-
Andrew, P.G.; Larsgaard, M.L.: Introduction (1999)
0.01
0.0060245167 = product of:
0.015061291 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 5322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=5322,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5322, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5322)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 5322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=5322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5322)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This introduction gives an overview of the contents of the issue, and includes a list of articles for which no writer could be found. The volume begins with preliminary information (acronyms used; a fixed field crosswalk table between MARC 21, OCLC, and RLIN; and a MARC tag table). The first article looks closely at survey results on map cataloging activities. However, its focus is six articles on cataloging specific material types (maps generally; map series and serials; globes; geologic sections; atlases; and aerial photographs and remote-sensing images).
- Type
- a
-
Andrew, P.G.: Cataloging the contemporary printed atlas (1999)
0.01
0.005948606 = product of:
0.014871514 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 5327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=5327,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5327, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5327)
0.0066981306 = product of:
0.013396261 = sum of:
0.013396261 = weight(_text_:information in 5327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013396261 = score(doc=5327,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5327, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Creating a bibliographic description for a contemporary atlas is perhaps more easily understood if one first gives consideration to what an atlas is. It is important to know that this article deals with cartographic atlases as opposed to atlases that focus on, e.g., the anatomy of human or other bodies, or of other types such as those about minerals. Of primary consideration is that cartographic atlases are first and foremost a means of displaying graphic information about the Earth's or other celestial body's surface and/or subsurface, with the physical nature of the item following in relevance when describing the item in hand. Following an overview of what defines an atlas this paper will serve to give the cataloger who has little or no experience with this format of cartographic information guidelines towards which fields are critical to its proper description and, therefore, its accuracy of retrieval.
- Type
- a
-
Andrew, P.G.: ¬A survey technique for map collection retrospective conversion projects (1999)
0.00
0.004915534 = product of:
0.012288835 = sum of:
0.008341924 = weight(_text_:a in 5339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008341924 = score(doc=5339,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 5339, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5339)
0.003946911 = product of:
0.007893822 = sum of:
0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 5339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007893822 = score(doc=5339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Although much has been written about the need for, methodologies, costs, and other aspects of retrospective conversion little exists in the literature regarding retrospective conversion of cartographic materials, and map collections specifically. Reference is usually made to the need to survey the collection for conversion, but the author was unable to locate a description of a random sampling technique that explains how it is applied and what the outcome was. This article introduces the use of a random sampling technique with a major university map collection. The University of Georgia's Maps Collection was surveyed to ascertain how much of the existing maps card catalog needed to be converted to an electronic form for use in the local online public access catalog. In addition, the samples pulled from the survey were searched against the OCLC union catalog to determine the proportions of records that could be found in OCLC and loaded into the Georgia Libraries Information Network (GALIN), the online catalog, with no cataloging intervention versus the degree to which the maps cataloger would have to either adjust existing records available or create original records for the online catalog.
- Type
- a
