-
Baloh, P.; Desouza, K.C.; Hackney, R.: Contextualizing organizational interventions of knowledge management systems : a design science perspectiveA domain analysis (2012)
0.05
0.045514982 = product of:
0.0758583 = sum of:
0.006814678 = weight(_text_:a in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006814678 = score(doc=241,freq=10.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054988768 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.014054855 = product of:
0.02810971 = sum of:
0.02810971 = weight(_text_:22 in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02810971 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- We address how individuals' (workers) knowledge needs influence the design of knowledge management systems (KMS), enabling knowledge creation and utilization. It is evident that KMS technologies and activities are indiscriminately deployed in most organizations with little regard to the actual context of their adoption. Moreover, it is apparent that the extant literature pertaining to knowledge management projects is frequently deficient in identifying the variety of factors indicative for successful KMS. This presents an obvious business practice and research gap that requires a critical analysis of the necessary intervention that will actually improve how workers can leverage and form organization-wide knowledge. This research involved an extensive review of the literature, a grounded theory methodological approach and rigorous data collection and synthesis through an empirical case analysis (Parsons Brinckerhoff and Samsung). The contribution of this study is the formulation of a model for designing KMS based upon the design science paradigm, which aspires to create artifacts that are interdependent of people and organizations. The essential proposition is that KMS design and implementation must be contextualized in relation to knowledge needs and that these will differ for various organizational settings. The findings present valuable insights and further understanding of the way in which KMS design efforts should be focused.
- Date
- 11. 6.2012 14:22:34
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.948-966
- Type
- a
-
Robertson, A.M.; Willett, P.: Use of genetic algorithms in information retrieval (1995)
0.04
0.03714329 = product of:
0.092858225 = sum of:
0.004876186 = weight(_text_:a in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004876186 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.087982036 = weight(_text_:63 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087982036 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.43291122 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reviews the basic techniques involving genetic algorithms and their application to 2 problems in information retrieval: the generation of equifrequent groups of index terms; and the identification of optimal query and term weights. The algorithm developed for the generation of equifrequent groupings proved to be effective in operation, achieving results comparable with those obtained using a good deterministic algorithm. The algorithm developed for the identification of optimal query and term weighting involves fitness function that is based on full relevance information
- Pages
- 63 S
-
Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Relevance Ranking in Online-Katalogen : Informationsstand und Perspektiven (2003)
0.03
0.03250038 = product of:
0.08125094 = sum of:
0.004266663 = weight(_text_:a in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004266663 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.07698428 = weight(_text_:63 in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07698428 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.37879732 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 56(2003) H.3/4, S.49-63
- Type
- a
-
Dominich, S.; Skrop, A.: PageRank and interaction information retrieval (2005)
0.03
0.03078318 = product of:
0.07695795 = sum of:
0.0109714195 = weight(_text_:a in 3268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0109714195 = score(doc=3268,freq=18.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 3268, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3268)
0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 3268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06598653 = score(doc=3268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 3268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3268)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The PageRank method is used by the Google Web search engine to compute the importance of Web pages. Two different views have been developed for the Interpretation of the PageRank method and values: (a) stochastic (random surfer): the PageRank values can be conceived as the steady-state distribution of a Markov chain, and (b) algebraic: the PageRank values form the eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 1 of the Web link matrix. The Interaction Information Retrieval (1**2 R) method is a nonclassical information retrieval paradigm, which represents a connectionist approach based an dynamic systems. In the present paper, a different Interpretation of PageRank is proposed, namely, a dynamic systems viewpoint, by showing that the PageRank method can be formally interpreted as a particular case of the Interaction Information Retrieval method; and thus, the PageRank values may be interpreted as neutral equilibrium points of the Web.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.63-69
- Type
- a
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Fleet, C. van: Opening the black box of "relevance work" : a domain analysis (2012)
0.03
0.029977862 = product of:
0.07494465 = sum of:
0.008958126 = weight(_text_:a in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008958126 = score(doc=247,freq=12.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06598653 = score(doc=247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=247)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In response to Hjørland's recent call for a reconceptualization of the foundations of relevance, we suggest that the sociocognitive aspects of intermediation by information agencies, such as archives and libraries, are a necessary and unexplored part of the infrastructure of the subject knowledge domains central to his recommended "view of relevance informed by a social paradigm" (2010, p. 217). From a comparative analysis of documents from 39 graduate-level introductory courses in archives, reference, and strategic/competitive intelligence taught in 13 American Library Association-accredited library and information science (LIS) programs, we identify four defining sociocognitive dimensions of "relevance work" in information agencies within Hjørland's proposed framework for relevance: tasks, time, systems, and assessors. This study is intended to supply sociocognitive content from within the relevance work domain to support further domain analytic research, and to emphasize the importance of intermediary relevance work for all subject knowledge domains.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.936-947
- Type
- a
-
Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing mit Katalogdaten : Alternative Sicht auf Suchergebnisse und Publikationsquellen durch Re-Ranking (2010)
0.03
0.027857468 = product of:
0.06964367 = sum of:
0.0036571398 = weight(_text_:a in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036571398 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06598653 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- BuB. 62(2010) H.1, S.61-63
- Type
- a
-
Oberhauser, O.: Relevance Ranking in den Online-Katalogen der "nächsten Generation" (2010)
0.03
0.027857468 = product of:
0.06964367 = sum of:
0.0036571398 = weight(_text_:a in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036571398 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.06598653 = weight(_text_:63 in 4308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06598653 = score(doc=4308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.32468343 = fieldWeight in 4308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4308)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 63(2010) H.1/2, S.25-37
- Type
- a
-
Lalmas, M.: XML retrieval (2009)
0.03
0.02603863 = product of:
0.06509657 = sum of:
0.010107801 = weight(_text_:a in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010107801 = score(doc=4998,freq=22.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054988768 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Documents usually have a content and a structure. The content refers to the text of the document, whereas the structure refers to how a document is logically organized. An increasingly common way to encode the structure is through the use of a mark-up language. Nowadays, the most widely used mark-up language for representing structure is the eXtensible Mark-up Language (XML). XML can be used to provide a focused access to documents, i.e. returning XML elements, such as sections and paragraphs, instead of whole documents in response to a query. Such focused strategies are of particular benefit for information repositories containing long documents, or documents covering a wide variety of topics, where users are directed to the most relevant content within a document. The increased adoption of XML to represent a document structure requires the development of tools to effectively access documents marked-up in XML. This book provides a detailed description of query languages, indexing strategies, ranking algorithms, presentation scenarios developed to access XML documents. Major advances in XML retrieval were seen from 2002 as a result of INEX, the Initiative for Evaluation of XML Retrieval. INEX, also described in this book, provided test sets for evaluating XML retrieval effectiveness. Many of the developments and results described in this book were investigated within INEX.
- Signature
- 63 BCA 214-7
-
Costa Carvalho, A. da; Rossi, C.; Moura, E.S. de; Silva, A.S. da; Fernandes, D.: LePrEF: Learn to precompute evidence fusion for efficient query evaluation (2012)
0.03
0.025850473 = product of:
0.06462618 = sum of:
0.00963741 = weight(_text_:a in 278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00963741 = score(doc=278,freq=20.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 278, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=278)
0.054988768 = weight(_text_:63 in 278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054988768 = score(doc=278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.2705695 = fieldWeight in 278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=278)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- State-of-the-art search engine ranking methods combine several distinct sources of relevance evidence to produce a high-quality ranking of results for each query. The fusion of information is currently done at query-processing time, which has a direct effect on the response time of search systems. Previous research also shows that an alternative to improve search efficiency in textual databases is to precompute term impacts at indexing time. In this article, we propose a novel alternative to precompute term impacts, providing a generic framework for combining any distinct set of sources of evidence by using a machine-learning technique. This method retains the advantages of producing high-quality results, but avoids the costs of combining evidence at query-processing time. Our method, called Learn to Precompute Evidence Fusion (LePrEF), uses genetic programming to compute a unified precomputed impact value for each term found in each document prior to query processing, at indexing time. Compared with previous research on precomputing term impacts, our method offers the advantage of providing a generic framework to precompute impact using any set of relevance evidence at any text collection, whereas previous research articles do not. The precomputed impact values are indexed and used later for computing document ranking at query-processing time. By doing so, our method effectively reduces the query processing to simple additions of such impacts. We show that this approach, while leading to results comparable to state-of-the-art ranking methods, also can lead to a significant decrease in computational costs during query processing.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1383-1397
- Type
- a
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.02
0.021891166 = product of:
0.054727912 = sum of:
0.009752372 = weight(_text_:a in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009752372 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.044975538 = product of:
0.089951076 = sum of:
0.089951076 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089951076 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
- Type
- a
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.02
0.020568617 = product of:
0.05142154 = sum of:
0.012067947 = weight(_text_:a in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012067947 = score(doc=2134,freq=4.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.039353594 = product of:
0.07870719 = sum of:
0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07870719 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Type
- a
-
Bilal, D.: Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries : evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids (2012)
0.02
0.019285569 = product of:
0.04821392 = sum of:
0.0042229015 = weight(_text_:a in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042229015 = score(doc=393,freq=6.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.043991018 = weight(_text_:63 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043991018 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.21645561 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This study employed benchmarking and intellectual relevance judgment in evaluating Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and Ask Kids on 30 queries that children formulated to find information for specific tasks. Retrieved hits on given queries were benchmarked to Google's and Yahoo! Kids' top-five ranked hits retrieved. Relevancy of hits was judged on a graded scale; precision was calculated using the precision-at-ten metric (P@10). Yahoo! and Bing produced a similar percentage in hit overlap with Google (nearly 30%), but differed in the ranking of hits. Ask Kids retrieved 11% in hit overlap with Google versus 3% by Yahoo! Kids. The engines retrieved 26 hits across query clusters that overlapped with Yahoo! Kids' top-five ranked hits. Precision (P) that the engines produced across the queries was P = 0.48 for relevant hits, and P = 0.28 for partially relevant hits. Precision by Ask Kids was P = 0.44 for relevant hits versus P = 0.21 by Yahoo! Kids. Bing produced the highest total precision (TP) of relevant hits (TP = 0.86) across the queries, and Yahoo! Kids yielded the lowest (TP = 0.47). Average precision (AP) of relevant hits was AP = 0.56 by leading engines versus AP = 0.29 by small engines. In contrast, average precision of partially relevant hits was AP = 0.83 by small engines versus AP = 0.33 by leading engines. Average precision of relevant hits across the engines was highest on two-word queries and lowest on one-word queries. Google performed best on natural language queries; Bing did the same (P = 0.69) on two-word queries. The findings have implications for search engine ranking algorithms, relevance theory, search engine design, research design, and information literacy.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1879-1896
- Type
- a
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.02
0.019154768 = product of:
0.04788692 = sum of:
0.008533326 = weight(_text_:a in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008533326 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.039353594 = product of:
0.07870719 = sum of:
0.07870719 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07870719 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
- Type
- a
-
Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (2005)
0.02
0.018571645 = product of:
0.046429113 = sum of:
0.002438093 = weight(_text_:a in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002438093 = score(doc=7,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
0.043991018 = weight(_text_:63 in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043991018 = score(doc=7,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.21645561 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The second edition of Understanding Search Engines: Mathematical Modeling and Text Retrieval follows the basic premise of the first edition by discussing many of the key design issues for building search engines and emphasizing the important role that applied mathematics can play in improving information retrieval. The authors discuss important data structures, algorithms, and software as well as user-centered issues such as interfaces, manual indexing, and document preparation. Significant changes bring the text up to date on current information retrieval methods: for example the addition of a new chapter on link-structure algorithms used in search engines such as Google. The chapter on user interface has been rewritten to specifically focus on search engine usability. In addition the authors have added new recommendations for further reading and expanded the bibliography, and have updated and streamlined the index to make it more reader friendly.
- Signature
- 63 TWP 591 (2)
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.016418373 = product of:
0.04104593 = sum of:
0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073142797 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.03373165 = product of:
0.0674633 = sum of:
0.0674633 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0674633 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
- Type
- a
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.016418373 = product of:
0.04104593 = sum of:
0.0073142797 = weight(_text_:a in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073142797 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.03373165 = product of:
0.0674633 = sum of:
0.0674633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0674633 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
- Type
- a
-
Langville, A.N.; Meyer, C.D.: Google's PageRank and beyond : the science of search engine rankings (2006)
0.01
0.014660162 = product of:
0.036650404 = sum of:
0.0036571398 = weight(_text_:a in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0036571398 = score(doc=6,freq=8.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.032993264 = weight(_text_:63 in 6) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032993264 = score(doc=6,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20323344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.16234171 = fieldWeight in 6, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8978314 = idf(docFreq=896, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Inhalt: Chapter 1. Introduction to Web Search Engines: 1.1 A Short History of Information Retrieval - 1.2 An Overview of Traditional Information Retrieval - 1.3 Web Information Retrieval Chapter 2. Crawling, Indexing, and Query Processing: 2.1 Crawling - 2.2 The Content Index - 2.3 Query Processing Chapter 3. Ranking Webpages by Popularity: 3.1 The Scene in 1998 - 3.2 Two Theses - 3.3 Query-Independence Chapter 4. The Mathematics of Google's PageRank: 4.1 The Original Summation Formula for PageRank - 4.2 Matrix Representation of the Summation Equations - 4.3 Problems with the Iterative Process - 4.4 A Little Markov Chain Theory - 4.5 Early Adjustments to the Basic Model - 4.6 Computation of the PageRank Vector - 4.7 Theorem and Proof for Spectrum of the Google Matrix Chapter 5. Parameters in the PageRank Model: 5.1 The a Factor - 5.2 The Hyperlink Matrix H - 5.3 The Teleportation Matrix E Chapter 6. The Sensitivity of PageRank; 6.1 Sensitivity with respect to alpha - 6.2 Sensitivity with respect to H - 6.3 Sensitivity with respect to vT - 6.4 Other Analyses of Sensitivity - 6.5 Sensitivity Theorems and Proofs Chapter 7. The PageRank Problem as a Linear System: 7.1 Properties of (I - alphaS) - 7.2 Properties of (I - alphaH) - 7.3 Proof of the PageRank Sparse Linear System Chapter 8. Issues in Large-Scale Implementation of PageRank: 8.1 Storage Issues - 8.2 Convergence Criterion - 8.3 Accuracy - 8.4 Dangling Nodes - 8.5 Back Button Modeling
- Signature
- 63 TWD 106
-
Losada, D.E.; Barreiro, A.: Emebedding term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval (2003)
0.01
0.013356501 = product of:
0.033391252 = sum of:
0.010903485 = weight(_text_:a in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010903485 = score(doc=1422,freq=10.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 1422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=1422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We propose a novel approach to incorporate term similarity and inverse document frequency into a logical model of information retrieval. The ability of the logic to handle expressive representations along with the use of such classical notions are promising characteristics for IR systems. The approach proposed here has been efficiently implemented and experiments against test collections are presented.
- Date
- 22. 3.2003 19:27:23
- Type
- a
-
Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992)
0.01
0.012896056 = product of:
0.03224014 = sum of:
0.009752372 = weight(_text_:a in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009752372 = score(doc=3499,freq=8.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a survey and discussion on signature-based text retrieval methods. It describes the main idea behind the signature approach and its advantages over other text retrieval methods, it provides a classification of the signature methods that have appeared in the literature, it describes the main representatives of each class, together with the relative advantages and drawbacks, and it gives a list of applications as well as commercial or university prototypes that use the signature approach
- Date
- 7. 5.1999 15:22:48
- Type
- a
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.012896056 = product of:
0.03224014 = sum of:
0.009752372 = weight(_text_:a in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009752372 = score(doc=1431,freq=8.0), product of:
0.047845192 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.022487769 = product of:
0.044975538 = sum of:
0.044975538 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044975538 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14530693 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041494574 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Properties of a percentile-based rating scale needed in bibliometrics are formulated. Based on these properties, P100 was recently introduced as a new citation-rank approach (Bornmann, Leydesdorff, & Wang, 2013). In this paper, we conceptualize P100 and propose an improvement which we call P100'. Advantages and disadvantages of citation-rank indicators are noted.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Type
- a
