Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Carlyle, A.: Exploring bibliographic classification in new environments (1997) 0.03 
    0.028919721 = product of:
  0.1445986 = sum of:
    0.1445986 = weight(_text_:91 in 6184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1445986 = score(doc=6184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.7387768 = fieldWeight in 6184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6184)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.90-91
  2. Classification research for knowledge representation and organization : Proc. of the 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991 (1992) 0.02 
    0.022727055 = product of:
  0.056817636 = sum of:
    0.020667985 = weight(_text_:b in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020667985 = score(doc=2072,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.16607635 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
    0.03614965 = weight(_text_:91 in 2072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03614965 = score(doc=2072,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.1846942 = fieldWeight in 2072, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2072)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This volume deals with both theoretical and empirical research in classification and encompasses universal classification systems, special classification systems, thesauri and the place of classification in a broad spectrum of document and information systems. Papers fall into one or three major areas as follows: 1) general principles and policies 2) structure and logic in classification; and empirical investigation; classification in the design of various types of document/information systems. The papers originate from the ISCCR '91 conference and have been selected according to the following criteria: relevance to the conference theme; importance of the topic in the representation and organization of knowledge; quality; and originality in terms of potential contribution to research and new knowledge.
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SVENONIUS, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities; BEALL, J.: Editing the Dewey Decimal Classification online: the evolution of the DDC database; BEGHTOL, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: Concept relation structures and their graphic display; FUGMANN, R.: Illusory goals in information science research; GILCHRIST, A.: UDC: the 1990's and beyond; GREEN, R.: The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing: are frame-based index languages the answer?; HUMPHREY, S.M.: Use and management of classification systems for knowledge-based indexing; MIKSA, F.L.: The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification; SCOTT, M. u. A.F. FONSECA: Methodology for functional appraisal of records and creation of a functional thesaurus; ALBRECHTSEN, H.: PRESS: a thesaurus-based information system for software reuse; AMAESHI, B.: A preliminary AAT compatible African art thesaurus; CHATTERJEE, A.: Structures of Indian classification systems of the pre-Ranganathan era and their impact on the Colon Classification; COCHRANE, P.A.: Indexing and searching thesauri, the Janus or Proteus of information retrieval; CRAVEN, T.C.: A general versus a special algorithm in the graphic display of thesauri; DAHLBERG, I.: The basis of a new universal classification system seen from a philosophy of science point of view: DRABENSTOTT, K.M., RIESTER, L.C. u. B.A.DEDE: Shelflisting using expert systems; FIDEL, R.: Thesaurus requirements for an intermediary expert system; GREEN, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences: ramifications for index languages; GROLIER, E. de: Towards a syndetic information retrieval system; GUENTHER, R.: The USMARC format for classification data: development and implementation; HOWARTH, L.C.: Factors influencing policies for the adoption and integration of revisions to classification schedules; HUDON, M.: Term definitions in subject thesauri: the Canadian literacy thesaurus experience; HUSAIN, S.: Notational techniques for the accomodation of subjects in Colon Classification 7th edition: theoretical possibility vis-à-vis practical need; KWASNIK, B.H. u. C. JORGERSEN: The exploration by means of repertory grids of semantic differences among names of official documents; MICCO, M.: Suggestions for automating the Library of Congress Classification schedules; PERREAULT, J.M.: An essay on the prehistory of general categories (II): G.W. Leibniz, Conrad Gesner; REES-POTTER, L.K.: How well do thesauri serve the social sciences?; REVIE, C.W. u. G. SMART: The construction and the use of faceted classification schema in technical domains; ROCKMORE, M.: Structuring a flexible faceted thsaurus record for corporate information retrieval; ROULIN, C.: Sub-thesauri as part of a metathesaurus; SMITH, L.C.: UNISIST revisited: compatibility in the context of collaboratories; STILES, W.G.: Notes concerning the use chain indexing as a possible means of simulating the inductive leap within artificial intelligence; SVENONIUS, E., LIU, S. u. B. SUBRAHMANYAM: Automation in chain indexing; TURNER, J.: Structure in data in the Stockshot database at the National Film Board of Canada; VIZINE-GOETZ, D.: The Dewey Decimal Classification as an online classification tool; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: Restructuring UDC: problems and possibilies; WILSON, A.: The hierarchy of belief: ideological tendentiousness in universal classification; WILSON, B.F.: An evaluation of the systematic botany schedule of the Universal Decimal Classification (English full edition, 1979); ZENG, L.: Research and development of classification and thesauri in China; CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
  3. Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005) 0.02 
    0.01975485 = product of:
  0.049387123 = sum of:
    0.042174593 = weight(_text_:91 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042174593 = score(doc=4406,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.21547656 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
    0.0072125294 = product of:
      0.028850118 = sum of:
        0.028850118 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028850118 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1230039 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03512561 = queryNorm
            0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
    Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 58(2005) H.3, S.89-91
  4. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.02 
    0.019395998 = product of:
  0.048489995 = sum of:
    0.038971927 = weight(_text_:b in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038971927 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
    0.00951807 = product of:
      0.03807228 = sum of:
        0.03807228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03807228 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1230039 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03512561 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  5. Walker, S.: Views on classification as a search tool on a computer (1991) 0.02 
    0.016869837 = product of:
  0.084349185 = sum of:
    0.084349185 = weight(_text_:91 in 4837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084349185 = score(doc=4837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.43095312 = fieldWeight in 4837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4837)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computers in libraries international 91. Proc. of the 5th Annual Conference on Computers in Libraries, London, February 1991
  6. Brandhorst, H.; Huisstede, P.V.: ICONCLASS in de computer : de classificatie van beeldmateriaal in een geautomatiseerde omgeving (1992) 0.02 
    0.016869837 = product of:
  0.084349185 = sum of:
    0.084349185 = weight(_text_:91 in 6486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084349185 = score(doc=6486,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.43095312 = fieldWeight in 6486, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6486)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Contribution to thematic issue of art libraries in the Netherlands. Visual images are now widely recognised as an importatnt resource for the historical research. To improve access to collections of such material H. van de Wal developed ICONCLASS in the Netherlands. With some 150.000 controlled indexing terms the scheme is hierarchical and easy to use. In response to requests a version of ICONCLASS has been developed for use in automated systems. The scheme has been used by the Dutch Royal Library for its database of printers' devices, published in CD-ROM version in Dec. 91. Experience with the project shows the need for careful preparations and the use of trained staff
  7. McAllister-Harper, D.: Dewey Decimal Classification in the online environment : a study of libraries in North Carolina (1990) 0.02 
    0.016869837 = product of:
  0.084349185 = sum of:
    0.084349185 = weight(_text_:91 in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084349185 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.43095312 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3574)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Results of a survey of North Carolina Libraries revealed that of 91 respondents, 29 had on-line catalogues. Of the libraries with on-line catalogues, 11 used the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Survey findings indicate that the DDC has limited use in on-line searching today.
  8. Hanke, M.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme im semantischen Web : zu Chancen und Problemen von Linked-data-Repräsentationen ausgewählter Klassifikationssysteme (2014) 0.01 
    0.0144598605 = product of:
  0.0722993 = sum of:
    0.0722993 = weight(_text_:91 in 2463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0722993 = score(doc=2463,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19572705 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.3693884 = fieldWeight in 2463, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2463)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Perspektive Bibliothek. 3(2014) H.2, S.91-119
  9. Rosenberger, B.: ¬Die neue Online-Systematik der Universitätsbibliothek Hagen (2000) 0.01 
    0.013640175 = product of:
  0.06820087 = sum of:
    0.06820087 = weight(_text_:b in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06820087 = score(doc=4354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.01 
    0.013640175 = product of:
  0.06820087 = sum of:
    0.06820087 = weight(_text_:b in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06820087 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Lischewsky-Weiser, B.: ¬Die Systematik im OPAC (1992) 0.01 
    0.011691578 = product of:
  0.05845789 = sum of:
    0.05845789 = weight(_text_:b in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05845789 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. ¬Die Systematik im OPAC : über das Instrumentarium zum Ordnen und Wiederfinden. Vorträge aus den bibliothekarischen Arbeitsgruppen der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Dortmund 1992 (1993) 0.01 
    0.010125204 = product of:
  0.05062602 = sum of:
    0.05062602 = weight(_text_:b in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05062602 = score(doc=8,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: LISCHEWSKY-WEISER, B.: Die Systematik im OPAC; GREINER, G.: Facettensysteme; LORENZ, B.: Überlegungen zur Aufstellungsklassifikation; HERMES, H.-J.: Dezimalklassifikation: zum gegenwärtigen Stand der UDK; TRAISER, W.: Die Deutsche Bibliothek: Schlagwort-Klassifikation und Conspectus; BIES, W.: Inhaltserschließung: Versuch einer bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Didaktik; RECKER-KOTULLA, I.: Die niederländische Basisklassifikation als Instrument der kooperativen Sacherschließung; JEDWABSKI, B. u. K. SCHRÖDER: UBOK: Der Dortmunder Universitätsbibliotheks-Online-Katalog; KOWALK, W.: Der Saarbrücker Sachkatalog nach der Methode Eppelsheimer im OPAC; NOHR, H.: Präkombination klassifikatorischer und verbaler Sacherschließungsdaten und ihr Potential im Information Retrieval
  13. Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998) 0.01 
    0.009742982 = product of:
  0.04871491 = sum of:
    0.04871491 = weight(_text_:b in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04871491 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.008437671 = product of:
  0.042188354 = sum of:
    0.042188354 = weight(_text_:b in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042188354 = score(doc=2478,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  15. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.01 
    0.008437671 = product of:
  0.042188354 = sum of:
    0.042188354 = weight(_text_:b in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042188354 = score(doc=2480,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  16. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A concept-map thesaurus as a knowledge-based hypertext interface to a bibliographic database (1990) 0.01 
    0.008437671 = product of:
  0.042188354 = sum of:
    0.042188354 = weight(_text_:b in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042188354 = score(doc=2481,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  17. Slavic, A.; Turkulin, B.: Prevajanje klasifikacijskih oznak v naravni jezik (1998) 0.01 
    0.0068200873 = product of:
  0.034100436 = sum of:
    0.034100436 = weight(_text_:b in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034100436 = score(doc=3229,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. ¬The UDC : Essays for a new decade (1990) 0.01 
    0.0068200873 = product of:
  0.034100436 = sum of:
    0.034100436 = weight(_text_:b in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034100436 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: STRACHAN, P.D.: UDC revision work in FID; SCIBOR, E. u. I.S. SHCHERBINA-SAMOJLOVA: A strategic approach to to revising the UDC; MCILWAINE, I.: The work of the system development task force; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The UDC: its future; HAARALA, A.-R.: FID pre-conference seminar on computer applications of the UDC; LOTH, K. u. H. FUNK: Subject search on ETHICS on the basis of the UDC; KURHULA, P.: Use and usability of the UDC in classification practice and online retrieval; RINNE, B.: HELECON system: economics databases; NAKAMURA, Y. u. T. ISHIKAWA: Expert systems for automatic UDC number assignment; RIESTHUIS, G.J.A. u. S. BLIEDUNG: Thesaurification of UDC: preliminary report
  19. Gödert, W.: Facettenklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1992) 0.01 
    0.0068200873 = product of:
  0.034100436 = sum of:
    0.034100436 = weight(_text_:b in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034100436 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.
  20. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.01 
    0.005845789 = product of:
  0.029228944 = sum of:
    0.029228944 = weight(_text_:b in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029228944 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1244487 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03512561 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 14
  • nl 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 39
  • s 6
  • el 4
  • m 4
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications