-
Alex, H.: ¬Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) (2018)
0.01
0.006784515 = product of:
0.04070709 = sum of:
0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 4338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04070709 = score(doc=4338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4338)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) ist die international am weitesten verbreitete bibliothekarische Klassifikation. Ursprünglich vor allem im anglo-amerikanischen Raum eingesetzt, ist sie heute aufgrund vieler Übersetzungen unter anderem auch in Europa - seit Erscheinen der deutschen Ausgabe auch im deutschsprachigen Raum - weit verbreitet. Die Schwerpunkte dieses Beitrags liegen zum einen auf dem Klassifikationssystem selbst, indem z. B. sein Aufbau und die Notationsvergabe erklärt werden, und zum anderen auf der DDC-Anwendung im deutschsprachigen Raum (u. a. Projekt DDC Deutsch, WebDewey Deutsch, Anwendung der DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek).
-
Lund, B.; Agbaji, D.: Use of Dewey Decimal Classification by academic libraries in the United States (2018)
0.01
0.006784515 = product of:
0.04070709 = sum of:
0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04070709 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Slavic, A.; Davies, S.: Facet analysis in UDC : questions of structure, functionality and data formality (2017)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 3848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=3848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3848)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The paper will look into different patterns of facet analysis used in the UDC schedules and how these affect the scheme presentation, the underlying data structure and the management of the classification scheme. From the very beginning, UDC was designed to represent the universe of knowledge as an integral whole allowing for subjects/concepts from all fields of knowledge to be combined, linked and the nature of their relationships made explicit. In Otlet's original design, the emphasis for his new type of classification was on the coordination of classmarks at the point of searching, i.e., post-coordination, which he firmly rooted in an expressive notational system. While some UDC classes exhibit various patterns of facet analytical theory proper, others, although used in an analytico-synthetic fashion, follow less canonical structural patterns. The authors highlight the lack of connection made throughout the various stages of UDC restructuring between: a) theoretical requirements of an overarching facet analytical theory as a founding principle guiding the construction of schedules; and, b) practical requirements for an analytico-synthetic classification in terms of notational presentation and data structure that enables its use in indexing and retrieval, as well as its management online.
-
Junger, U.: Basisinformationen zur Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (UDK) (2018)
0.00
0.0037873704 = product of:
0.022724222 = sum of:
0.022724222 = product of:
0.045448445 = sum of:
0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 4337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045448445 = score(doc=4337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 7. 7.2018 17:22:00
-
Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012)
0.00
0.0023671067 = product of:
0.014202639 = sum of:
0.014202639 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028405279 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 3. 3.2016 18:59:22
-
Panzer, M.: Dewey: how to make it work for you (2013)
0.00
0.0023671067 = product of:
0.014202639 = sum of:
0.014202639 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028405279 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge quest. 42(2013) no.2, S.22-29
