Search (384 results, page 1 of 20)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.32 
    0.32003808 = product of:
  0.5333968 = sum of:
    0.11476496 = product of:
      0.34429488 = sum of:
        0.34429488 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34429488 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3675628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.07433694 = weight(_text_:t in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07433694 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.34429488 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34429488 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3675628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.16 
    0.16001904 = product of:
  0.2666984 = sum of:
    0.05738248 = product of:
      0.17214744 = sum of:
        0.17214744 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17214744 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3675628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.03716847 = weight(_text_:t in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03716847 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.17214744 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17214744 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3675628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  3. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.15 
    0.14689915 = product of:
  0.36724788 = sum of:
    0.09181197 = product of:
      0.2754359 = sum of:
        0.2754359 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2754359 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3675628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2754359 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2754359 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3675628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  4. Koch, T.: Searching the Web : systematic overview over indexes (1995) 0.06 
    0.057633515 = product of:
  0.14408378 = sum of:
    0.089204326 = weight(_text_:t in 3169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089204326 = score(doc=3169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 3169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3169)
    0.054879453 = product of:
      0.109758906 = sum of:
        0.109758906 = weight(_text_:index in 3169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109758906 = score(doc=3169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 3169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Object
    Nordic Web Index
  5. Lindholm, J.; Schönthal, T.; Jansson , K.: Experiences of harvesting Web resources in engineering using automatic classification (2003) 0.04 
    0.04448416 = product of:
  0.1112104 = sum of:
    0.05946955 = weight(_text_:t in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05946955 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
    0.051740848 = product of:
      0.103481695 = sum of:
        0.103481695 = weight(_text_:index in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103481695 = score(doc=4088,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Authors describe the background and the work involved in setting up Engine-e, a Web index that uses automatic classification as a mean for the selection of resources in Engineering. Considerations in offering a robot-generated Web index as a successor to a manually indexed quality-controlled subject gateway are also discussed
  6. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.03 
    0.03119368 = product of:
  0.1559684 = sum of:
    0.1559684 = sum of:
      0.06402603 = weight(_text_:index in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06402603 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.09194236 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09194236 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  7. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.03 
    0.029037917 = product of:
  0.07259479 = sum of:
    0.052035857 = weight(_text_:t in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052035857 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
    0.020558937 = product of:
      0.041117873 = sum of:
        0.041117873 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041117873 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  8. Pany, T.: Konfusion in der Medienrepublik : Der Überraschungseffekt der Youtuber (2019) 0.03 
    0.029037917 = product of:
  0.07259479 = sum of:
    0.052035857 = weight(_text_:t in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052035857 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
    0.020558937 = product of:
      0.041117873 = sum of:
        0.041117873 = weight(_text_:22 in 5244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041117873 = score(doc=5244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Dörner, S.:"CDU-Zerstörer" Rezo: Es kamen "Diskreditierung, Lügen, Trump-Wordings und keine inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung" [22. Mai 2019]. Interview mit Rezo. Unter: https://www.heise.de/tp/features/CDU-Zerstoerer-Rezo-Es-kamen-Diskreditierung-Luegen-Trump-Wordings-und-keine-inhaltliche-4428522.html?view=print [http://www.heise.de/-4428522].
  9. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.03 
    0.029037917 = product of:
  0.07259479 = sum of:
    0.052035857 = weight(_text_:t in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052035857 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
    0.020558937 = product of:
      0.041117873 = sum of:
        0.041117873 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041117873 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  10. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.; Noodén, L.: ¬The construction of a robot-generated subject index : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 1 (1999) 0.03 
    0.028816758 = product of:
  0.07204189 = sum of:
    0.044602163 = weight(_text_:t in 1668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044602163 = score(doc=1668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1668)
    0.027439727 = product of:
      0.054879453 = sum of:
        0.054879453 = weight(_text_:index in 1668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054879453 = score(doc=1668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 1668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  11. Balakrishnan, U.; Krausz, A,; Voss, J.: Cocoda - ein Konkordanztool für bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme (2015) 0.03 
    0.0278026 = product of:
  0.069506496 = sum of:
    0.03716847 = weight(_text_:t in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03716847 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
    0.03233803 = product of:
      0.06467606 = sum of:
        0.06467606 = weight(_text_:index in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06467606 = score(doc=2030,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Cocoda (Colibri Concordance Database for library classification systems) ist ein semi-automatisches, webbasiertes Tool für die Erstellung und Verwaltung von Konkordanzen zwischen bibliothekarischen Klassifikationssystemen. Das Tool wird im Rahmen des Teilprojektes "coli-conc" (Colibri-Konkordanzerstellung) des VZG-Projektes Colibri/DDC als eine Open-Source-Software an der Verbundzentrale des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (VZG) entwickelt. Im Fokus des Projektes "coli-conc" steht zunächst die Konkordanzbildung zwischen der Dewey Dezimal Klassifikation (DDC) und der Regensburger Verbundklassifikation (RVK). Die inhärenten strukturellen und kulturellen Unterschiede von solch fein gegliederten bibliothekarischen Klassifikationssystemen machen den Konkordanzerstellungsprozess bei rein intellektuellem Ansatz aufwendig und zeitraubend. Um diesen zu vereinfachen und zu beschleunigen, werden die intellektuellen Schritte, die im Teilprojekt "coli-conc" eingesetzt werden, z. T. vom Konkordanztool "Cocoda" automatisch durchgeführt. Die von Cocoda erzeugten Konkordanz-Vorschläge stammen sowohl aus der automatischen Analyse der vergebenen Notationen in den Titeldatensätzen verschiedener Datenbanken als auch aus der vergleichenden Analyse der Begriffswelt der Klassifikationssysteme. Ferner soll "Cocoda" als eine Plattform für die Speicherung, Bereitstellung und Analyse von Konkordanzen dienen, um die Nutzungseffizienz der Konkordanzen zu erhöhen. In dieser Präsentation wird zuerst das Konkordanzprojekt "coli-conc", das die Basis des Konkordanztools "Cocoda" bildet, vorgestellt. Danach werden Algorithmus, Benutzeroberfläche und technische Details des Tools dargelegt. Anhand von Beispielen wird der Konkordanzerstellungsprozess mit Cocoda demonstriert.
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1676
  12. Boldi, P.; Santini, M.; Vigna, S.: PageRank as a function of the damping factor (2005) 0.03 
    0.026899641 = product of:
  0.067249104 = sum of:
    0.05256415 = weight(_text_:t in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05256415 = score(doc=2564,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
    0.014684956 = product of:
      0.029369911 = sum of:
        0.029369911 = weight(_text_:22 in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029369911 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    PageRank is defined as the stationary state of a Markov chain. The chain is obtained by perturbing the transition matrix induced by a web graph with a damping factor alpha that spreads uniformly part of the rank. The choice of alpha is eminently empirical, and in most cases the original suggestion alpha=0.85 by Brin and Page is still used. Recently, however, the behaviour of PageRank with respect to changes in alpha was discovered to be useful in link-spam detection. Moreover, an analytical justification of the value chosen for alpha is still missing. In this paper, we give the first mathematical analysis of PageRank when alpha changes. In particular, we show that, contrarily to popular belief, for real-world graphs values of alpha close to 1 do not give a more meaningful ranking. Then, we give closed-form formulae for PageRank derivatives of any order, and an extension of the Power Method that approximates them with convergence O(t**k*alpha**t) for the k-th derivative. Finally, we show a tight connection between iterated computation and analytical behaviour by proving that the k-th iteration of the Power Method gives exactly the PageRank value obtained using a Maclaurin polynomial of degree k. The latter result paves the way towards the application of analytical methods to the study of PageRank.
    Date
    16. 1.2016 10:22:28
  13. Stumpf, G.: "Kerngeschäft" Sacherschließung in neuer Sicht : was gezielte intellektuelle Arbeit und maschinelle Verfahren gemeinsam bewirken können (2015) 0.03 
    0.02633287 = product of:
  0.13166435 = sum of:
    0.13166435 = sum of:
      0.09054648 = weight(_text_:index in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09054648 = score(doc=1703,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
      0.041117873 = weight(_text_:22 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041117873 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Es handelt sich um den leicht überarbeiteten Text eines Vortrags bei der VDB-Fortbildungsveranstaltung "Wandel als Konstante: neue Aufgaben und Herausforderungen für sozialwissenschaftliche Bibliotheken" am 22./23. Januar 2015 in Berlin.
    Source
    https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/frontdoor/index/index/docId/3002
  14. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.02 
    0.024889644 = product of:
  0.06222411 = sum of:
    0.044602163 = weight(_text_:t in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044602163 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
    0.017621946 = product of:
      0.03524389 = sum of:
        0.03524389 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03524389 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  15. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.02 
    0.024889644 = product of:
  0.06222411 = sum of:
    0.044602163 = weight(_text_:t in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044602163 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
    0.017621946 = product of:
      0.03524389 = sum of:
        0.03524389 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03524389 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  16. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.02 
    0.02413779 = product of:
  0.060344473 = sum of:
    0.042051323 = weight(_text_:t in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042051323 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.24621303 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
    0.018293152 = product of:
      0.036586303 = sum of:
        0.036586303 = weight(_text_:index in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036586303 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.1931181 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
  17. Dousa, T.: Everything Old is New Again : Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser's Theory of Systematic Indexing (2007) 0.02 
    0.024013964 = product of:
  0.06003491 = sum of:
    0.03716847 = weight(_text_:t in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03716847 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
    0.02286644 = product of:
      0.04573288 = sum of:
        0.04573288 = weight(_text_:index in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04573288 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method-its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories "concretes", "countries", and "processes", which are then to be synthesized into indexing "statements" formulated according to strict rules of citation order-have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser's perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.
  18. Wattenberg, M.; Viégas, F.; Johnson, I.: How to use t-SNE effectively (2016) 0.02 
    0.02378782 = product of:
  0.1189391 = sum of:
    0.1189391 = weight(_text_:t in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1189391 = score(doc=3887,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.69639564 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Although extremely useful for visualizing high-dimensional data, t-SNE plots can sometimes be mysterious or misleading. By exploring how it behaves in simple cases, we can learn to use it more effectively. We'll walk through a series of simple examples to illustrate what t-SNE diagrams can and cannot show. The t-SNE technique really is useful-but only if you know how to interpret it.
  19. Maaten, L. van den: Accelerating t-SNE using Tree-Based Algorithms (2014) 0.02 
    0.023271142 = product of:
  0.11635571 = sum of:
    0.11635571 = weight(_text_:t in 3886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11635571 = score(doc=3886,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.17079243 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04335484 = queryNorm
        0.6812697 = fieldWeight in 3886, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3886)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper investigates the acceleration of t-SNE-an embedding technique that is commonly used for the visualization of high-dimensional data in scatter plots-using two tree-based algorithms. In particular, the paper develops variants of the Barnes-Hut algorithm and of the dual-tree algorithm that approximate the gradient used for learning t-SNE embeddings in O(N*logN). Our experiments show that the resulting algorithms substantially accelerate t-SNE, and that they make it possible to learn embeddings of data sets with millions of objects. Somewhat counterintuitively, the Barnes-Hut variant of t-SNE appears to outperform the dual-tree variant.
  20. Knoll, A.: Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen (2016) 0.02 
    0.022571033 = product of:
  0.11285516 = sum of:
    0.11285516 = sum of:
      0.07761127 = weight(_text_:index in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07761127 = score(doc=3069,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.03524389 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03524389 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15182126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04335484 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://yis.univie.ac.at/index.php/yis/article/view/1324/1234. Diesem Beitrag liegt folgende Abschlussarbeit zugrunde: Lamparter, Anna: Kompetenzprofil für Information Professionals in Unternehmen. Masterarbeit (M.A.), Hochschule Hannover, 2015. Volltext: https://serwiss.bib.hs-hannover.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/528 Vgl. auch: (geb. Lamparter): Kompetenzprofil von Information Professionals in Unternehmen. In:
    Date
    28. 7.2016 16:22:54

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 218
  • d 157
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 186
  • i 15
  • s 11
  • m 7
  • r 7
  • x 5
  • b 4
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications