Search (114 results, page 2 of 6)

0.010965433 = product of:
  0.0657926 = sum of:
    0.0657926 = weight(_text_:b in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0657926 = score(doc=4698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.44287026 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Classification

Spr B 68 / Computerlinguistik

SBB

Spr B 68 / Computerlinguistik

0.010098464 = product of:
  0.03029539 = sum of:
    0.020353545 = weight(_text_:b in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020353545 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
    0.009941847 = product of:
      0.019883694 = sum of:
        0.019883694 = weight(_text_:22 in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019883694 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The information available in languages other than English in the World Wide Web is increasing significantly. According to a report from Computer Economics in 1999, 54% of Internet users are English speakers ("English Will Dominate Web for Only Three More Years," Computer Economics, July 9, 1999, http://www.computereconomics. com/new4/pr/pr990610.html). However, it is predicted that there will be only 60% increase in Internet users among English speakers verses a 150% growth among nonEnglish speakers for the next five years. By 2005, 57% of Internet users will be non-English speakers. A report by CNN.com in 2000 showed that the number of Internet users in China had been increased from 8.9 million to 16.9 million from January to June in 2000 ("Report: China Internet users double to 17 million," CNN.com, July, 2000, http://cnn.org/2000/TECH/computing/07/27/ china.internet.reut/index.html). According to Nielsen/ NetRatings, there was a dramatic leap from 22.5 millions to 56.6 millions Internet users from 2001 to 2002. China had become the second largest global at-home Internet population in 2002 (US's Internet population was 166 millions) (Robyn Greenspan, "China Pulls Ahead of Japan," Internet.com, April 22, 2002, http://cyberatias.internet.com/big-picture/geographics/article/0,,5911_1013841,00. html). All of the evidences reveal the importance of crosslingual research to satisfy the needs in the near future. Digital library research has been focusing in structural and semantic interoperability in the past. Searching and retrieving objects across variations in protocols, formats and disciplines are widely explored (Schatz, B., & Chen, H. (1999). Digital libraries: technological advances and social impacts. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, February, 32(2), 45-50.; Chen, H., Yen, J., & Yang, C.C. (1999). International activities: development of Asian digital libraries. IEEE Computer, Special Issue an Digital Libraries, 32(2), 48-49.). However, research in crossing language boundaries, especially across European languages and Oriental languages, is still in the initial stage. In this proposal, we put our focus an cross-lingual semantic interoperability by developing automatic generation of a cross-lingual thesaurus based an English/Chinese parallel corpus. When the searchers encounter retrieval problems, Professional librarians usually consult the thesaurus to identify other relevant vocabularies. In the problem of searching across language boundaries, a cross-lingual thesaurus, which is generated by co-occurrence analysis and Hopfield network, can be used to generate additional semantically relevant terms that cannot be obtained from dictionary. In particular, the automatically generated cross-lingual thesaurus is able to capture the unknown words that do not exist in a dictionary, such as names of persons, organizations, and events. Due to Hong Kong's unique history background, both English and Chinese are used as official languages in all legal documents. Therefore, English/Chinese cross-lingual information retrieval is critical for applications in courts and the government. In this paper, we develop an automatic thesaurus by the Hopfield network based an a parallel corpus collected from the Web site of the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government. Experiments are conducted to measure the precision and recall of the automatic generated English/Chinese thesaurus. The result Shows that such thesaurus is a promising tool to retrieve relevant terms, especially in the language that is not the same as the input term. The direct translation of the input term can also be retrieved in most of the cases.

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 8280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=8280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 8280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8280)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Type

b

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=1474,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 1750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=1750,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 1750, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1750)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Seit mehr als einem halben Jahrhundert existieren ernsthafte und ernst zu nehmende Versuche, menschliche Sprache maschinell zu verarbeiten. Maschinelle Übersetzung oder "natürliche" Dialoge mit Computern gehören zu den ersten Ideen, die den Bereich der späteren Computerlinguistik oder Sprachtechnologie abgesteckt und deren Vorhaben geleitet haben. Heute ist dieser auch maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung (natural language processing, NLP) genannte Bereich stark ausdiversifiziert: Durch die rapide Entwicklung der Informatik ist vieles vorher Unvorstellbare Realität (z. B. automatische Telefonauskunft), einiges früher Unmögliche immerhin möglich geworden (z. B. Handhelds mit Sprachein- und -ausgabe als digitale persönliche (Informations-)Assistenten). Es gibt verschiedene Anwendungen der Computerlinguistik, von denen einige den Sprung in die kommerzielle Nutzung geschafft haben (z. B. Diktiersysteme, Textklassifikation, maschinelle Übersetzung). Immer noch wird an natürlichsprachlichen Systemen (natural language systems, NLS) verschiedenster Funktionalität (z. B. zur Beantwortung beliebiger Fragen oder zur Generierung komplexer Texte) intensiv geforscht, auch wenn die hoch gesteckten Ziele von einst längst nicht erreicht sind (und deshalb entsprechend "heruntergefahren" wurden). Wo die maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung heute steht, ist allerdings angesichts der vielfältigen Aktivitäten in der Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie weder offensichtlich noch leicht in Erfahrung zu bringen (für Studierende des Fachs und erst recht für Laien). Ein Ziel dieses Buches ist, es, die aktuelle Literaturlage in dieser Hinsicht zu verbessern, indem spezifisch systembezogene Aspekte der Computerlinguistik als Überblick über die Sprachtechnologie zusammengetragen werden.

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=860)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

Vgl. auch: Agüera y Arcas, B.: Artificial neural networks are making strides towards consciousness..

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=861)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=930,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 930, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=930)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.009594754 = product of:
  0.057568524 = sum of:
    0.057568524 = weight(_text_:b in 7156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057568524 = score(doc=7156,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3875115 = fieldWeight in 7156, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7156)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Classification

Spr B 191 / Kommunikation

SBB

Spr B 191 / Kommunikation

0.009447232 = product of:
  0.05668339 = sum of:
    0.05668339 = product of:
      0.11336678 = sum of:
        0.11336678 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 1714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11336678 = score(doc=1714,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.45959038 = fieldWeight in 1714, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1714)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Classification

CV 3500 Psychologie / Sozialpsychologie / Kommunikation, Massenmedien, soziale Beeinflussung, soziale Macht

RVK

CV 3500 Psychologie / Sozialpsychologie / Kommunikation, Massenmedien, soziale Beeinflussung, soziale Macht

0.009352283 = product of:
  0.056113694 = sum of:
    0.056113694 = product of:
      0.11222739 = sum of:
        0.11222739 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 4805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11222739 = score(doc=4805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.45497125 = fieldWeight in 4805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

"Die Computerlinguistik vereinigt Elemente von Informatik und Linguistik; sie verwendet darüber hinaus Methoden aus weiteren Gebieten wie Mathematik, Psychologie, Statistik und künstliche Intelligenz. Der Reiz und die Herausforderung einer solchen interdisziplinären Wissenschaft liegen darin, Analogien zwischen Konzepten aus weit entfernten Teilgebieten zu erkennen und zu nutzen. Paradebeispiel dafür ist einer der entscheidenden Durchbrüche, welche die Computerlinguistik prägten. Es geht um das »Parsing«: Ein Computerprogramm, genauer gesagt ein Compiler, nimmt Zeichen für Zeichen den Input des Benutzers entgegen, der in diesem Fall seinerseits aus dem Text eines Computerprogramms besteht, und ermittelt dessen Struktur. Im Prinzip dasselbe tut ein Mensch, der einen gesprochenen Satz hört und versteht."

0.008224075 = product of:
  0.049344447 = sum of:
    0.049344447 = weight(_text_:b in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049344447 = score(doc=1145,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Lautes Denken ist eine bewährte Methode zum Erforschen kognitiver Prozesse. Es wird in vielen Disziplinen benutzt, z. B. um aufzudecken, welche Erfahrungen Benutzer bei der Interaktion mit Computerschnittstellen machen. Nach einer kurzen Erklärung des Lauten Denkens wird die App Thinkie vorgestellt. Thinkie ist eine mobile Lösung für das Laute Denken auf iPhone und iPad. Die Testperson nimmt auf dem iPhone den Ton auf. Die Spracherkennungssoftware Siri (http://www.apple.com/de/ios/siri/) transkribiert ihn. Parallel wird auf dem iPad oder einem anderen Gerät gefilmt. Auf dem iPad kann man - mit Video im Blick - das Transkript aufarbeiten und interpretieren. Die Textdateien transportiert Thinkie über eine Cloud-Kollektion, die Filme werden mit iTunes übertragen. Thinkie ist noch nicht tauglich für den praktischen Gebrauch. Noch sind die Sequenzen zu kurz, die Siri verarbeiten kann. Das wird sich ändern.

0.007753731 = product of:
  0.046522386 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 6295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=6295,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 6295, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6295)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.007753731 = product of:
  0.046522386 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=2585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.007753731 = product of:
  0.046522386 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=555,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 555, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=555)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

0.0075853188 = product of:
  0.045511913 = sum of:
    0.045511913 = weight(_text_:b in 6671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045511913 = score(doc=6671,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.30635473 = fieldWeight in 6671, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6671)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

HARMAN, D.: Relevance feedback revisited; AALBERSBERG, I.J.: Incremental relevance feedback; TAGUE-SUTCLIFFE, J.: Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process; LEWIS, D.D.: An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task; BLOSSEVILLE, M.J., G. HÉBRAIL, M.G. MONTEIL u. N. PÉNOT: Automatic document classification: natural language processing, statistical analysis, and expert system techniques used together; MASAND, B., G. LINOFF u. D. WALTZ: Classifying news stories using memory based reasoning; KEEN, E.M.: Term position ranking: some new test results; CROUCH, C.J. u. B. YANG: Experiments in automatic statistical thesaurus construction; GREFENSTETTE, G.: Use of syntactic context to produce term association lists for text retrieval; ANICK, P.G. u. R.A. FLYNN: Versioning of full-text information retrieval system; BURKOWSKI, F.J.: Retrieval activities in a database consisting of heterogeneous collections; DEERWESTER, S.C., K. WACLENA u. M. LaMAR: A textual object management system; NIE, J.-Y.:Towards a probabilistic modal logic for semantic-based information retrieval; WANG, A.W., S.K.M. WONG u. Y.Y. YAO: An analysis of vector space models based on computational geometry; BARTELL, B.T., G.W. COTTRELL u. R.K. BELEW: Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling; GLAVITSCH, U. u. P. SCHÄUBLE: A system for retrieving speech documents; MARGULIS, E.L.: N-Poisson document modelling; HESS, M.: An incrementally extensible document retrieval system based on linguistics and logical principles; COOPER, W.S., F.C. GEY u. D.P. DABNEY: Probabilistic retrieval based on staged logistic regression; FUHR, N.: Integration of probabilistic fact and text retrieval; CROFT, B., L.A. SMITH u. H. TURTLE: A loosely-coupled integration of a text retrieval system and an object-oriented database system; DUMAIS, S.T. u. J. NIELSEN: Automating the assignement of submitted manuscripts to reviewers; GOST, M.A. u. M. MASOTTI: Design of an OPAC database to permit different subject searching accesses; ROBERTSON, A.M. u. P. WILLETT: Searching for historical word forms in a database of 17th century English text using spelling correction methods; FAX, E.A., Q.F. CHEN u. L.S. HEATH: A faster algorithm for constructing minimal perfect hash functions; MOFFAT, A. u. J. ZOBEL: Parameterised compression for sparse bitmaps; GRANDI, F., P. TIBERIO u. P. Zezula: Frame-sliced patitioned parallel signature files; ALLEN, B.: Cognitive differences in end user searching of a CD-ROM index; SONNENWALD, D.H.: Developing a theory to guide the process of designing information retrieval systems; CUTTING, D.R., J.O. PEDERSEN, D. KARGER, u. J.W. TUKEY: Scatter/ Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections; CHALMERS, M. u. P. CHITSON: Bead: Explorations in information visualization; WILLIAMSON, C. u. B. SHNEIDERMAN: The dynamic HomeFinder: evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploring system

0.007574741 = product of:
  0.045448445 = sum of:
    0.045448445 = product of:
      0.09089689 = sum of:
        0.09089689 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09089689 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Source

Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108

0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 5872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=5872,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5872, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5872)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Content

Besteht aus folgenden Einzelbeiträgen: HESS, W.: Neuere Entwicklungen der Sprachsynthese; MÖBIUS, B. u. R. SPROAT: Linguistische Analyse in einem multilingualen Sprachsynthese-System; KRÖGER, B.J.: Von Sprechbewegungen zum akustischen Signal: artikulatorische Sprachsynthese; PORTELE, T.: Künstliche Sprache aus dem Baukasten: datenbasierte Sprachsynthese; KOHLER, K.J.: Modellgesteuerte Prosodie-Erzeugung

0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 2873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=2873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 2873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2873)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)