-
Pal, D.; Mitra, M.; Datta, K.: Improving query expansion using WordNet (2014)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=1545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This study proposes a new way of using WordNet for query expansion (QE). We choose candidate expansion terms from a set of pseudo-relevant documents; however, the usefulness of these terms is measured based on their definitions provided in a hand-crafted lexical resource such as WordNet. Experiments with a number of standard TREC collections WordNet-based that this method outperforms existing WordNet-based methods. It also compares favorably with established QE methods such as KLD and RM3. Leveraging earlier work in which a combination of QE methods was found to outperform each individual method (as well as other well-known QE methods), we next propose a combination-based QE method that takes into account three different aspects of a candidate expansion term's usefulness: (a) its distribution in the pseudo-relevant documents and in the target corpus, (b) its statistical association with query terms, and (c) its semantic relation with the query, as determined by the overlap between the WordNet definitions of the term and query terms. This combination of diverse sources of information appears to work well on a number of test collections, viz., TREC123, TREC5, TREC678, TREC robust (new), and TREC910 collections, and yields significant improvements over competing methods on most of these collections.
-
Baofu, P.: ¬The future of information architecture : conceiving a better way to understand taxonomy, network, and intelligence (2008)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 2257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=2257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2257)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The Future of Information Architecture examines issues surrounding why information is processed, stored and applied in the way that it has, since time immemorial. Contrary to the conventional wisdom held by many scholars in human history, the recurrent debate on the explanation of the most basic categories of information (eg space, time causation, quality, quantity) has been misconstrued, to the effect that there exists some deeper categories and principles behind these categories of information - with enormous implications for our understanding of reality in general. To understand this, the book is organised in to four main parts: Part I begins with the vital question concerning the role of information within the context of the larger theoretical debate in the literature. Part II provides a critical examination of the nature of data taxonomy from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part III constructively invesitgates the world of information network from the main perspectives of culture, society, nature and the mind. Part IV proposes six main theses in the authors synthetic theory of information architecture, namely, (a) the first thesis on the simpleness-complicatedness principle, (b) the second thesis on the exactness-vagueness principle (c) the third thesis on the slowness-quickness principle (d) the fourth thesis on the order-chaos principle, (e) the fifth thesis on the symmetry-asymmetry principle, and (f) the sixth thesis on the post-human stage.
-
Xu, B.; Lin, H.; Lin, Y.: Assessment of learning to rank methods for query expansion (2016)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Adhikari, A.; Dutta, B.; Dutta, A.; Mondal, D.; Singh, S.: ¬An intrinsic information content-based semantic similarity measure considering the disjoint common subsumers of concepts of an ontology (2018)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Kasprzik, A.; Kett, J.: Vorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließung und Schritte zur fortgesetzten strukturellen Aufwertung der GND (2018)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Aufgrund der fortgesetzten Publikationsflut stellt sich immer dringender die Frage, wie die Schwellen für die Titel- und Normdatenpflege gesenkt werden können - sowohl für die intellektuelle als auch die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Zu einer Verbesserung der Daten- und Arbeitsqualität in der Sacherschließung kann beigetragen werden a) durch eine flexible Visualisierung der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und anderer Wissensorganisationssysteme, so dass deren Graphstruktur intuitiv erfassbar wird, und b) durch eine investigative Analyse ihrer aktuellen Struktur und die Entwicklung angepasster automatisierter Methoden zur Ermittlung und Korrektur fehlerhafter Muster. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) prüft im Rahmen des GND-Entwicklungsprogramms 2017-2021, welche Bedingungen für eine fruchtbare community-getriebene Open-Source-Entwicklung entsprechender Werkzeuge gegeben sein müssen. Weiteres Potential steckt in einem langfristigen Übergang zu einer Darstellung von Titel- und Normdaten in Beschreibungssprachen im Sinne des Semantic Web (RDF; OWL, SKOS). So profitiert die GND von der Interoperabilität mit anderen kontrollierten Vokabularen und von einer erleichterten Interaktion mit anderen Fach-Communities und kann umgekehrt auch außerhalb des Bibliothekswesens zu einem noch attraktiveren Wissensorganisationssystem werden. Darüber hinaus bieten die Ansätze aus dem Semantic Web die Möglichkeit, stärker formalisierte, strukturierende Satellitenvokabulare rund um die GND zu entwickeln. Daraus ergeben sich nicht zuletzt auch neue Perspektiven für die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Es wäre lohnend, näher auszuloten, wie und inwieweit semantisch-logische Verfahren den bestehenden Methodenmix bereichern können.
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.00
0.004797377 = product of:
0.028784262 = sum of:
0.028784262 = weight(_text_:b in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028784262 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19375575 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
-
Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016)
0.00
0.0047342135 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = product of:
0.056810558 = sum of:
0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056810558 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016)
0.00
0.0047342135 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = product of:
0.056810558 = sum of:
0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056810558 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016)
0.00
0.0047342135 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = product of:
0.056810558 = sum of:
0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056810558 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.00
0.0047342135 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = product of:
0.056810558 = sum of:
0.056810558 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056810558 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.00
0.004686632 = product of:
0.028119791 = sum of:
0.028119791 = product of:
0.056239583 = sum of:
0.056239583 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056239583 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: Interactive query expansion : a user-based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment (2000)
0.00
0.0038768656 = product of:
0.023261193 = sum of:
0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023261193 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- A user-centered investigation of interactive query expansion within the context of a relevance feedback system is presented in this article. Data were collected from 25 searches using the INSPEC database. The data collection mechanisms included questionnaires, transaction logs, and relevance evaluations. The results discuss issues that relate to query expansion, retrieval effectiveness, the correspondence of the on-line-to-off-line relevance judgments, and the selection of terms for query expansion by users (interactive query expansion). The main conclusions drawn from the results of the study are that: (1) one-third of the terms presented to users in a list of candidate terms for query expansion was identified by the users as potentially useful for query expansion. (2) These terms were mainly judged as either variant expressions (synonyms) or alternative (related) terms to the initial query terms. However, a substantial portion of the selected terms were identified as representing new ideas. (3) The relationships identified between the five best terms selected by the users for query expansion and the initial query terms were that: (a) 34% of the query expansion terms have no relationship or other type of correspondence with a query term; (b) 66% of the remaining query expansion terms have a relationship to the query terms. These relationships were: narrower term (46%), broader term (3%), related term (17%). (4) The results provide evidence for the effectiveness of interactive query expansion. The initial search produced on average three highly relevant documents; the query expansion search produced on average nine further highly relevant documents. The conclusions highlight the need for more research on: interactive query expansion, the comparative evaluation of automatic vs. interactive query expansion, the study of weighted Webbased or Web-accessible retrieval systems in operational environments, and for user studies in searching ranked retrieval systems in general
-
Koopman, B.; Zuccon, G.; Bruza, P.; Sitbon, L.; Lawley, M.: Information retrieval as semantic inference : a graph Inference model applied to medical search (2016)
0.00
0.0038768656 = product of:
0.023261193 = sum of:
0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 3260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023261193 = score(doc=3260,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 3260, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3260)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Surfing versus Drilling for knowledge in science : When should you use your computer? When should you use your brain? (2018)
0.00
0.0038768656 = product of:
0.023261193 = sum of:
0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023261193 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Infozine 2018, Special Issue 2 [DOI 10.3929/ethz-b-000298711]
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994)
0.00
0.0037873704 = product of:
0.022724222 = sum of:
0.022724222 = product of:
0.045448445 = sum of:
0.045448445 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045448445 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:35:22
-
Caro Castro, C.; Travieso Rodríguez, C.: Ariadne's thread : knowledge structures for browsing in OPAC's (2003)
0.00
0.0033922575 = product of:
0.020353545 = sum of:
0.020353545 = weight(_text_:b in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020353545 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Subject searching is the most common but also the most conflictive searching for end user. The aim of this paper is to check how users expressions match subject headings and to prove if knowledge structure used in online catalogs enhances searching effectiveness. A bibliographic revision about difficulties in subject access and proposed methods to improve it is also presented. For the empirical analysis, transaction logs from two university libraries, online catalogs (CISNE and FAMA) were collected. Results show that more than a quarter of user queries are effective due to an alphabetical subject index approach and browsing through hypertextual links. 1. Introduction Since the 1980's, online public access catalogs (OPAC's) have become usual way to access bibliographic information. During the last two decades the technological development has helped to extend their use, making feasible the access for a whole of users that is getting more and more extensive and heterogeneous, and also to incorporate information resources in electronic formats and to interconnect systems. However, technology seems to have developed faster than our knowledge about the tasks where it has been applied and than the evolution of our capacities for adapting to it. The conceptual model of OPAC has been hardly modified recently, and for interacting with them, users still need to combine the same skills and basic knowledge than at the beginning of its introduction (Borgman, 1986, 2000): a) conceptual knowledge to translate the information need into an appropriate query because of a well-designed mental model of the system, b) semantic and syntactic knowledge to be able to implement that query (access fields, searching type, Boolean logic, etc.) and c) basic technical skills in computing. At present many users have the essential technical skills to make use, with more or less expertise, of a computer. This number is substantially reduced when it is referred to the conceptual, semantic and syntactic knowledge that is necessary to achieve a moderately satisfactory search. An added difficulty arises in subject searching, as users should concrete their unknown information needs in terms that the information retrieval system can understand. Many researches have focused an unskilled searchers' difficulties to enter an effective query. The mental models influence, users assumption about characteristics, structure, contents and operation of the system they interact with have been analysed (Dillon, 2000; Dimitroff, 2000). Another issue that implies difficulties is vocabulary: how to find the right terms to implement a query and to modify it as the case may be. Terminology and expressions characteristics used in searching (Bates, 1993), the match between user terms and the subject headings from the catalog (Carlyle, 1989; Drabensttot, 1996; Drabensttot & Vizine-Goetz, 1994), the incidence of spelling errors (Drabensttot and Weller, 1996; Ferl and Millsap, 1996; Walker and Jones, 1987), users problems
-
Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996)
0.00
0.003313949 = product of:
0.019883694 = sum of:
0.019883694 = product of:
0.03976739 = sum of:
0.03976739 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03976739 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.00
0.003313949 = product of:
0.019883694 = sum of:
0.019883694 = product of:
0.03976739 = sum of:
0.03976739 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03976739 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003)
0.00
0.003313949 = product of:
0.019883694 = sum of:
0.019883694 = product of:
0.03976739 = sum of:
0.03976739 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03976739 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.: Extending the "Explore" user task beyond subject authority data into the linked data sphere (2014)
0.00
0.003313949 = product of:
0.019883694 = sum of:
0.019883694 = product of:
0.03976739 = sum of:
0.03976739 = weight(_text_:22 in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03976739 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
