Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Malone, L.C."
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Malone, L.C.; Driscoll, J.R.; Pepe, J.W.: Modeling the performance of an automated keywording system (1991) 0.01 
    0.0063011474 = product of:
  0.015752869 = sum of:
    0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009437811 = score(doc=6682,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=6682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Presents a model for predicting the performance of a computerised keyword assigning and indexing system. Statistical procedures were investigated in order to protect against incorrect keywording by the system behaving as an expert system designed to mimic the behaviour of human keyword indexers and representing lessons learned from military exercises and operations
    Source
    Information processing and management. 27(1991) nos.2/3, S.145-151
    Type
    a
  2. Malone, L.C.; Wildman-Pepe, J.; Driscoll, J.R.: Evaluation of an automated keywording system (1990) 0.01 
    0.005898641 = product of:
  0.014746603 = sum of:
    0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0100103095 = score(doc=4999,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
    0.0047362936 = product of:
      0.009472587 = sum of:
        0.009472587 = weight(_text_:information in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009472587 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    An automated keywording system has been designed ro artifically behave as a human "expert" indexer. The system was designed to keyword 100 to 800 word documents representing lessons learned from military exercises and operations. A set of 74 documents can be keyworded on an IBM PS/2 model 80 in about five minutes. This paper presents a variety of ways for statistical documenting improvements in the development of an automated keywording system over time. It is not only beneficial to have some measure of system performance for a given time, but it is also useful as attemps are made to improve a system to assess if actual statistically significant improvements have been made. Furthermore, it is useful to identify the source of any existing problems so that they can be rectified. The specifics of the automated system that was evaluated are described, and the performance measures used are discussed.
    Source
    Microcomputers for information management. 7(1990) no. 2, S.127-148
    Type
    a

Authors