Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sugimoto, C.R."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Macaluso, B.; Milojevi´c, S.; Cronin, B.; Thelwall, M.: arXiv E-prints and the journal of record : an analysis of roles and relationships (2014) 0.01
    0.008393662 = product of:
      0.05036197 = sum of:
        0.05036197 = weight(_text_:b in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05036197 = score(doc=1285,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS), this article investigates (a) the proportion of papers across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers that are in the WoS, (b) the elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics, and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers-both published and unpublished-have lower citation rates than published papers, although there is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of published and unpublished papers.
  2. Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011) 0.01
    0.006853395 = product of:
      0.04112037 = sum of:
        0.04112037 = weight(_text_:b in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04112037 = score(doc=4608,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
  3. Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: Biobibliometric profiling : an examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship (2012) 0.01
    0.006784515 = product of:
      0.04070709 = sum of:
        0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 4991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04070709 = score(doc=4991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4991)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  4. Sugimoto, C.R.; Ni, C.; Russell, T.G.; Bychowski, B.: Academic genealogy as an indicator of interdisciplinarity : an examination of dissertation networks in Library and Information Science (2011) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 4756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=4756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4756)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Lee, C.J.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Zhang, G.; Cronin, B.: Bias in peer review (2013) 0.01
    0.0058152988 = product of:
      0.03489179 = sum of:
        0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03489179 = score(doc=525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=525)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  7. Demarest, B.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Argue, observe, assess : measuring disciplinary identities and differences through socio-epistemic discourse (2015) 0.00
    0.0048460825 = product of:
      0.029076494 = sum of:
        0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 2039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029076494 = score(doc=2039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2039)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)