-
Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009)
0.02
0.017311653 = product of:
0.051934958 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.017043166 = product of:
0.03408633 = sum of:
0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03408633 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 1. 8.2010 12:35:22
- Source
- Semantic digital libraries. Eds.: S.R. Kruk, B. McDaniel
-
Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009)
0.02
0.017311653 = product of:
0.051934958 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.017043166 = product of:
0.03408633 = sum of:
0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03408633 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- b
-
Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009)
0.02
0.017311653 = product of:
0.051934958 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.017043166 = product of:
0.03408633 = sum of:
0.03408633 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03408633 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Type
- b
-
Vander Wal, T.: Welcome to the Matrix! (2008)
0.01
0.011541101 = product of:
0.034623303 = sum of:
0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023261193 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.011362111 = product of:
0.022724222 = sum of:
0.022724222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022724222 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 9:15:45
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
-
Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010)
0.01
0.006853395 = product of:
0.04112037 = sum of:
0.04112037 = weight(_text_:b in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04112037 = score(doc=4171,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Lin, N.; Li, D.; Ding, Y.; He, B.; Qin, Z.; Tang, J.; Li, J.; Dong, T.: ¬The dynamic features of Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube (2012)
0.01
0.006853395 = product of:
0.04112037 = sum of:
0.04112037 = weight(_text_:b in 4970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04112037 = score(doc=4970,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 4970, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4970)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This article investigates the dynamic features of social tagging vocabularies in Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube from 2003 to 2008. Three algorithms are designed to study the macro- and micro-tag growth as well as the dynamics of taggers' activities, respectively. Moreover, we propose a Tagger Tag Resource Latent Dirichlet Allocation (TTR-LDA) model to explore the evolution of topics emerging from those social vocabularies. Our results show that (a) at the macro level, tag growth in all the three tagging systems obeys power law distribution with exponents lower than 1; at the micro level, the tag growth of popular resources in all three tagging systems follows a similar power law distribution; (b) the exponents of tag growth vary in different evolving stages of resources; (c) the growth of number of taggers associated with different popular resources presents a feature of convergence over time; (d) the active level of taggers has a positive correlation with the macro-tag growth of different tagging systems; and (e) some topics evolve into several subtopics over time while others experience relatively stable stages in which their contents do not change much, and certain groups of taggers continue their interests in them.
-
Xu, C.; Ma, B.; Chen, X.; Ma, F.: Social tagging in the scholarly world (2013)
0.01
0.006853395 = product of:
0.04112037 = sum of:
0.04112037 = weight(_text_:b in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04112037 = score(doc=1091,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The number of research studies on social tagging has increased rapidly in the past years, but few of them highlight the characteristics and research trends in social tagging. A set of 862 academic documents relating to social tagging and published from 2005 to 2011 was thus examined using bibliometric analysis as well as the social network analysis technique. The results show that social tagging, as a research area, develops rapidly and attracts an increasing number of new entrants. There are no key authors, publication sources, or research groups that dominate the research domain of social tagging. Research on social tagging appears to focus mainly on the following three aspects: (a) components and functions of social tagging (e.g., tags, tagging objects, and tagging network), (b) taggers' behaviors and interface design, and (c) tags' organization and usage in social tagging. The trend suggest that more researchers turn to the latter two integrated with human computer interface and information retrieval, although the first aspect is the fundamental one in social tagging. Also, more studies relating to social tagging pay attention to multimedia tagging objects and not only text tagging. Previous research on social tagging was limited to a few subject domains such as information science and computer science. As an interdisciplinary research area, social tagging is anticipated to attract more researchers from different disciplines. More practical applications, especially in high-tech companies, is an encouraging research trend in social tagging.
-
Kuchler, T.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Zimmermann, V.: Social Tagging and Open Content : a concept for the future of e-learning and knowledge management? (2008)
0.01
0.0058152988 = product of:
0.03489179 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 2892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=2892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 2892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2892)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
-
Golbeck, J.; Koepfler, J.; Emmerling, B.: ¬An experimental study of social tagging behavior and image content (2011)
0.01
0.0058152988 = product of:
0.03489179 = sum of:
0.03489179 = weight(_text_:b in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489179 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.23486741 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.: Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr (2010)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Estrada, L.M.; Hildebrand, M.; Boer, V. de; Ossenbruggen, J. van: Time-based tags for fiction movies : comparing experts to novices using a video labeling game (2017)
0.00
0.0048460825 = product of:
0.029076494 = sum of:
0.029076494 = weight(_text_:b in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029076494 = score(doc=3347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The cultural heritage sector has embraced social tagging as a way to increase both access to online content and to engage users with their digital collections. In this article, we build on two current lines of research. (a) We use Waisda?, an existing labeling game, to add time-based annotations to content. (b) In this context, we investigate the role of experts in human-based computation (nichesourcing). We report on a small-scale experiment in which we applied Waisda? to content from film archives. We study the differences in the type of time-based tags between experts and novices for film clips in a crowdsourcing setting. The findings show high similarity in the number and type of tags (mostly factual). In the less frequent tags, however, experts used more domain-specific terms. We conclude that competitive games are not suited to elicit real expert-level descriptions. We also confirm that providing guidelines, based on conceptual frameworks that are more suited to moving images in a time-based fashion, could result in increasing the quality of the tags, thus allowing for creating more tag-based innovative services for online audiovisual heritage.
-
Naderi, H.; Rumpler, B.: PERCIRS: a system to combine personalized and collaborative information retrieval (2010)
0.00
0.0038768656 = product of:
0.023261193 = sum of:
0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023261193 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009)
0.00
0.0038768656 = product of:
0.023261193 = sum of:
0.023261193 = weight(_text_:b in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023261193 = score(doc=4203,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
-
Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005)
0.00
0.0033922575 = product of:
0.020353545 = sum of:
0.020353545 = weight(_text_:b in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020353545 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14855953 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.13700598 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.00
0.003347594 = product of:
0.020085564 = sum of:
0.020085564 = product of:
0.040171128 = sum of:
0.040171128 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040171128 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.00
0.0023671067 = product of:
0.014202639 = sum of:
0.014202639 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028405279 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008)
0.00
0.0023671067 = product of:
0.014202639 = sum of:
0.014202639 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028405279 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.00
0.0023671067 = product of:
0.014202639 = sum of:
0.014202639 = product of:
0.028405279 = sum of:
0.028405279 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028405279 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1468348 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041930884 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
