Search (76 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Joyce, T.; Needham, R.M.: ¬The thesaurus approach to information retrieval (1958) 0.03 
    0.031084161 = product of:
  0.09325248 = sum of:
    0.07321297 = weight(_text_:t in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07321297 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
    0.02003951 = product of:
      0.06011853 = sum of:
        0.06011853 = weight(_text_:k in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06011853 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgang Kaufmann 1997. S.15-20.
  2. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.02 
    0.02274747 = product of:
  0.13648482 = sum of:
    0.13648482 = sum of:
      0.10755898 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10755898 = score(doc=3197,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20204939 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
            0.035582762 = queryNorm
          0.53234005 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.028925838 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028925838 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.035582762 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    BK
    54.72 (Künstliche Intelligenz)
    Classification
    54.72 (Künstliche Intelligenz)
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
  3. Lee, W.G.; Ishikawa, Y.; Yamagishi, T.; Nishioka, A.; Hatada, K.; Ohbo, N.; Fujiwara, S.: ¬A dynamic thesaurus for intelligent access to research databases (1989) 0.02 
    0.018132426 = product of:
  0.054397278 = sum of:
    0.042707562 = weight(_text_:t in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042707562 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
    0.011689715 = product of:
      0.035069145 = sum of:
        0.035069145 = weight(_text_:k in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035069145 = score(doc=3556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
  4. Compatibility and integration of order systems : Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995 (1996) 0.02 
    0.01716365 = product of:
  0.051490948 = sum of:
    0.043141153 = weight(_text_:t in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043141153 = score(doc=6050,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
    0.008349796 = product of:
      0.025049387 = sum of:
        0.025049387 = weight(_text_:k in 6050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025049387 = score(doc=6050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12702256 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 6050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6050)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility; RIESTHUIS, G.: Theory of compatibility of information languages; DAHLBERG, I.: The compatibility guidelines - a re-evaluation; SOERGEL, D.: Data structure and software support for integrated thesauri; MURASZKIEWICZ, M., H. RYBINSKI u. W. STRUK: Software problems of merging multilingual thesauri; CHMIELEWSKA-GORCZYCA, E.: Compatibility of indexing tools in multidatabase environment; NEGRINI, G.: Towards structural compatibility between concept systems; SCIBOR, E.: Some remarks on the establishment of concordances between a universal classification system and an interdisciplinary thesaurus; HOPPE, S.: The UMLS - a model for knowledge integration in a subject field; DEXTRE-CLARKE, S.: Integrating thesauri in the agricultural sciences; ROULIN, C.: Bringing multilingual thesauri together: a feasibility study; ZIMMERMANN, H.: Conception and application possibilities of classification concordances in an OPAC environment; SOSINSKA-KALATA, B.: The Universal Decimal Classification as an international standard for knowledge organization in bibliographic databases and library catalogues; WOZNIAK, J. u. T. GLOWACKA: KABA Subject Authority File - an example of an integrated Polish-French-English subject headings system; BABIK, W.: Terminology as a level for the compatibility of indexing languages - some remarks; STANCIKOVA, P.: International integrated database systems linked to multilingual thesauri covering the field of environment and agriculture; SAMEK, T.: Indexing languages integration and the EUROVOC Thesaurus in the Czech Republic; SIWEK, K.: Compatibility discrepancies between Polish and foreign databases; GLINSKI, W. u. M. MURASZKIEWICZ: An intelligent front-end processor for accessing information systems
  5. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.01 
    0.0141859455 = product of:
  0.042557836 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
    0.012052433 = product of:
      0.024104865 = sum of:
        0.024104865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024104865 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
  6. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.01 
    0.012328612 = product of:
  0.07397167 = sum of:
    0.07397167 = weight(_text_:t in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07397167 = score(doc=604,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.52770925 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  7. Shiri, A.; Chambers, T.: Information retrieval from digital libraries : assessing the potential utility of thesauri in supporting users' search behaviour in an interdisciplinary domain (2008) 0.01 
    0.0086282315 = product of:
  0.051769387 = sum of:
    0.051769387 = weight(_text_:t in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051769387 = score(doc=2263,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.36931956 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  8. Viegener, J.; Maurer, A.: ¬Ein Ansatz zur Dynamisierung von Thesauri in Informationssystemen (1993) 0.01 
    0.008450632 = product of:
  0.05070379 = sum of:
    0.05070379 = product of:
      0.10140758 = sum of:
        0.10140758 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 5590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10140758 = score(doc=5590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20204939 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.501895 = fieldWeight in 5590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Im folgenden wird ein Ansatz für die Verbesserung von dokumentbasierten Informationssystemen unter Verwendung von Methoden der Künstlichen Intelligenz vorgestellt. Dabei wird ein dynamischer Thesaurus verwendet, der speziell an den jeweiligen Dokumentenbestand angepaßt ist. Erzeugung und Pflege dieses Thesaurus werden (teil-) automatisiert durch eine Wissensakquisitionskomponente durchgeführt; dies geschieht unter Ausnutzung von Benutzerwissen und durch Analyse des Dokumentenbestandes. Hierzu ist ein erweiterter Thesaurusbegriff notwendig, bei dem dieser als Wissensrepräsentationsstruktur gesehen wird. Die Verwendung einer graphischen Oberfläche (GUI) macht den Thesaurus dem Benutzer direkt zugänglich
  9. Wolters, C.: GOS Thesaurus-Handbuch : zum Projekt: Sammlungsmanagement für kulturgeschichtliche Museen in den neuen Bundesländern (1997) 0.01 
    0.007190192 = product of:
  0.043141153 = sum of:
    0.043141153 = weight(_text_:t in 4009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043141153 = score(doc=4009,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.3077663 = fieldWeight in 4009, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4009)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Das GOS Thesaurus-Handbuch wurde für die Teilnehmer an dem von der ROBERTBOSCH-STIFTUNG geförderten Projekt "Sammlungsmanagement für kulturgeschichtliche Museen in den neuen Bundesländern" (Spitzname: "Knorr-Projekt") geschrieben. Es basiert auf den bereits Mitte der 80er Jahre vom Institut für Museumskunde in Zusammenarbeit mit dem heutigen Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB) durchgeführten und 1988 publizierten Arbeiten im Projekt "Kleine Museen".' Schon damals war zu erkennen, daß die international gültige Thesaurusnorm auch in den Museen auf dem Siegeszug war. Heute ist sie die Grundlage aller wichtigen Projekte zur internationalen Zusammenarbeit bei der Museumsdokumentation. GOS-Benutzer, die sich noch nie mit solchen Dingen befaßt haben, können dieses Handbuch als eine allgemeine Einführung in die Thesaurusarbeit benutzen, denn es behandelt alle Grundfunktionen eines Thesaurus nach DIN 1463. Es besteht aus einem "Lesebuch", in dem es mehr um die Zusammenhänge und etwas Hintergrundwissen geht sowie einem "Datenkatalog" mit der Beschreibung der Datenfelder des Thesaurus, gedruckt aus einer kleinen GOS-Datenbank, aus der auch die "H i l f e t e x t e " im GOS-Menü geholt werden. Wir haben uns - mit einiger Mühe allerdings - jeden Hinweis auf "gerade in Entwicklung befindliche" und "in wenigen Monaten freizugebende" Leistungen von GOS verkniffen und uns auschließlich auf Dinge beschränkt, die in den am Projekt direkt beteiligten Museen vor März 1997 routinemäßig angewendet wurden.
  10. Petersen, T.: Information on images : the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (1989) 0.01 
    0.007117927 = product of:
  0.042707562 = sum of:
    0.042707562 = weight(_text_:t in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042707562 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  11. Pastor, J.A.; Saorin, T.: ¬Un interfaz hipertexto para un sistema de gestion de tesauros (1996) 0.01 
    0.007117927 = product of:
  0.042707562 = sum of:
    0.042707562 = weight(_text_:t in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042707562 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  12. Stys, T.; Klos, J.; Kunkel, P.: Thesauri entwickeln und anwenden mit MIDOSThesaurus (2003) 0.01 
    0.007117927 = product of:
  0.042707562 = sum of:
    0.042707562 = weight(_text_:t in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042707562 = score(doc=1765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  13. Conlon, S.P.N.; Evens, M.; Ahlswede, T.: Developing a large lexical database for information retrieval, parsing, and text generation systems (1993) 0.01 
    0.0061010807 = product of:
  0.036606483 = sum of:
    0.036606483 = weight(_text_:t in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036606483 = score(doc=5813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  14. Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995) 0.01 
    0.0061010807 = product of:
  0.036606483 = sum of:
    0.036606483 = weight(_text_:t in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036606483 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  15. Shiri, A.: Powering search : the role of thesauri in new information environments (2012) 0.01 
    0.0061010807 = product of:
  0.036606483 = sum of:
    0.036606483 = weight(_text_:t in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036606483 = score(doc=1322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Series
    ASIS&T monograph series
  16. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.01 
    0.0057521537 = product of:
  0.034512922 = sum of:
    0.034512922 = weight(_text_:t in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034512922 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.24621303 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
  17. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.01 
    0.0056244684 = product of:
  0.03374681 = sum of:
    0.03374681 = product of:
      0.06749362 = sum of:
        0.06749362 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06749362 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12460477 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035582762 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  18. Chen, H.; Yim, T.; Fye, D.: Automatic thesaurus generation for an electronic community system (1995) 0.01 
    0.005084234 = product of:
  0.030505402 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  19. Wang, J.: Automatic thesaurus development : term extraction from title metadata (2006) 0.01 
    0.005084234 = product of:
  0.030505402 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The application of thesauri in networked environments is seriously hampered by the challenges of introducing new concepts and terminology into the formal controlled vocabulary, which is critical for enhancing its retrieval capability. The author describes an automated process of adding new terms to thesauri as entry vocabulary by analyzing the association between words/phrases extracted from bibliographic titles and subject descriptors in the metadata record (subject descriptors are terms assigned from controlled vocabularies of thesauri to describe the subjects of the objects [e.g., books, articles] represented by the metadata records). The investigated approach uses a corpus of metadata for scientific and technical (S&T) publications in which the titles contain substantive words for key topics. The three steps of the method are (a) extracting words and phrases from the title field of the metadata; (b) applying a method to identify and select the specific and meaningful keywords based on the associated controlled vocabulary terms from the thesaurus used to catalog the objects; and (c) inserting selected keywords into the thesaurus as new terms (most of them are in hierarchical relationships with the existing concepts), thereby updating the thesaurus with new terminology that is being used in the literature. The effectiveness of the method was demonstrated by an experiment with the Chinese Classification Thesaurus (CCT) and bibliographic data in China Machine-Readable Cataloging Record (MARC) format (CNMARC) provided by Peking University Library. This approach is equally effective in large-scale collections and in other languages.
  20. Schulz, T.: Konzeption und prototypische Entwicklung eines Thesaurus für IT-Konzepte an Hochschulen (2021) 0.01 
    0.005084234 = product of:
  0.030505402 = sum of:
    0.030505402 = weight(_text_:t in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030505402 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14017504 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035582762 = queryNorm
        0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 18
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 57
  • el 6
  • m 5
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • n 3
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications