Fischer, D.H.; Möhr, W.; Rostek, L.: ¬A modular, object-oriented and generic approach for building terminology maintenance systems (1996)
0.01
0.0065180818 = product of:
0.016295204 = sum of:
0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01155891 = score(doc=6345,freq=16.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
0.0047362936 = product of:
0.009472587 = sum of:
0.009472587 = weight(_text_:information in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009472587 = score(doc=6345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Five years ago, we raised the question: is there a data model which is general enough such that all existing thesauri can be represented by a specialization of this general model without loss of information? The answer was not given at that time, but we referred to the principle of abstraction, well supported in object-oriented data modelling. We gained the empirical basis for that process of abstraction by modelling existing thesauri and a terminological dictionary; an abstracting view was afterwards presented in a paper to the TKE'93 conference. The present paper reports on a third step of abstraction with its very concrete consequences, embodies in a software called TerminologyFramework(TFw)
- Type
- a