Sjögårde, P.; Ahlgren, P.; Waltman, L.: Algorithmic labeling in hierarchical classifications of publications : evaluation of bibliographic fields and term weighting approaches (2021)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Algorithmic classifications of research publications can be used to study many different aspects of the science system, such as the organization of science into fields, the growth of fields, interdisciplinarity, and emerging topics. How to label the classes in these classifications is a problem that has not been thoroughly addressed in the literature. In this study, we evaluate different approaches to label the classes in algorithmically constructed classifications of research publications. We focus on two important choices: the choice of (a) different bibliographic fields and (b) different approaches to weight the relevance of terms. To evaluate the different choices, we created two baselines: one based on the Medical Subject Headings in MEDLINE and another based on the Science-Metrix journal classification. We tested to what extent different approaches yield the desired labels for the classes in the two baselines. Based on our results, we recommend extracting terms from titles and keywords to label classes at high levels of granularity (e.g., topics). At low levels of granularity (e.g., disciplines) we recommend extracting terms from journal names and author addresses. We recommend the use of a new approach, term frequency to specificity ratio, to calculate the relevance of terms.
