Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.14 
    0.13562204 = product of:
  0.22603673 = sum of:
    0.05475753 = product of:
      0.16427259 = sum of:
        0.16427259 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16427259 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2922906 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16427259 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16427259 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2922906 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.0070065977 = product of:
      0.02802639 = sum of:
        0.02802639 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02802639 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.02 
    0.015960058 = product of:
  0.039900143 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
    0.0081743635 = product of:
      0.032697454 = sum of:
        0.032697454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032697454 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  3. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.02 
    0.015960058 = product of:
  0.039900143 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
    0.0081743635 = product of:
      0.032697454 = sum of:
        0.032697454 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032697454 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12073019 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034476317 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  4. Miyamoto, S.: Information clustering based an fuzzy multisets (2003) 0.01 
    0.008973407 = product of:
  0.04486703 = sum of:
    0.04486703 = weight(_text_:c in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04486703 = score(doc=1071,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3772787 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A fuzzy multiset model for information clustering is proposed with application to information retrieval on the World Wide Web. Noting that a search engine retrieves multiple occurrences of the same subjects with possibly different degrees of relevance, we observe that fuzzy multisets provide an appropriate model of information retrieval on the WWW. Information clustering which means both term clustering and document clustering is considered. Three methods of the hard c-means, fuzzy c-means, and an agglomerative method using cluster centers are proposed. Two distances between fuzzy multisets and algorithms for calculating cluster centers are defined. Theoretical properties concerning the clustering algorithms are studied. Illustrative examples are given to show how the algorithms work.
  5. Fagni, T.; Sebastiani, F.: Selecting negative examples for hierarchical text classification: An experimental comparison (2010) 0.01 
    0.007850096 = product of:
  0.03925048 = sum of:
    0.03925048 = weight(_text_:c in 4101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03925048 = score(doc=4101,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3300501 = fieldWeight in 4101, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4101)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Hierarchical text classification (HTC) approaches have recently attracted a lot of interest on the part of researchers in human language technology and machine learning, since they have been shown to bring about equal, if not better, classification accuracy with respect to their "flat" counterparts while allowing exponential time savings at both learning and classification time. A typical component of HTC methods is a "local" policy for selecting negative examples: Given a category c, its negative training examples are by default identified with the training examples that are negative for c and positive for the categories which are siblings of c in the hierarchy. However, this policy has always been taken for granted and never been subjected to careful scrutiny since first proposed 15 years ago. This article proposes a thorough experimental comparison between this policy and three other policies for the selection of negative examples in HTC contexts, one of which (BEST LOCAL (k)) is being proposed for the first time in this article. We compare these policies on the hierarchical versions of three supervised learning algorithms (boosting, support vector machines, and naïve Bayes) by performing experiments on two standard TC datasets, REUTERS-21578 and RCV1-V2.
  6. Godby, C. J.; Stuler, J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification as a knowledge base for automatic subject categorization (2001) 0.01 
    0.007251607 = product of:
  0.036258034 = sum of:
    0.036258034 = weight(_text_:c in 1567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036258034 = score(doc=1567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1567)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  7. Pfister, J.: Clustering von Patent-Dokumenten am Beispiel der Datenbanken des Fachinformationszentrums Karlsruhe (2006) 0.01 
    0.007251607 = product of:
  0.036258034 = sum of:
    0.036258034 = weight(_text_:c in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036258034 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Effektive Information Retrieval Verfahren in Theorie und Praxis: ausgewählte und erweiterte Beiträge des Vierten Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrievalworkshop (HIER 2005), Hildesheim, 20.7.2005. Hrsg.: T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  8. Na, J.-C.; Sui, H.; Khoo, C.; Chan, S.; Zhou, Y.: Effectiveness of simple linguistic processing in automatic sentiment classification of product reviews (2004) 0.01 
    0.0064095766 = product of:
  0.032047883 = sum of:
    0.032047883 = weight(_text_:c in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032047883 = score(doc=2624,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  9. Qu, B.; Cong, G.; Li, C.; Sun, A.; Chen, H.: ¬An evaluation of classification models for question topic categorization (2012) 0.01 
    0.0064095766 = product of:
  0.032047883 = sum of:
    0.032047883 = weight(_text_:c in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032047883 = score(doc=237,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    We study the problem of question topic classification using a very large real-world Community Question Answering (CQA) dataset from Yahoo! Answers. The dataset comprises 3.9 million questions and these questions are organized into more than 1,000 categories in a hierarchy. To the best knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of the performance of different classification methods on question topic classification as well as short texts. Specifically, we empirically evaluate the following in classifying questions into CQA categories: (a) the usefulness of n-gram features and bag-of-word features; (b) the performance of three standard classification algorithms (naive Bayes, maximum entropy, and support vector machines); (c) the performance of the state-of-the-art hierarchical classification algorithms; (d) the effect of training data size on performance; and (e) the effectiveness of the different components of CQA data, including subject, content, asker, and the best answer. The experimental results show what aspects are important for question topic classification in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. We believe that the experimental findings from this study will be useful in real-world classification problems.
  10. Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021) 0.01 
    0.006345156 = product of:
  0.03172578 = sum of:
    0.03172578 = weight(_text_:c in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03172578 = score(doc=724,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  11. Wu, K.J.; Chen, M.-C.; Sun, Y.: Automatic topics discovery from hyperlinked documents (2004) 0.01 
    0.0054387054 = product of:
  0.027193528 = sum of:
    0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 2563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027193528 = score(doc=2563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2563)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Hung, C.-M.; Chien, L.-F.: Web-based text classification in the absence of manually labeled training documents (2007) 0.01 
    0.0054387054 = product of:
  0.027193528 = sum of:
    0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027193528 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Montesi, M.; Navarrete, T.: Classifying web genres in context : A case study documenting the web genres used by a software engineer (2008) 0.01 
    0.0054387054 = product of:
  0.027193528 = sum of:
    0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 2100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027193528 = score(doc=2100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2100)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This case study analyzes the Internet-based resources that a software engineer uses in his daily work. Methodologically, we studied the web browser history of the participant, classifying all the web pages he had seen over a period of 12 days into web genres. We interviewed him before and after the analysis of the web browser history. In the first interview, he spoke about his general information behavior; in the second, he commented on each web genre, explaining why and how he used them. As a result, three approaches allow us to describe the set of 23 web genres obtained: (a) the purposes they serve for the participant; (b) the role they play in the various work and search phases; (c) and the way they are used in combination with each other. Further observations concern the way the participant assesses quality of web-based resources, and his information behavior as a software engineer.
  14. Sojka, P.; Lee, M.; Rehurek, R.; Hatlapatka, R.; Kucbel, M.; Bouche, T.; Goutorbe, C.; Anghelache, R.; Wojciechowski, K.: Toolset for entity and semantic associations : Final Release (2013) 0.01 
    0.0054387054 = product of:
  0.027193528 = sum of:
    0.027193528 = weight(_text_:c in 1057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027193528 = score(doc=1057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1057)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  15. Krüger, C.: Evaluation des WWW-Suchdienstes GERHARD unter besonderer Beachtung automatischer Indexierung (1999) 0.00 
    0.0045322548 = product of:
  0.022661272 = sum of:
    0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 1777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022661272 = score(doc=1777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 1777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1777)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Pong, J.Y.-H.; Kwok, R.C.-W.; Lau, R.Y.-K.; Hao, J.-X.; Wong, P.C.-C.: ¬A comparative study of two automatic document classification methods in a library setting (2008) 0.00 
    0.0045322548 = product of:
  0.022661272 = sum of:
    0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022661272 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  17. Wartena, C.; Sommer, M.: Automatic classification of scientific records using the German Subject Heading Authority File (SWD) (2012) 0.00 
    0.0045322548 = product of:
  0.022661272 = sum of:
    0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022661272 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Vilares, D.; Alonso, M.A.; Gómez-Rodríguez, C.: On the usefulness of lexical and syntactic processing in polarity classification of Twitter messages (2015) 0.00 
    0.0045322548 = product of:
  0.022661272 = sum of:
    0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022661272 = score(doc=2161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  19. Chae, G.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Yeo, W.S.; Shi, C.: Linking and clustering artworks using social tags : revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections (2016) 0.00 
    0.0045322548 = product of:
  0.022661272 = sum of:
    0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022661272 = score(doc=2852,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  20. Ru, C.; Tang, J.; Li, S.; Xie, S.; Wang, T.: Using semantic similarity to reduce wrong labels in distant supervision for relation extraction (2018) 0.00 
    0.0045322548 = product of:
  0.022661272 = sum of:
    0.022661272 = weight(_text_:c in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022661272 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.118922785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.034476317 = queryNorm
        0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 31
  • d 6

Types

  • a 31
  • el 6
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes