activities and research lead to classification systems which subsequently are disseminated in publications which are classified in information retrieval systems, retrieved by the users and again used in Scholarly activities and so on. We think this model is correct and that its point is important. What we are reacting to is the fact that Beghtol describes the Classifications developed by scholars as "naive" while she describes the Classifications developed by librarians and information scientists as "professional." We fear that this unfortunate terminology is rooted in deeply ar chored misjudgments about the relationships between scientific and Scholarly classification an the one side and LIS Classifications an the other. Only a correction of this misjudgment may give us in the field of knowledge organization a Chance to do a job that is not totally disrespected and disregarded by the rest of the intellectual world.
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between 'professional' and 'naive' classifications" in: Knowledge organization. 30(2003), no.2, S.64-73; vgl. dazu auch die Erwiderung von C. Beghtol in: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.62-63.
    Type
    a
  15. Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008) 0.02 
    0.024557257 = product of:
  0.04092876 = sum of:
    0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004876186 = score(doc=2346,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
    0.02480869 = product of:
      0.04961738 = sum of:
        0.04961738 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04961738 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.22988136 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011243884 = product of:
      0.022487769 = sum of:
        0.022487769 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022487769 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Potential and benefits of classification schemes and thesauri in building organizational taxonomies cannot be fully utilized by organizations. Empirical data of building an organizational taxonomy by the top-down approach of using classification schemes and thesauri appear to be lacking. The paper seeks to make a contribution in this regard. Design/methodology/approach - A case study of building an organizational taxonomy was conducted in the information studies domain for the Division of Information Studies at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. The taxonomy was built by using the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Information Science Taxonomy, two information systems taxonomies, and three thesauri (ASIS&T, LISA, and ERIC). Findings - Classification schemes and thesauri were found to be helpful in creating the structure and categories related to the subject facet of the taxonomy, but organizational community sources had to be consulted and several methods had to be employed. The organizational activities and stakeholders' needs had to be identified to determine the objectives, facets, and the subject coverage of the taxonomy. Main categories were determined by identifying the stakeholders' interests and consulting organizational community sources and domain taxonomies. Category terms were selected from terminologies of classification schemes, domain taxonomies, and thesauri against the stakeholders' interests. Hierarchical structures of the main categories were constructed in line with the stakeholders' perspectives and the navigational role taking advantage of structures/term relationships from classification schemes and thesauri. Categories were determined in line with the concepts and the hierarchical levels. Format of categories were uniformed according to a commonly used standard. The consistency principle was employed to make the taxonomy structure and categories neater. Validation of the draft taxonomy through consultations with the stakeholders further refined the taxonomy. Originality/value - No similar study could be traced in the literature. The steps and methods used in the taxonomy development, and the information studies taxonomy itself, will be helpful for library and information schools and other similar organizations in their effort to develop taxonomies for organizing content and aiding navigation on organizational sites.
    Date
    7.11.2008 15:22:04
    Type
    a
  16. Bury, S.: Comparison of classification schedules for libraries (1980) 0.02 
    0.023225274 = product of:
  0.058063183 = sum of:
    0.008445803 = weight(_text_:a in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008445803 = score(doc=1603,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
    0.04961738 = product of:
      0.09923476 = sum of:
        0.09923476 = weight(_text_:dewey in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09923476 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.45976272 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 17(1980), S.73-82
    Type
    a
  17. Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.02 
    0.02124541 = product of:
  0.053113528 = sum of:
    0.0091225095 = weight(_text_:a in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0091225095 = score(doc=2875,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.19066721 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
    0.043991018 = weight(_text_:63 in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043991018 = score(doc=2875,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.21645561 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 63(2007) no.5, S.727-754
    Type
    a
  18. Choi, I.: Visualizations of cross-cultural bibliographic classification : comparative studies of the Korean Decimal Classification and the Dewey Decimal Classification (2017) 0.02 
    0.020528436 = product of:
  0.05132109 = sum of:
    0.0074651055 = weight(_text_:a in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074651055 = score(doc=3869,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
    0.043855984 = product of:
      0.08771197 = sum of:
        0.08771197 = weight(_text_:dewey in 3869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08771197 = score(doc=3869,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.4063767 = fieldWeight in 3869, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3869)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The changes in KO systems induced by sociocultural influences may include those in both classificatory principles and cultural features. The proposed study will examine the Korean Decimal Classification (KDC)'s adaptation of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) by comparing the two systems. This case manifests the sociocultural influences on KOSs in a cross-cultural context. Therefore, the study aims at an in-depth investigation of sociocultural influences by situating a KOS in a cross-cultural environment and examining the dynamics between two classification systems designed to organize information resources in two distinct sociocultural contexts. As a preceding stage of the comparison, the analysis was conducted on the changes that result from the meeting of different sociocultural feature in a descriptive method. The analysis aims to identify variations between the two schemes in comparison of the knowledge structures of the two classifications, in terms of the quantity of class numbers that represent concepts and their relationships in each of the individual main classes. The most effective analytic strategy to show the patterns of the comparison was visualizations of similarities and differences between the two systems. Increasing or decreasing tendencies in the class through various editions were analyzed. Comparing the compositions of the main classes and distributions of concepts in the KDC and DDC discloses the differences in their knowledge structures empirically. This phase of quantitative analysis and visualizing techniques generates empirical evidence leading to interpretation.
    Type
    a
  19. Satija, M.P.: Library classification : an essay in terminology (2000) 0.02 
    0.019779673 = product of:
  0.04944918 = sum of:
    0.0060339733 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060339733 = score(doc=6091,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
    0.043415207 = product of:
      0.086830415 = sum of:
        0.086830415 = weight(_text_:dewey in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086830415 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.40229237 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Arguing that an established technical terminology is crucial to the development of a discipline, and that classification terminology is neither well settled nor widely used by its exponents, this paper provides an explanation of some of the concepts generally accepted by classification theorists. In particular, the elaborate terminology generated by S.R. Ranganathan is examined. Definitions are provided for numerous concepts, including "classification"; "characteristics" and "attributes"; the genus-species relationship; the types of classes (canonical, systems, special, and environmental main classes); the kinds of subject (basic, compound, complex); as well as concepts such as facets, isolates, arrays, and chains. Comparisons between different classification systems, specifically the Dewey Decimal Classification, Colon Classification, and Library of Congress Classification, are also made
    Type
    a
  20. Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004) 0.02 
    0.019779673 = product of:
  0.04944918 = sum of:
    0.0060339733 = weight(_text_:a in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060339733 = score(doc=2640,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041494574 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
    0.043415207 = product of:
      0.086830415 = sum of:
        0.086830415 = weight(_text_:dewey in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086830415 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21583907 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041494574 = queryNorm
            0.40229237 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 221
  • m 21
  • el 10
  • s 4
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications