Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.02 
    0.023082202 = product of:
  0.069246605 = sum of:
    0.046522386 = weight(_text_:b in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046522386 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
    0.022724222 = product of:
      0.045448445 = sum of:
        0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045448445 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  2. Rosenberger, B.: ¬Die neue Online-Systematik der Universitätsbibliothek Hagen (2000) 0.01 
    0.01356903 = product of:
  0.08141418 = sum of:
    0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 4354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08141418 = score(doc=4354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 4354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4354)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  3. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.01 
    0.01356903 = product of:
  0.08141418 = sum of:
    0.08141418 = weight(_text_:b in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08141418 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.54802394 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  4. Lischewsky-Weiser, B.: ¬Die Systematik im OPAC (1992) 0.01 
    0.0116305975 = product of:
  0.06978358 = sum of:
    0.06978358 = weight(_text_:b in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06978358 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.46973482 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  5. ¬Die Systematik im OPAC : über das Instrumentarium zum Ordnen und Wiederfinden. Vorträge aus den bibliothekarischen Arbeitsgruppen der 16. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Dortmund 1992 (1993) 0.01 
    0.010072393 = product of:
  0.06043436 = sum of:
    0.06043436 = weight(_text_:b in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06043436 = score(doc=8,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.40680233 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: LISCHEWSKY-WEISER, B.: Die Systematik im OPAC; GREINER, G.: Facettensysteme; LORENZ, B.: Überlegungen zur Aufstellungsklassifikation; HERMES, H.-J.: Dezimalklassifikation: zum gegenwärtigen Stand der UDK; TRAISER, W.: Die Deutsche Bibliothek: Schlagwort-Klassifikation und Conspectus; BIES, W.: Inhaltserschließung: Versuch einer bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Didaktik; RECKER-KOTULLA, I.: Die niederländische Basisklassifikation als Instrument der kooperativen Sacherschließung; JEDWABSKI, B. u. K. SCHRÖDER: UBOK: Der Dortmunder Universitätsbibliotheks-Online-Katalog; KOWALK, W.: Der Saarbrücker Sachkatalog nach der Methode Eppelsheimer im OPAC; NOHR, H.: Präkombination klassifikatorischer und verbaler Sacherschließungsdaten und ihr Potential im Information Retrieval
  6. Wätjen, H.-J.; Diekmann, B.; Möller, G.; Carstensen, K.-U.: Bericht zum DFG-Projekt: GERHARD : German Harvest Automated Retrieval and Directory (1998) 0.01 
    0.009692165 = product of:
  0.05815299 = sum of:
    0.05815299 = weight(_text_:b in 3065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05815299 = score(doc=3065,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3065, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3065)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  7. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.008393662 = product of:
  0.05036197 = sum of:
    0.05036197 = weight(_text_:b in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05036197 = score(doc=2478,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  8. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.01 
    0.008393662 = product of:
  0.05036197 = sum of:
    0.05036197 = weight(_text_:b in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05036197 = score(doc=2480,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  9. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A concept-map thesaurus as a knowledge-based hypertext interface to a bibliographic database (1990) 0.01 
    0.008393662 = product of:
  0.05036197 = sum of:
    0.05036197 = weight(_text_:b in 2481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05036197 = score(doc=2481,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.33900195 = fieldWeight in 2481, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2481)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
  10. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.01 
    0.007574741 = product of:
  0.045448445 = sum of:
    0.045448445 = product of:
      0.09089689 = sum of:
        0.09089689 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09089689 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
  11. Slavic, A.; Turkulin, B.: Prevajanje klasifikacijskih oznak v naravni jezik (1998) 0.01 
    0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=3229,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  12. ¬The UDC : Essays for a new decade (1990) 0.01 
    0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: STRACHAN, P.D.: UDC revision work in FID; SCIBOR, E. u. I.S. SHCHERBINA-SAMOJLOVA: A strategic approach to to revising the UDC; MCILWAINE, I.: The work of the system development task force; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The UDC: its future; HAARALA, A.-R.: FID pre-conference seminar on computer applications of the UDC; LOTH, K. u. H. FUNK: Subject search on ETHICS on the basis of the UDC; KURHULA, P.: Use and usability of the UDC in classification practice and online retrieval; RINNE, B.: HELECON system: economics databases; NAKAMURA, Y. u. T. ISHIKAWA: Expert systems for automatic UDC number assignment; RIESTHUIS, G.J.A. u. S. BLIEDUNG: Thesaurification of UDC: preliminary report
  13. Gödert, W.: Facettenklassifikation im Online-Retrieval (1992) 0.01 
    0.006784515 = product of:
  0.04070709 = sum of:
    0.04070709 = weight(_text_:b in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04070709 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.27401197 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.
  14. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.01 
    0.0058152988 = product of:
  0.03489179 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  15. Maibach, C.: ¬Die DDC auf neuen Wegen : verbale Sucheinstiege für klassifikatorisch erschlossene Titel (2014) 0.01 
    0.0058152988 = product of:
  0.03489179 = sum of:
    0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 2482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489179 = score(doc=2482,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2482, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2482)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) ist ein mächtiges Instrument der klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung. Immer mehr Bibliotheken im In- und Ausland erkennen den Nutzen der international am weitesten verbreiteten Universalklassifikation. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) setzt die DDC seit 2006 für die inhaltliche Erschließung der Bibliografiereihen A, B und H ein. Seitdem wurden rund 800.000 Publikationen mit DDC-Notationen versehen. Der Nutzen von Klassifikationen ist unter Bibliothekar/innen unumstritten. Die Bibliotheksnutzer/innen hingegen wissen oft nicht, dass der Katalog ihrer Bibliothek auch eine systematische Recherche ermöglicht. Ihre Recherchestrategie ist meist verbal. Durch Internetsuchmaschinen wird diese Strategie noch bestärkt. Daher liegt es nahe, auch für die klassifikatorisch erschlossenen Titel einen verbalen Sucheinstieg zu schaffen. ie DDC enthält nicht nur die in vielen Klassifikationssystemen üblichen Registereinträge und Klassenbenennungen, sondern auch die im Rahmen des Projekts CrissCross in großem Umfang erstellten Verknüpfungen zu Schlagwörtern der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND), die für diesen Zweck ausgewertet werden können.
  16. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.0056810556 = product of:
  0.03408633 = sum of:
    0.03408633 = product of:
      0.06817266 = sum of:
        0.06817266 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06817266 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041930884 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  17. New roles for classification in libraries and information networks : presentations and reports from the 36th Allerton Institute, Oct. 23-25, 1994 (1995) 0.00 
    0.0048460825 = product of:
  0.029076494 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 6049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=6049,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 6049, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6049)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge; COCHRANE, P.A.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks; CHAN, L.M.: Classification, present and future; MOLHOLP, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the information superhighway; DAHLBERG, I.: The future of classification in libraries and networks: a theoretical point of view; MITCHELL, J.: DDC21 and beyond: the Dewey Decimal Classification prepares for the future; McILWAINE, I.: Preparing traditional classifications for the future: Universal Decimal Classification; COATES, E.J.: BC2 and BSO: presentation at the 36th Allerton Institue, 1994 Session of preparing traditional classifications for the future; HILL, J.S.: Calssification: an administrative perspective; WYLY, B.: What lies ahead for classification in information networks? Report of a panel discussion; ZIADIE, A.M.: Classification in libraries and networks abroad: report of a panel discussion; LINCICUM, S.: Critical appraisal of the use of classification in the future - non-traditional uses of classification: report of a panel discussion; THOMAS, A.R.S.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks: an excerpt bibliography; BROADBENT, E.: Classification access in the online catalog
  18. Wyly, B.: What lies ahead for classification in information networks? : report of a panel discussion (1995) 0.00 
    0.0048460825 = product of:
  0.029076494 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 5568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=5568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5568)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  19. Hjoerland, B.; Pedersen, K.N.: ¬A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval (2005) 0.00 
    0.0048460825 = product of:
  0.029076494 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  20. Gödert, W.: Facet classification in online retrieval (1991) 0.00 
    0.0048460825 = product of:
  0.029076494 = sum of:
    0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 5825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029076494 = score(doc=5825,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.041930884 = queryNorm
        0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 5825, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5825)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The study of faceted classification systems has primarily been directed towards application for precombined catalogues or bibliographies, not so much for use in post coordinated retrieval systems. Argues that faceted classification systems in some respects are superior to other techniques of on-line retrieval as far as facet and concept analysis is combined with an expressive notational system in order to guide a form of retrieval which will use Boolean operators (for combining the facets regardless of one special citation order) and truncation for retrieving hierarchically different sets of documents. This point of view is demonstrated by 2 examples. The 1st one uses a short classification system derived from B. Buchanan and the 2nd is built upon the classification system used by Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Further discussion is concerned with some possible consequences which could be derived from a retrieval with PRECIS strings

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 30
  • d 13
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 34
  • s 6
  • el 4
  • m 4
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications