Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0058152988 = product of:
  0.03489179 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Experiences with retrieval in OPACs suggest that there are major problems for the users of such systems, such as choosing the 'correct' subject access vocabulary, narrowing or broadening the set of items retrieved regarding the search interest. Such problems relate to two facts: (1) that in the early OPACs subject access has not been considered seriously enough and (2) that the complexity of the topic has not been really recognized. Using a typology of users' questions it is demonstrated which requirements musts be met by a successful online subject access. Improvements of subject access tools are primarily aimed at, pinpointing the interplay between the different subcomponents of any subject facility: a) the features of the indexing languages used; b) the indexing principles used; c) the design and structuring of the database; and d) the possibilities of the technical retrieval facility, the search mode, and query languages. The contribution summarizes the manifold interactions between the four subcomponents listed. Any successful retrieval will heavily depend on the design of these components considering their interactions.

0.0048460825 = product of:
  0.029076494 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings

0.0028405278 = product of:
  0.017043166 = sum of:
    0.017043166 = product of:
      0.03408633 = sum of:
        0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03408633 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

23. 7.2017 13:49:22