Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
sbss%3a%22Pub A 91 %2f information%22 4

Jones, E.A.: Death of a cataloguing code : Seymour Lubetzky's code of cataloging rules and the question of institutions (1996) 0.00

0.0024368323 = product of:
  0.012184162 = sum of:
    0.012184162 = weight(_text_:a in 4433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012184162 = score(doc=4433,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4433, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4433)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
Type: a

Jones, E.A.: Multiple versions revisited (1997) 0.00

0.0021795689 = product of:
  0.010897844 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=906,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract: The entity-relationship model in the IFLA draft 'Functional requirements of bibliographic records' (FRBR) provides a useful mechanism for reexamining the multiple-versions problem in serials cataloguing. However, along with the increase in usefulness afforded by the FRBR model comes an inevitable increase in ambiguity regarding what constitutes a version within the model, and at what level of that model, and ultimately what constitutes a work
Type: a

Jones, E.A.: In search of UBC : s study in the convergence of practice between the Library of Congress and the other ABACUS libraries (1997) 0.00
```
0.0016683849 = product of:
  0.008341924 = sum of:
    0.008341924 = weight(_text_:a in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008341924 = score(doc=1093,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Reports results of a comparative analysis of choice and form of main entry in the monograph cataloguing of the LoC and that of the British Library and the national libraries of Canada and Australia in 1982 and 1989, to examine the level and kind of consistency achieved in Anglo-American descriptive cataloguing. The overall aim of the project was to investigate the achievement of UBC and the implicit idea that bibliographic records created by the national bibliographic agency (NBA) of one country should be acceptable, without modification, to the NBAs of other countries. Part 2 provides an analysis of patternsaffecting the form of main entry headings (personal and corporate names), choice and form of uniform titles and titles proper, and miscellaneous descriptive cataloguing elements. These steps are intended to lead to a common MARC format, a common file of authority records, and, ultimately, a common file of bibliographic records for the cataloguing agencies of the major English speaking countries. concludes that Barbara Tillett's vision of 1 seamless bibliographic system, either real or virtual, looks realizable over a 5 to 10 year horizon

Type

a
Jones, E.A.: In search of UBC : s study in the convergence of practice between the Library of Congress and the other ABACUS libraries (1997) 0.00
```
0.0014156717 = product of:
  0.007078358 = sum of:
    0.007078358 = weight(_text_:a in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007078358 = score(doc=490,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Reports results of a comparative analysis of choice and form of main entry in the monograph cataloguing of the LoC and that of the British Library and the national libraries of Canada and Australia in 1982 and 1989, examining the extent to which LoC practice and that of the other agencies was consistent and, when it was not, the apparent reasons for the inconsistency. The overall aim of the project was to investigate the achievement of UBC and the implicit idea that bibliographic records created by the national bibliographic agency (NBA) of one country should be acceptable, without modification, the NBAs of other countries. Part 1 provides a general introduction and background to the study, which set out to measure the degree of consistency achieved by the LoC and Association of Bibliographic Agencies of Australia, Britain, Canada and the USA (ABACUS) NBAs is assigning main entries to books catalogued, along with an analysis of broad patterns and patterns affecting the choice of main entry

Type

a