-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.03
0.0341686 = product of:
0.0854215 = sum of:
0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068111527 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.07861035 = sum of:
0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015787644 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.06282271 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06282271 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A universal method of information retrieval evaluation : the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface (2004)
0.03
0.0252955 = product of:
0.06323875 = sum of:
0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009138121 = score(doc=2558,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.054100625 = sum of:
0.016407004 = weight(_text_:information in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016407004 = score(doc=2558,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.037693623 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037693623 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The paper shows that the present evaluation methods in information retrieval (basically recall R and precision P and in some cases fallout F ) lack universal comparability in the sense that their values depend on the generality of the IR problem. A solution is given by using all "parts" of the database, including the non-relevant documents and also the not-retrieved documents. It turns out that the solution is given by introducing the measure M being the fraction of the not-retrieved documents that are relevant (hence the "miss" measure). We prove that - independent of the IR problem or of the IR action - the quadruple (P,R,F,M) belongs to a universal IR surface, being the same for all IR-activities. This universality is then exploited by defining a new measure for evaluation in IR allowing for unbiased comparisons of all IR results. We also show that only using one, two or even three measures from the set {P,R,F,M} necessary leads to evaluation measures that are non-universal and hence not capable of comparing different IR situations.
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 19:17:22
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.1, S.21-30
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.023770515 = product of:
0.059426285 = sum of:
0.012260076 = weight(_text_:a in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012260076 = score(doc=7659,freq=18.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.04716621 = sum of:
0.009472587 = weight(_text_:information in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009472587 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.037693623 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037693623 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014)
0.01
0.009831068 = product of:
0.02457767 = sum of:
0.016683849 = weight(_text_:a in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016683849 = score(doc=1508,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3120525 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
0.007893822 = product of:
0.015787644 = sum of:
0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015787644 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- It is shown that a normalized version of the g-index is a good normalized impact and concentration measure. A proposal for such a measure by Bartolucci is improved.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.008874074 = product of:
0.022185184 = sum of:
0.012614433 = weight(_text_:a in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012614433 = score(doc=2157,freq=14.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.009570752 = product of:
0.019141505 = sum of:
0.019141505 = weight(_text_:information in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019141505 = score(doc=2157,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Let (DS, DQ, sim) be a retrieval system consisting of a document space DS, a query space QS, and a function sim, expressing the similarity between a document and a query. Following D.M. Everett and S.C. Cater (1992), we introduce topologies on the document space. These topologies are generated by the similarity function sim and the query space QS. 3 topologies will be studied: the retrieval topology, the similarity topology and the (pseudo-)metric one. It is shown that the retrieval topology is the coarsest of the three, while the (pseudo-)metric is the strongest. These 3 topologies are generally different, reflecting distinct topological aspects of information retrieval. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for these topological aspects to be equal
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.13, S.1144-1160
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Special features of the author - publication relationship and a new explanation of Lotka's law based on convolution theory (1994)
0.01
0.008412599 = product of:
0.021031497 = sum of:
0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01155891 = score(doc=5068,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.6, S.422-427
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013)
0.01
0.008412599 = product of:
0.021031497 = sum of:
0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01155891 = score(doc=683,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A theoretical study of recall and precision using a topological approach to information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.008150326 = product of:
0.020375814 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=3267,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.010938003 = product of:
0.021876005 = sum of:
0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021876005 = score(doc=3267,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Topologies for information retrieval systems are generated by certain subsets, called retrievals. Shows how recall and precision can be expressed using only retrievals. Investigates different types of retrieval systems: both threshold systems and close match systems and both optimal and non optimal retrieval. Highlights the relation with the hypergeometric and some non-standard distributions
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) nos.2/3, S.191-218
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Untangling Herdan's law and Heaps' law : mathematical and informetric arguments (2007)
0.01
0.008012165 = product of:
0.020030413 = sum of:
0.014448637 = weight(_text_:a in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014448637 = score(doc=271,freq=36.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27024537 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.0055817757 = product of:
0.011163551 = sum of:
0.011163551 = weight(_text_:information in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011163551 = score(doc=271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Herdan's law in linguistics and Heaps' law in information retrieval are different formulations of the same phenomenon. Stated briefly and in linguistic terms they state that vocabularies' sizes are concave increasing power laws of texts' sizes. This study investigates these laws from a purely mathematical and informetric point of view. A general informetric argument shows that the problem of proving these laws is, in fact, ill-posed. Using the more general terminology of sources and items, the author shows by presenting exact formulas from Lotkaian informetrics that the total number T of sources is not only a function of the total number A of items, but is also a function of several parameters (e.g., the parameters occurring in Lotka's law). Consequently, it is shown that a fixed T(or A) value can lead to different possible A (respectively, T) values. Limiting the T(A)-variability to increasing samples (e.g., in a text as done in linguistics) the author then shows, in a purely mathematical way, that for large sample sizes T~ A**phi, where phi is a constant, phi < 1 but close to 1, hence roughly, Heaps' or Herdan's law can be proved without using any linguistic or informetric argument. The author also shows that for smaller samples, a is not a constant but essentially decreases as confirmed by practical examples. Finally, an exact informetric argument on random sampling in the items shows that, in most cases, T= T(A) is a concavely increasing function, in accordance with practical examples.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.5, S.702-709
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A rationale for the Hirsch-index rank-order distribution and a comparison with the impact factor rank-order distribution (2009)
0.01
0.007931639 = product of:
0.019829098 = sum of:
0.014303422 = weight(_text_:a in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014303422 = score(doc=3124,freq=18.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.26752928 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 3124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=3124,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3124, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3124)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We present a rationale for the Hirsch-index rank-order distribution and prove that it is a power law (hence a straight line in the log-log scale). This is confirmed by experimental data of Pyykkö and by data produced in this article on 206 mathematics journals. This distribution is of a completely different nature than the impact factor (IF) rank-order distribution which (as proved in a previous article) is S-shaped. This is also confirmed by our example. Only in the log-log scale of the h-index distribution do we notice a concave deviation of the straight line for higher ranks. This phenomenon is discussed.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.2142-2144
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007)
0.01
0.007864855 = product of:
0.019662138 = sum of:
0.013347079 = weight(_text_:a in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013347079 = score(doc=147,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- When there are a group of articles and the present time is fixed we can determine the unique number h being the number of articles that received h or more citations while the other articles received a number of citations which is not larger than h. In this article, the time dependence of the h-index is determined. This is important to describe the expected career evolution of a scientist's work or of a journal's production in a fixed year.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.452-454
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009)
0.01
0.007399688 = product of:
0.01849922 = sum of:
0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012184162 = score(doc=6759,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Using a power-law model, the two best-known topics in citation analysis, namely the impact factor and the Hirsch index, are unified into one relation (not a function). The validity of our model is, at least in a qualitative way, confirmed by real data.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: On the relation between the association strength and other similarity measures (2010)
0.01
0.007399688 = product of:
0.01849922 = sum of:
0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012184162 = score(doc=3598,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A graph in van Eck and Waltman [JASIST, 60(8), 2009, p. 1644], representing the relation between the association strength and the cosine, is partially explained as a sheaf of parabolas, each parabola being the functional relation between these similarity measures on the trajectories x*y=a, a constant. Based on earlier obtained relations between cosine and other similarity measures (e.g., Jaccard index), we can prove new relations between the association strength and these other measures.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1502-1504
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : the second special issue (2006)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=7119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=7119,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1405-1407
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : origins and consequences (2005)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=1910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=1910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1311-1316
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: ¬The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index (2008)
0.01
0.0069400403 = product of:
0.0173501 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=1881,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
0.007814486 = product of:
0.015628971 = sum of:
0.015628971 = weight(_text_:information in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015628971 = score(doc=1881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In a previous article, we introduced a general transformation on sources and one on items in an arbitrary information production process (IPP). In this article, we investigate the influence of these transformations on the h-index and on the g-index. General formulae that describe this influence are presented. These are applied to the case that the size-frequency function is Lotkaian (i.e., is a decreasing power function). We further show that the h-index of the transformed IPP belongs to the interval bounded by the two transformations of the h-index of the original IPP, and we also show that this property is not true for the g-index.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.8, S.1304-1312
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000)
0.01
0.0068851607 = product of:
0.017212901 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=4385,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Observed aging curves are influenced by publication delays. In this article, we show how the 'undisturbed' aging function and the publication delay combine to give the observed aging function. This combination is performed by a mathematical operation known as convolution. Examples are given, such as the convolution of 2 Poisson distributions, 2 exponential distributions, a 2 lognormal distributions. A paradox is observed between theory and real data
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008)
0.01
0.0068851607 = product of:
0.017212901 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=695,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.006315058 = product of:
0.012630116 = sum of:
0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012630116 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- An h-type index is proposed which depends on the obtained citations of articles belonging to the h-core. This weighted h-index, denoted as hw, is presented in a continuous setting and in a discrete one. It is shown that in a continuous setting the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the ideal may occur.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.770-780
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Theory of the topical coverage of multiple databases (2013)
0.01
0.0068817483 = product of:
0.01720437 = sum of:
0.011678694 = weight(_text_:a in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011678694 = score(doc=526,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We present a model that describes which fraction of the literature on a certain topic we will find when we use n (n = 1, 2, .) databases. It is a generalization of the theory of discovering usability problems. We prove that, in all practical cases, this fraction is a concave function of n, the number of used databases, thereby explaining some graphs that exist in the literature. We also study limiting features of this fraction for n very high and we characterize the case that we find all literature on a certain topic for n high enough.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.126-131
- Type
- a
