Search (247 results, page 2 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Cerda-Cosme, R.; Méndez, E.: Analysis of shared research data in Spanish scientific papers about COVID-19 : a first approach (2023) 0.01 
    0.0144263785 = product of:
  0.043279134 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
    0.014202639 = product of:
      0.028405279 = sum of:
        0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028405279 = score(doc=916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=916)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:02
  2. Sellen, M.K.: Bibliometrics : an annotated bibliography 1970-1990 (1993) 0.01 
    0.01356903 = product of:
  0.08141418 = sum of:
    0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08141418 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Type
    b
  3. Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001) 0.01 
    0.01356903 = product of:
  0.08141418 = sum of:
    0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08141418 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  4. Informetrics '91 : selected papers from the 3rd International Conference on Bibliometrics, 9-12 Aug. 1991, Bangalore (1993) 0.01 
    0.0116305975 = product of:
  0.06978358 = sum of:
    0.06978358 = weight(_text_:b in 5063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06978358 = score(doc=5063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 5063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5063)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science 25(1993) no.4, S.216 (B. Cronin)
  5. Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002) 0.01 
    0.0116305975 = product of:
  0.06978358 = sum of:
    0.06978358 = weight(_text_:b in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06978358 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Does informetrics need a theory? : a rejoinder to professor anthony van raan (2017) 0.01 
    0.0116305975 = product of:
  0.06978358 = sum of:
    0.06978358 = weight(_text_:b in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06978358 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  7. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01 
    0.011541101 = product of:
  0.034623303 = sum of:
    0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023261193 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
    0.011362111 = product of:
      0.022724222 = sum of:
        0.022724222 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022724222 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  8. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
  9. Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Type
    b
  10. Cronin, B.: On the epistemic significance of place (2008) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 4853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=4853,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4853, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4853)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  11. Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  12. Karlsson, A.; Hammarfelt, B.; Steinhauer, H.J.; Falkman, G.; Olson, N.; Nelhans, G.; Nolin, J.: Modeling uncertainty in bibliometrics and information retrieval : an information fusion approach (2015) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 1696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=1696,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 1696, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1696)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  13. Dederke, J.; Hirschmann, B.; Johann, D.: ¬Der Data Citation Index von Clarivate : Eine wertvolle Ressource für die Forschung und für Bibliotheken? (2022) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  14. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Macaluso, B.; Milojevi´c, S.; Cronin, B.; Thelwall, M.: arXiv E-prints and the journal of record : an analysis of roles and relationships (2014) 0.01 
    0.008393662 = product of:
  0.05036197 = sum of:
    0.05036197 = weight(_text_:b in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05036197 = score(doc=1285,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS), this article investigates (a) the proportion of papers across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers that are in the WoS, (b) the elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics, and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers-both published and unpublished-have lower citation rates than published papers, although there is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of published and unpublished papers.
  15. Sugimoto, C.R.; Pratt , J.A.; Hauser, K.: Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared impact of LIS/MIS fields (2008) 0.01 
    0.008224075 = product of:
  0.049344447 = sum of:
    0.049344447 = weight(_text_:b in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049344447 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This study utilized bibliometric tools to analyze the relationship between two separate, but related, fields: Library and Information Science (LIS) and Management Information Systems (MIS). The top-ranked 48 journals in each field were used as the unit of analysis. Using these journals, field cocitation was introduced as a method for evaluating the relationships between the two fields. The three-phased study evaluated (a) the knowledge imported/exported between LIS and MIS, (b) the body of knowledge influenced by both fields, and (c) the overlap in fields as demonstrated by multidimensional scaling. Data collection and analysis were performed using DIALOG and SPSS programs. The primary findings from this study indicate that (a) the MIS impact on LIS is greater than the reverse, (b) there is a growing trend for shared impact between the two disciplines, and (c) the area of overlap between the two fields is predominately those journals focusing on technology systems and digital information. Additionally, this study validated field cocitation as a method by which to evaluate relationships between fields.
  16. Aris, A.; Shneiderman, B.; Qazvinian, V.; Radev, D.: Visual overviews for discovering key papers and influences across research fronts (2009) 0.01 
    0.008224075 = product of:
  0.049344447 = sum of:
    0.049344447 = weight(_text_:b in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049344447 = score(doc=3156,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Gaining a rapid overview of an emerging scientific topic, sometimes called research fronts, is an increasingly common task due to the growing amount of interdisciplinary collaboration. Visual overviews that show temporal patterns of paper publication and citation links among papers can help researchers and analysts to see the rate of growth of topics, identify key papers, and understand influences across subdisciplines. This article applies a novel network-visualization tool based on meaningful layouts of nodes to present research fronts and show citation links that indicate influences across research fronts. To demonstrate the value of two-dimensional layouts with multiple regions and user control of link visibility, we conducted a design-oriented, preliminary case study with 6 domain experts over a 4-month period. The main benefits were being able (a) to easily identify key papers and see the increasing number of papers within a research front, and (b) to quickly see the strength and direction of influence across related research fronts.
  17. Milard, B.; Tanguy, L.: Citations in scientific texts : do social relations matter? (2018) 0.01 
    0.008224075 = product of:
  0.049344447 = sum of:
    0.049344447 = weight(_text_:b in 4547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049344447 = score(doc=4547,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3321527 = fieldWeight in 4547, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4547)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This article presents an investigation of the role of social relations in the writing of scientific articles through the study of in-text citations. Does the fact that the author of an article knows the author whose work he or she cites have an impact on the context of the citation? Because citations are commonly used as criteria for research evaluation, it is important to question their social background to better understand how it impacts textual features. We studied a collection of science articles (N?=?123) from 5 disciplines and interviewed their authors (N?=?84) to: (a) identify the social relations between citing and cited authors; and (b) measure the correlation between a set of features related to in-text citations (N?=?6,956) and the identified social relations. Our pioneering work, mixing sociological and linguistic results, shows that social relations between authors can partly explain the variations of citations in terms of frequency, position and textual context.
  18. Lee, W.M.: Publication trends of doctoral students in three fields from 1965-1995 (2000) 0.01 
    0.008016243 = product of:
  0.048097454 = sum of:
    0.048097454 = product of:
      0.09619491 = sum of:
        0.09619491 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 4383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09619491 = score(doc=4383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.38997537 = fieldWeight in 4383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Field
    Psychologie
  19. Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing als Re-Ranking-Ansatz in Literaturinformationssystemen (2011) 0.01 
    0.008016243 = product of:
  0.048097454 = sum of:
    0.048097454 = product of:
      0.09619491 = sum of:
        0.09619491 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09619491 = score(doc=4292,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.38997537 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird ein Re-Ranking-Ansatz für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, der die Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur messbar verbessern kann. Das nichttextorientierte Rankingverfahren Bradfordizing wird eingeführt und anschließend im empirischen Teil des Artikels bzgl. der Effektivität für typische fachbezogene Recherche-Topics evaluiert. Dem Bradford Law of Scattering (BLS), auf dem Bradfordizing basiert, liegt zugrunde, dass sich die Literatur zu einem beliebigen Fachgebiet bzw. -thema in Zonen unterschiedlicher Dokumentenkonzentration verteilt. Dem Kernbereich mit hoher Konzentration der Literatur folgen Bereiche mit mittlerer und geringer Konzentration. Bradfordizing sortiert bzw. rankt eine Dokumentmenge damit nach den sogenannten Kernzeitschriften. Der Retrievaltest mit 164 intellektuell bewerteten Fragestellungen in Fachdatenbanken aus den Bereichen Sozial- und Politikwissenschaften, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin zeigt, dass die Dokumente der Kernzeitschriften signifikant häufiger relevant bewertet werden als Dokumente der zweiten Dokumentzone bzw. den Peripherie-Zeitschriften. Die Implementierung von Bradfordizing und weiteren Re-Rankingverfahren liefert unmittelbare Mehrwerte für den Nutzer.
  20. Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010) 0.01 
    0.008016243 = product of:
  0.048097454 = sum of:
    0.048097454 = product of:
      0.09619491 = sum of:
        0.09619491 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09619491 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.38997537 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In dieser Arbeit werden zwei Mehrwertdienste für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, die typische Probleme bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur behandeln können. Die beiden Mehrwertdienste semantische Heterogenitätsbehandlung am Beispiel Crosskonkordanzen und Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing, die in unterschiedlichen Phasen der Suche zum Einsatz kommen, werden in diesem Buch ausführlich beschrieben und evaluiert. Für die Tests wurden Fragestellungen und Daten aus zwei Evaluationsprojekten (CLEF und KoMoHe) verwendet. Die intellektuell bewerteten Dokumente stammen aus insgesamt sieben Fachdatenbanken der Fächer Sozialwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sind in das GESIS-Projekt IRM eingeflossen.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 220
  • d 24
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 234
  • m 8
  • s 6
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications