-
Sparck Jones, K.; Jackson, D.M.: ¬The use of automatically obtained keyword classification for information retrieval (1970)
0.01
0.01150381 = product of:
0.028759524 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
0.017861681 = product of:
0.035723362 = sum of:
0.035723362 = weight(_text_:information in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035723362 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 5(1970), S.175-201
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The role of artificial intelligence in information retrieval (1991)
0.01
0.011042367 = product of:
0.027605917 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=4811,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
0.016708074 = product of:
0.03341615 = sum of:
0.03341615 = weight(_text_:information in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03341615 = score(doc=4811,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a view of the scope of artificial intelligence (AI) in information retrieval (IR). Considers potential roles of AI and IR, evaluating AI from a realistic point od view and within a wide information management potential, not just because AI is itself insufficiently developed, but because many information management tasks are properly shallow information processing ones. There is nevertheless an important place for specific applications of AI or AI-derived technology when particular constraints can be placed on the information management tasks involved
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991) no.8, S.558-565
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Walker, S.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A probabilistic model of information retrieval : development and comparative experiments - part 1 (2000)
0.01
0.009982069 = product of:
0.024955172 = sum of:
0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01155891 = score(doc=4181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
0.013396261 = product of:
0.026792523 = sum of:
0.026792523 = weight(_text_:information in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026792523 = score(doc=4181,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.6, S.779-808
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Walker, S.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A probabilistic model of information retrieval : development and comparative experiments - part 2 (2000)
0.01
0.009982069 = product of:
0.024955172 = sum of:
0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01155891 = score(doc=4286,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
0.013396261 = product of:
0.026792523 = sum of:
0.026792523 = weight(_text_:information in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026792523 = score(doc=4286,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.6, S.809-840
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Index term weighting (1973)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.619-633
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Retrieval system tests 1958-1978 (1981)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information retrieval experiment. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The Cranfield tests (1981)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 3157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=3157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3157)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 3157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=3157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information retrieval experiments. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones
- Type
- a
-
Kay, M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Automated language processing (1971)
0.01
0.009411185 = product of:
0.023527961 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.012630116 = product of:
0.025260232 = sum of:
0.025260232 = weight(_text_:information in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025260232 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 6(1971), S.141-166
- Type
- a
-
Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976)
0.01
0.008734339 = product of:
0.021835847 = sum of:
0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010897844 = score(doc=71,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.010938003 = product of:
0.021876005 = sum of:
0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021876005 = score(doc=71,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979)
0.01
0.008627858 = product of:
0.021569645 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
0.013396261 = product of:
0.026792523 = sum of:
0.026792523 = weight(_text_:information in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026792523 = score(doc=1939,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.
- Type
- a
-
Lewis, D.D.; Sparck Jones, K.: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.008234787 = product of:
0.020586967 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
0.011051352 = product of:
0.022102704 = sum of:
0.022102704 = weight(_text_:information in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022102704 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Type
- a
-
Lewis, D.D.; Sparck Jones, K.: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1997)
0.01
0.0073474604 = product of:
0.01836865 = sum of:
0.009437811 = weight(_text_:a in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009437811 = score(doc=575,freq=6.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=575,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Imprint
- The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
- Source
- From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Fashionable trends and feasible strategies in information management (1988)
0.01
0.0073211575 = product of:
0.018302893 = sum of:
0.004767807 = weight(_text_:a in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004767807 = score(doc=817,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
0.013535086 = product of:
0.027070172 = sum of:
0.027070172 = weight(_text_:information in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027070172 = score(doc=817,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article analyzes current trends in information management, considers the problems they involve, and suggests some strategies for tackling these problems. The current goal is integrated, personalized information systems, to be reached via artificial intelligence. The argument is that the extent to which this goal can be achieved is limited because these systems are intrinsically heterogeneous, are for access to information, and deal in linguistically expressed information; so the best strategy for building the systems that can be attained is via linguisticallay oriented knowledge and inference. Evaluating these systems also presents problems because each use is unique, but evaluation is much needed and large-sample strategies for performance study can be devised.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.703-711
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Metareflections on TREC (2005)
0.01
0.007058388 = product of:
0.01764597 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC : TREC-2 (1995)
0.01
0.006654713 = product of:
0.016636781 = sum of:
0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00770594 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
0.0089308405 = product of:
0.017861681 = sum of:
0.017861681 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017861681 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Discusses the TREC programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within it in terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.291-314
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC (1997)
0.01
0.006550755 = product of:
0.016376887 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=580,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.008203502 = product of:
0.016407004 = sum of:
0.016407004 = weight(_text_:information in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016407004 = score(doc=580,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the Text REtrieval Conferences (TREC) programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within its terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck aus: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.192-314
- Imprint
- The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
- Source
- From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (2005)
0.01
0.006540462 = product of:
0.016351154 = sum of:
0.010769378 = weight(_text_:a in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010769378 = score(doc=4392,freq=20.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.0055817757 = product of:
0.011163551 = sum of:
0.011163551 = weight(_text_:information in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011163551 = score(doc=4392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper was originally published in 1970 (Journal of documentation. 26(1970), S.89-101), considered the suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically and raised some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which were required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties had not been sufficiently considered, and the paper, therefore, aims to attempt an analysis of them, though no solutions of immediate application could be suggested. Design/methodology/approach - Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. Findings - Since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precise statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and, since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them. Originality/value - Gives insights into the classification of material for information retrieval.
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.; Jones, G.J.F.; Foote, J.T.; Young, S.J.: Experiments in spoken document retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.006474727 = product of:
0.016186817 = sum of:
0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010661141 = score(doc=1951,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Describes experiments in the retrieval of spoken documents in multimedia systems. Speech documents pose a particular problem for retrieval since their words as well as contents are unknown. Addresses this problem, for a video mail application, by combining state of the art speech recognition with established document retrieval technologies so as to provide an effective and efficient retrieval tool. Tests with a small spoken message collection show that retrieval precision for the spoken file can reach 90% of that obtained when the same file is used, as a benchmark, in text transcription form
- Source
- Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.4, S.399-417
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Revisiting classification for retrieval (2005)
0.01
0.006474727 = product of:
0.016186817 = sum of:
0.010661141 = weight(_text_:a in 4328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010661141 = score(doc=4328,freq=10.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4328, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4328)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 4328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=4328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4328)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This short note seeks to respond to Hjørland and Pederson's paper "A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval" which starts from Sparck Jones's, "Some thoughts on classification for retrieval", originally published in 1970. Design/methodology/approach - The note comments on the context in which the 1970 paper was written, and on Hjørland and Pedersen's views, emphasising the need for well-grounded classification theory and application. Findings - The note maintains that text-based, a posteriori, classification, as increasingly found in applications, is likely to be more useful, in general, than a priori classification. Originality/value - The note elaborates on points made in a well-received earlier paper.
- Type
- a
-
Sparck Jones, K.: Some thoughts on classification for retrieval (1970)
0.01
0.005886516 = product of:
0.01471629 = sum of:
0.010769378 = weight(_text_:a in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010769378 = score(doc=4327,freq=20.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.003946911 = product of:
0.007893822 = sum of:
0.007893822 = weight(_text_:information in 4327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007893822 = score(doc=4327,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4327, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4327)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The suggestion that classifications for retrieval should be constructed automatically raises some serious problems concerning the sorts of classification which are required, and the way in which formal classification theories should be exploited, given that a retrieval classification is required for a purpose. These difficulties have not been sufficiently considered, and the paper therefore attempts an analysis of them, though no solution of immediate application can be suggested. Starting with the illustrative proposition that a polythetic, multiple, unordered classification is required in automatic thesaurus construction, this is considered in the context of classification in general, where eight sorts of classification can be distinguished, each covering a range of class definitions and class-finding algorithms. The problem which follows is that since there is generally no natural or best classification of a set of objects as such, the evaluation of alternative classifications requires either formal criteria of goodness of fit, or, if a classification is required for a purpose, a precises statement of that purpose. In any case a substantive theory of classification is needed, which does not exist; and since sufficiently precise specifications of retrieval requirements are also lacking, the only currently available approach to automatic classification experiments for information retrieval is to do enough of them
- Type
- a
