Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Brooks, T.A."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Brooks, T.A.: Private acts and public objects : an investigation of citer motivations (1985) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36(1985), S.223-229
    Type
    a
  2. Brooks, T.A.: Evidence of complex citer motivation (1986) 0.01
    0.008234787 = product of:
      0.020586967 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=650)
        0.011051352 = product of:
          0.022102704 = sum of:
            0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022102704 = score(doc=650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.34-36
    Type
    a
  3. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.01
    0.0074442835 = product of:
      0.018610708 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=4593,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.009472587 = product of:
          0.018945174 = sum of:
            0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018945174 = score(doc=4593,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.5, S.485-486
    Type
    a