Search (32 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Rada, R."
  1. You, G.-N:; Rada, R.: ¬A systematic approach to outline manipulation (1994) 0.00
    0.0032693536 = product of:
      0.016346768 = sum of:
        0.016346768 = weight(_text_:a in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016346768 = score(doc=2010,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines (Tables of contents) reflect a conceptual model and can serve as a cognitive aid in reading and writing hypertext
    Type
    a
  2. Rada, R.; Mili, H.; Bicknell, E.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets (1989) 0.00
    0.0026970792 = product of:
      0.013485395 = sum of:
        0.013485395 = weight(_text_:a in 3917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013485395 = score(doc=3917,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3917, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3917)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Rada, R.: Hypertext writing and document reuse : the role of a semantic net (1990.) 0.00
    0.002669416 = product of:
      0.013347079 = sum of:
        0.013347079 = weight(_text_:a in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013347079 = score(doc=5911,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    When document components are classified and then recombined during document re-use, a semantic net may serve as the classification language. A theory of analogical inheritance, applied to this semantic net, guides the reorganisation of document components. Authors index paragraphs from various sources with node-link-node triples from a semantic net and then use programs to transverse the semantic net and generate various outlines. The program examines node and link names in deciding which path to take. Describes how these techniques helped in the re-use: parts of an existing book to write a new one
    Type
    a
  4. Mili, H.; Rada, R.: Merging thesauri : principles and evaluation (1988) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=3916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Rada, R.; Bird, G.; Zheng, M.: Hypertext interchange using ICA (1995) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 6806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=6806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6806)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Rada, R.; Barlow, J.; Potharst, J.; Zanstra, P.; Bijstra, D.: Document ranking using an enriched thesaurus (1991) 0.00
    0.0021624742 = product of:
      0.010812371 = sum of:
        0.010812371 = weight(_text_:a in 6626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010812371 = score(doc=6626,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 6626, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6626)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus may be viewed as a graph, and document retrieval algorithms can exploit this graph when both the documents and the query are represented by thesaurus terms. These retrieval algorithms measure the distance between the query and documents by using the path lengths in the graph. Previous work witj such strategies has shown that the hierarchical relations in the thesaurus are useful but the non-hierarchical are not. This paper shows that when the query explicitly mentions a particular non-hierarchical relation, the retrieval algorithm benefits from the presence of such relations in the thesaurus. Our algorithms were applied to the Excerpta Medica bibliographic citation database whose citations are indexed with terms from the EMTREE thesaurus. We also created an enriched EMTREE by systematically adding non-hierarchical relations from a medical knowledge base. Our algorithms used at one time EMTREE and, at another time, the enriched EMTREE in the course of ranking documents from Excerpta Medica against queries. When, and only when, the query specifically mentioned a particular non-hierarchical relation type, did EMTREE enriched with that relation type lead to a ranking that better corresponded to an expert's ranking
    Type
    a
  7. Wang, W.; Rada, R.: Experiences with semantic net based hypermedia (1995) 0.00
    0.002002062 = product of:
      0.0100103095 = sum of:
        0.0100103095 = weight(_text_:a in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0100103095 = score(doc=4540,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Many Using and Creating Hypermedia (MUCH) systems is based on the Dexter model and treats the storage layer as a semantic net. The MUCH system provides a numer of recommended link types for representing application domain concepts, such as thesauri, documents and annotations. users of the system are expected to use those link types in the course of authoring meaningful hypermedia. based on the logs of usage of the MUCH system over 2 years by over 200 people, contrary to the designers' expectations, users did not exploit the ability to type semantic links. Typically authors used the default link type regardless of their semantic intentions. When a link type other than the default type was chosen, that choice was often inconsistent with the way another user would able a similar link. The system has proven to be useful for authoring conventional documents. Authors, however, were not practically able to produce hypertext documents. Based on these experiences a new system, RICH (Reusable Intelligent Collaborative Hypermedia), has been designed and built which emphasizes rules for typing links and maintaining the integrity of the semantic net
    Type
    a
  8. Rada, R.; You, G.-N.: Balanced outlines and hypertext (1992) 0.00
    0.0019071229 = product of:
      0.009535614 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=2363,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Navigation problems in a hypertext migth be reduced, if mutiple, coherent views of the hypertext were available. Document outlines help readers appreciate the structure and meaning of the document. Proposes measures of syntactic and lexical balance in an outline and show in a sample of documents the degree to which these balances occur. Based on balance in an outline, a method for semi-automatically generating an alternative outline is applied to one textbook. The textbook with both its original and its alternative outline is availbale in hypertext, and subjects who were asked to evaluate this hypertext noted that the alternative outline would help readers compare concepts in the textbook
    Type
    a
  9. Chen, C.; Rada, R.: ¬A conceptual model for supporting collaborative authoring and use (1994) 0.00
    0.0019071229 = product of:
      0.009535614 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 7554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=7554,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7554, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7554)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses some problems encountered in hypermedia-based collaboration and reuse, and presents a conceptual framework to resolve these problems. Three suggestions are made based on the discussion: (1) extra organizational structures are necessary in shared hypermedia to support collaborative interactions; (2) an abstract schema is a key to capture the dynamic nature of the shared hypermedia; (3) an integration of the schema evolution approach and the workflow approach is recommended for an open system hypermedia teamwork support. The whole authoring environment is divided into several component spaces with particular respect to the Dexter Hypertext Reference Model. Not only can this separation reduce the overall complexitiy of working within such an environment, but it also conforms more closely with human cognitive needs in collaborative authoring and reuse activities
    Type
    a
  10. Rada, R.; Murphy, C.: Searching verses browsing in hypertext (1992) 0.00
    0.0018875621 = product of:
      0.009437811 = sum of:
        0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009437811 = score(doc=3317,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Attemps to elaborate the relationships among tasks, user types, and tools for hypertext. A computer system was built for automatically converting books into hypertext and one book converts into Emaccs-Info, Guide, HyperTies, and a variant of SuperBook, called MaxiBook. Compares the performance of 3 classes of users - expers, novices and trainees - with different tasks on these different delivery vehicles, the tasks involving one search question and one browse question
    Type
    a
  11. Rada, R.; Mili, H.; Letourneau, G.; Johnston, D.: Creating and evaluating entry terms (1988) 0.00
    0.001541188 = product of:
      0.00770594 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=704,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 704, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=704)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An indexing language is made more accessible to searchers and indexers by the presence of entry terms or near-synonyms. This paper first presents an evaluation of existing entry terms and then presents and tests a strategy for creating entry terms. The key tools in the evaluation of the entry terms are documents already indexed into the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and an automatic indexer ...
    Type
    a
  12. Rada, R.: ¬The GALEN dream (1992) 0.00
    0.0013622305 = product of:
      0.0068111527 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 4251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=4251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4251)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a