-
Hildebrandt, B.; Moratz, R.; Rickheit, G.; Sagerer, G.: Kognitive Modellierung von Sprach- und Bildverstehen (1996)
0.11
0.108737335 = product of:
0.326212 = sum of:
0.06978358 = weight(_text_:b in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06978358 = score(doc=7292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
0.2564284 = weight(_text_:kognitive in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2564284 = score(doc=7292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28477833 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.90044916 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7916126 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Gardin, J.C.: Document analysis and linguistic theory (1973)
0.06
0.05661586 = product of:
0.33969516 = sum of:
0.33969516 = weight(_text_:168 in 2387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33969516 = score(doc=2387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28385672 = queryWeight, product of:
6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
1.1967134 = fieldWeight in 2387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.769634 = idf(docFreq=137, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2387)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.2, S.137-168
-
Allen, B.; Reser, D.: Content analysis in library and information science research (1990)
0.02
0.015507462 = product of:
0.09304477 = sum of:
0.09304477 = weight(_text_:b in 7510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09304477 = score(doc=7510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.6263131 = fieldWeight in 7510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7510)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.01
0.01356903 = product of:
0.08141418 = sum of:
0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08141418 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Piekara, F.H.: Wie idiosynkratisch ist Wissen? : Individuelle Unterschiede im Assoziieren und bei der Anlage und Nutzung von Informationssystemen (1988)
0.01
0.010688323 = product of:
0.06412993 = sum of:
0.06412993 = product of:
0.12825987 = sum of:
0.12825987 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 2537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12825987 = score(doc=2537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.51996714 = fieldWeight in 2537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2537)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Series
- Europäische Hochschulschriften: Reihe 6, Psychologie; Bd.240
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989)
0.01
0.009692165 = product of:
0.05815299 = sum of:
0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05815299 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Volpers, H.: Inhaltsanalyse (2013)
0.01
0.009352283 = product of:
0.056113694 = sum of:
0.056113694 = product of:
0.11222739 = sum of:
0.11222739 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 1018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11222739 = score(doc=1018,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24666919 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.45497125 = fieldWeight in 1018, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1018)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Der Begriff Inhaltsanalyse wird je nach wissenschaftlicher Provenienz oder Bedeutungszusammenhang unterschiedlich definiert: Innerhalb der bibliothekarischen Praxis wird die Erfassung des Inhaltes eines vorliegenden Dokumentes für die Zwecke der Indexierung als Inhaltsanalyse bezeichnet, philologische Textinterpretationen oder sprachwissenschaftliche Textanalysen werden gelegentlich als Inhaltsanalysen etikettiert, ebenso die Interpretation von Interviewaussagen in der Psychologie und qualitativen Sozialforschung. Der vorliegende Beitrag bezieht sich explizit auf die sozialwissenschaftliche Methode der systematischen Inhaltsanalyse. Allerdings ist auch durch diese Eingrenzung noch keine hinreichende definitorische Klarheit geschaffen, da eine Unterscheidung in qualitative und quantitative Verfahren vorzunehmen ist.
-
Pozzi de Sousa, B.; Ortega, C.D.: Aspects regarding the notion of subject in the context of different theoretical trends : teaching approaches in Brazil (2018)
0.01
0.007753731 = product of:
0.046522386 = sum of:
0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046522386 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject (of documents) (2016)
0.01
0.006853395 = product of:
0.04112037 = sum of:
0.04112037 = weight(_text_:b in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04112037 = score(doc=3182,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, ed. by B. Hjoerland. [http://www.isko.org/cyclo/logical_division]
-
Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001)
0.01
0.006784515 = product of:
0.04070709 = sum of:
0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04070709 = score(doc=6032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Knowledge organization (KO) (2017)
0.01
0.006784515 = product of:
0.04070709 = sum of:
0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04070709 = score(doc=3418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992)
0.01
0.0058152988 = product of:
0.03489179 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Modelling what users see when they look at images : a cognitive viewpoint (2002)
0.01
0.0058152988 = product of:
0.03489179 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Garcia Jiménez, A.; Valle Gastaminza, F. del: From thesauri to ontologies: a case study in a digital visual context (2004)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In this paper a framework for the construction and organization of knowledge organization and representation languages in the context of digital photograph collections is presented. It analyses exigencies of photographs as documentary objects, as well as several models of indexing, different proposals of languages and a theoretical revision of ontologies in this research field, in relation to visual documents. In considering the photograph as an analysis object, it is appropriate to study all its attributes: features, components or properties of an objeet that can be represented in an information processing system. The attributes which are related to visual features include cognitive and affective answers and elements that describe spatial, semantic, symbolic or emotional features about a photograph. In any case, it is necessary to treat: a) morphological and material attributes (emulsion, state of preservation); b) biographical attributes: (school or trend, publication or exhibition); c) attributes of content: what and how a photograph says something; d) relational attributes: visual documents establish relationships with other documents that can be analysed in order to understand them.
-
Wilson, M.J.; Wilson, M.L.: ¬A comparison of techniques for measuring sensemaking and learning within participant-generated summaries (2013)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- While it is easy to identify whether someone has found a piece of information during a search task, it is much harder to measure how much someone has learned during the search process. Searchers who are learning often exhibit exploratory behaviors, and so current research is often focused on improving support for exploratory search. Consequently, we need effective measures of learning to demonstrate better support for exploratory search. Some approaches, such as quizzes, measure recall when learning from a fixed source of information. This research, however, focuses on techniques for measuring open-ended learning, which often involve analyzing handwritten summaries produced by participants after a task. There are two common techniques for analyzing such summaries: (a) counting facts and statements and (b) judging topic coverage. Both of these techniques, however, can be easily confounded by simple variables such as summary length. This article presents a new technique that measures depth of learning within written summaries based on Bloom's taxonomy (B.S. Bloom & M.D. Engelhart, 1956). This technique was generated using grounded theory and is designed to be less susceptible to such confounding variables. Together, these three categories of measure were compared by applying them to a large collection of written summaries produced in a task-based study, and our results provide insights into each of their strengths and weaknesses. Both fact-to-statement ratio and our own measure of depth of learning were effective while being less affected by confounding variables. Recommendations and clear areas of future work are provided to help continued research into supporting sensemaking and learning.
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.00
0.0047342135 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = product of:
0.056810558 = sum of:
0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056810558 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.00
0.0037873704 = product of:
0.022724222 = sum of:
0.022724222 = product of:
0.045448445 = sum of:
0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045448445 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.00
0.0037873704 = product of:
0.022724222 = sum of:
0.022724222 = product of:
0.045448445 = sum of:
0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045448445 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.00
0.003347594 = product of:
0.020085564 = sum of:
0.020085564 = product of:
0.040171128 = sum of:
0.040171128 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040171128 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996)
0.00
0.0028405278 = product of:
0.017043166 = sum of:
0.017043166 = product of:
0.03408633 = sum of:
0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03408633 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
