-
Cronin, B.: Brian Vickery : an appreciation (2010)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.850-851
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The intelligence disconnect (2011)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4930)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 4930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=4930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1867-1868
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: Don't confuse accreditation with reputation (2011)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=4931,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2299-2300
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The resilience of rejected manuscripts (2012)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.1903-1904
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: Metrics à la mode (2013)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1091
- Type
- a
-
Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995)
0.01
0.007909955 = product of:
0.019774888 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=1825,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.011601503 = product of:
0.023203006 = sum of:
0.023203006 = weight(_text_:information in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023203006 = score(doc=1825,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
- Source
- Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85
- Type
- a
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)
0.01
0.007675537 = product of:
0.019188842 = sum of:
0.01129502 = weight(_text_:a in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01129502 = score(doc=244,freq=22.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.007893822 = product of:
0.015787644 = sum of:
0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015787644 = score(doc=244,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.997-1016
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The sociological turn in information science (2009)
0.01
0.0074575767 = product of:
0.018643942 = sum of:
0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00770594 = score(doc=3655,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
0.010938003 = product of:
0.021876005 = sum of:
0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021876005 = score(doc=3655,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the history of 'the social' in information science. It traces the influence of social scientific thinking on the development of the field's intellectual base. The continuing appropriation of both theoretical and methodological insights from domains such as social studies of science, science and technology studies, and socio-technical systems is discussed.
- Source
- Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.; Overfeldt, K.; Fouchereaux, K.; Manzvanzvike, T.; Cha, M.; Sona, E.: ¬The Internet and competitive intelligence : a survey of current practice (1994)
0.01
0.0073474604 = product of:
0.01836865 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=529,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=529,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The Internet has the potential to become a major strategic information tool for commercial enterprises. many companies, large and small, are already using the Internet to gain an edge in an increasingly competitive business environment, both domestically and internationally. It may well be that the Internet is the next major phase in the evolution of the competitive intelligence function in advanced organizations, especially as commercialization of the network intensifies. Describes an exploratory study of business use of the Internet for competitive intelligence purposes
- Source
- International journal of information management. 14(1994) no.3, S.204-222
- Type
- a
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001)
0.01
0.0072560436 = product of:
0.01814011 = sum of:
0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012614433 = score(doc=6031,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=6031,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.770-773
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The ties that (no longer) bind (2015)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2397-2398
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002)
0.01
0.006654713 = product of:
0.016636781 = sum of:
0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00770594 = score(doc=1263,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=1263,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The accrual of symbolic capital is an important aspect of academic life. Successful capital formation is commonly signified by the trappings of scholarly distinction or acknowledged status as a public intellectual. We consider and compare three potential indices of symbolic capital: citation counts, Web hits, and media mentions. Our Eindings, which are domain specific, suggest that public intellectuals are notable by their absence within the information studies community.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1267-1270
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993)
0.01
0.006474727 = product of:
0.016186817 = sum of:
0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010661141 = score(doc=7827,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=7827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Learned Information
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: ¬A cast of thousands : Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003)
0.01
0.006474727 = product of:
0.016186817 = sum of:
0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010661141 = score(doc=1731,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=1731,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th-century scholarship by analyzing and classifying more than 4,500 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that the intensity of acknowledgment varies by discipline, reflecting differences in prevailing sociocognitive structures and work practices. We demonstrate that the acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing, one that provides a revealing insight into the nature and extent of subauthorship collaboration. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of collaboration and the increasing division of labor in contemporary research and scholarship.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.9, S.855-871
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004)
0.01
0.006474727 = product of:
0.016186817 = sum of:
0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010661141 = score(doc=2094,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.2, S.160-168
- Type
- a
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: Biobibliometric profiling : an examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship (2012)
0.01
0.0064290287 = product of:
0.016072571 = sum of:
0.008258085 = weight(_text_:a in 4991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008258085 = score(doc=4991,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4991, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4991)
0.007814486 = product of:
0.015628971 = sum of:
0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 4991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015628971 = score(doc=4991,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4991, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We conducted a fine-grained prosopography of six distinguished information scientists to explore commonalities and differences in their approaches to scholarly production at different stages of their careers. Specifically, we gathered data on authors' genre preferences, rates and modes of scholarly production, and coauthorship patterns. We also explored the role played by gender and place in determining mentoring and collaboration practices across time. Our biobibliometric profiles of the sextet reveal the different shapes a scholar's career can take. We consider the implications of our findings for new entrants into the academic marketplace.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.450-468
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: Tiered citation and measures of document similarity (1994)
0.01
0.0063011474 = product of:
0.015752869 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 7773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=7773,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 7773, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7773)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 7773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=7773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The degree of similarity netween pairs of cited and citing documents is frequently small. One factor may be the ways in which authors draw upon and cite the work of others. The idea of tiered, or multilayered, citation is proposed as a means of testing this hypothesis. A tentative citation typology is outlined
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.7, S.537-538
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: Hyperauthorship : a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)
0.01
0.0060245167 = product of:
0.015061291 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=5909,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Classical assumptions about the nature and ethical entailments of authorship (the standard model) are being challenged by developments in scientific collaboration and multiple authorship. In the biomedical research community, multiple authorship has increased to such an extent that the trustworthiness of the scientific communication system has been called into question. Documented abuses, such as honorific authorship, have serious implications in terms of the acknowledgment of authority, allocation of credit, and assigning of accountability. Within the biomedical world it has been proposed that authors be replaced by lists of contributors (the radical model), whose specific inputs to a given study would be recorded unambiguously. The wider implications of the 'hyperauthorship' phenomenon for scholarly publication are considered
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.7, S.558-569
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004)
0.01
0.005751905 = product of:
0.014379762 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.557-560
- Theme
- Information
- Type
- a
-
Cronin, B.: Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science (2001)
0.01
0.005751905 = product of:
0.014379762 = sum of:
0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005448922 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=4488,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Data were gathered on acknowledgements in five leading information science journals for the years 1991-1999. The results were compared with data from two earlier studies of the same journals. Analysis of the aggregate data (1971-1999) confirms the general impression that acknowledgement has become an institutionalised element of the scholarly communication process, reflecting the growing cognitive and structural complexity of contemporary research.
- Type
- a
