Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Cheng, Y."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Xie, J.; Lu, H.; Kang, L.; Cheng, Y.: Citing criteria and its effects on researcher's intention to cite : a mixed-method study (2022) 0.01
    0.007891519 = product of:
      0.019728797 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=634,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 634, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=634)
        0.010590675 = product of:
          0.02118135 = sum of:
            0.02118135 = weight(_text_:information in 634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02118135 = score(doc=634,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 634, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study explored users' criteria for citation decisions and investigated the effects on users' intention to cite using a mixed-method approach. A qualitative study was conducted first, where 16 citing criteria were identified based on interviews and inductive analysis. The findings were then used to develop hypotheses and extend the information adoption model. A questionnaire was designed to collect data from users in Chinese universities to test the research model. The findings indicated that pleasure, topicality, and functionality significantly increased users' perceived information usefulness, while familiarity and accessibility significantly enhanced users' perceived ease of use. Information usefulness and information ease of use further contributed to users' intention to cite with adjusted R2 equaling 44.6%. It is also found that perceived academic quality based on 5 antecedents (i.e., reliability, comprehensiveness, novelty, author credibility, and source reputation) significantly increased users' pleasure. Implications and limitations were provided.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.8, S.1079-1091
    Type
    a