Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Keen, E.M."
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Keen, E.M.: Aspects of computer-based indexing languages (1991) 0.05 
    0.053983875 = product of:
  0.13495968 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 5072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=5072,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5072, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5072)
    0.12725374 = weight(_text_:91 in 5072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12725374 = score(doc=5072,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.49251786 = fieldWeight in 5072, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5072)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Comments on the relative rarity of research articles on theoretical aspects of subject indexing in computerised retrieval systems and the predominance of articles on software packages and hardware. Concludes that controlled indexing still has a future but points to major differences from the past
    Source
    Computers in libraries international 91. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Computers in Libraries, London, February 1991
    Type
    a
  2. Keen, E.M.: Laboratory tests of manual systems (1981) 0.01 
    0.009411185 = product of:
  0.023527961 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
    0.012630116 = product of:
      0.025260232 = sum of:
        0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025260232 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Information retrieval experiment. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones
    Type
    a
  3. Keen, E.M.: Some aspects of proximity searching in text retrieval systems (1992) 0.01 
    0.0063011474 = product of:
  0.015752869 = sum of:
    0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 6190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009437811 = score(doc=6190,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 6190, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6190)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 6190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=6190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes and evaluates the proximity search facilities in external online systems and in-house retrieval software. Discusses and illustrates capabilities, syntax and circumstances of use. Presents measurements of the overheads required by proximity for storage, record input time and search time. The search strategy narrowing effect of proximity is illustrated by recall and precision test results. Usage and problems lead to a number of design ideas for better implementation: some based on existing Boolean strategies, one on the use of weighted proximity to automatically produce ranked output. A comparison of Boolean, quorum and proximate term pairs distance is included
    Source
    Journal of information science. 18(1992), S.89-98
    Type
    a
  4. Keen, E.M.; Hartley, R.J.: Phrase processing in text retrieval (1994) 0.00 
    0.0010897844 = product of:
  0.005448922 = sum of:
    0.005448922 = weight(_text_:a in 1316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005448922 = score(doc=1316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1316)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Type
    a

Years

Themes