Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"He, D."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020) 0.03
    0.025083167 = product of:
      0.062707916 = sum of:
        0.0076151006 = weight(_text_:a in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076151006 = score(doc=34,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
        0.05509282 = sum of:
          0.023681467 = weight(_text_:information in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023681467 = score(doc=34,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
          0.031411353 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031411353 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16237405 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046368346 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    For laypeople, searching online health information resources can be challenging due to topic complexity and the large number of online sources with differing quality. The goal of this article is to examine, among all the available online sources, which online sources laypeople select to address their health-related information needs, and whether or how much the severity of a health condition influences their selection. Twenty-four participants were recruited individually, and each was asked (using a retrieval system called HIS) to search for information regarding a severe health condition and a mild health condition, respectively. The selected online health information sources were automatically captured by the HIS system and classified at both the website and webpage levels. Participants' selection behavior patterns were then plotted across the whole information-seeking process. Our results demonstrate that laypeople's source selection fluctuates during the health information-seeking process, and also varies by the severity of health conditions. This study reveals laypeople's real usage of different types of online health information sources, and engenders implications to the design of search engines, as well as the development of health literacy programs.
    Date
    12.11.2020 13:22:09
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.12, S.1484-1499
    Type
    a
  2. Xie, B.; He, D.; Mercer, T.; Wang, Y.; Wu, D.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Zhang, Y.; Yoder, L.H.; Stephens, K.K.; Mackert, M.; Lee, M.K.: Global health crises are also information crises : a call to action (2020) 0.01
    0.009228281 = product of:
      0.0230707 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=32,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
        0.013535086 = product of:
          0.027070172 = sum of:
            0.027070172 = weight(_text_:information in 32) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027070172 = score(doc=32,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 32, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=32)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this opinion paper, we argue that global health crises are also information crises. Using as an example the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, we (a) examine challenges associated with what we term "global information crises"; (b) recommend changes needed for the field of information science to play a leading role in such crises; and (c) propose actionable items for short- and long-term research, education, and practice in information science.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.12, S.1419-1423
    Type
    a
  3. Xiao, F.; Chi, Y.; He, D.: Promoting data use through understanding user behaviors : a model for human open government data interaction (2023) 0.00
    0.0039382176 = product of:
      0.009845544 = sum of:
        0.005898632 = weight(_text_:a in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005898632 = score(doc=1190,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
        0.003946911 = product of:
          0.007893822 = sum of:
            0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007893822 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in: JASIST special issue on 'Who tweets scientific publications? A large-scale study of tweeting audiences in all areas of research'. Vgl.: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24831.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.13, S.1498-1514
    Type
    a